A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region

A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region
A2 Guidance Note for Determination of Overall Performance Score
by the Highway Agencies
A2.1 While the highway agency may feel free to decide the weightages to be applied to
each of the indicator categories, it may like to use the following options given in
Table A10.
Table A10: Proposed weightages for categories of indicators
Category Option 1 Option 2
Maximum Marks Maximum Marks (A national/
(A national highway or provincial provincial road corporation)
road or rural road agency/authority)
Mandate, policy and 5-10 5
legal framework
Planning 5-10 10
Capacity 15-20 15
Efficiency 20-25 20
Quality of road network 20-25 20
Private sector participation 5-15 15
Governance 15-20 15
Total 100 100
Note: Under Option 1, while a range is indicated in respect of national highway or provincial road or rural road agency, the weightage adopted for a particular
category should be such that the sum of weightages for all categories put together should be 100.
A2.2 The distribution of maximum marks within each category may again be decided by
the highway agency. An indicative distribution for each indicator within the seven categories
is provided in Table A11. The method proposed for determining the score against
each indicator is also provided subsequently.
86