A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region Q16 Please provide some additional comments on how road users are involved, as background information Q17 Indicate in % terms the proportion of the source of funds for your maintenance and construction program Loans from funding institutions General taxation through budgetary negotiations General taxation related to the use of network or vehicle (e.g., shadow toll) Dedicated road users charges/fees directly related to the use of network or vehicle (e.g., toll) Other (please specify below) Q18 Indicate in % terms the rough proportion of the financial or other contribution from the public or private sector to the following activities: Policy making Administration (budgeting, monitoring, planning) Providing maintenance – upholding the network Providing maintenance – adding asset value to the network Design of new infrastructure Construction of new infrastructure Operations Maintenance (Re)construction No split Financial Public 104 Other input (e.g., staffing) Private Public Private
A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region ExTERNAL REPORTING & USE OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Q19 What kind of monitoring, evaluation, and control measures are used in your organization? (tick boxes, more than one is possible) Internal verification/audit Technical Financial External verification Technical Financial Official inquests - special reviews Technical Financial Q20 Does the RA publish an annual profit & loss account and balance sheet? Does the RA disclose a list of individual assets? Is the RA guided by a strategic plan for organizational development? Is the RA guided by a long-range plan for infrastructure development? On all projects If so, does the plan have performance indicators guiding capital investments? Is the RA guided by quantitative performance targets? Are performance indicators used in the budget or funding process? Are indicators used for public reporting and accountability (e.g., through performance levels)? Are indicators used to manage operational processes? Are indicators used to manage construction project development? Are indicators a part of a performance agreement with an external guiding or financing entity, such as a ministry or legislative body? Are risks analyzed as part of standard processes such as the planning & control process or of standard project management procedures? If so, are actual risk control procedures defined and implemented? Is there a periodical review and simplification of internal rules and regulations? 105 On a sample of projects Yes No On all programs On a sample of programs Comment (who, what, which, how, how often)
Page 1 and 2:
A Review of Highway Agencies in the
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56: A Review of Highway Agencies in the
Page 67 and 68: mandate 6b Expenditure (plan/capita
Page 69 and 70: 20c Over-congested CRN % 21 Network
Page 91 and 92: 7k Expenditure on R&D, technology a
Page 95 and 96: 1. 6 Whether road condition surveys
Page 97 and 98: land management f) Environment impa
Page 99 and 100: 3.1 3 Preparedness for delivery/imp
Page 105: A Review of Highway Agencies in the
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 168:
Transport Division Transport, Water
show all

A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?