A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region
A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region
A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
place<br />
3c Annual plans/programs are prepared (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
4 Asset Management<br />
A <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Highway</strong> <strong>Agencies</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>Asia</strong> <strong>Region</strong><br />
4a Road <strong>in</strong>ventory for <strong>the</strong> entire road network is available and (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
updated regularly<br />
Table A11: Indicative distribution <strong>of</strong> marks for each <strong>in</strong>dicator<br />
4b Road <strong>in</strong>formation system / ma<strong>in</strong>tenance management system (Yes / No) 1.0 2.0 2.0<br />
Performance<br />
established and data updated regularly.<br />
National/Prov<strong>in</strong>cial or<br />
National/<br />
Measure/<br />
Rural Road Agency<br />
S. 4c Traffic census are conducted regularly (Yes / No) 1.0 2.0 Prov<strong>in</strong>cial 2.0<br />
Category Objective /<br />
Indicator Unit<br />
No<br />
5 Ratio <strong>of</strong> Allocated budget vs. Required<br />
Lower Upper Road<br />
Outcome/<br />
Range Range Corporation<br />
Output 5a Plan (development/capital works/new construction)<br />
Percent 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
Mandate, A clear<br />
1 5b Non-plan A clear vision/mission (operation and statement ma<strong>in</strong>tenance) exists Percent (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.5<br />
Policy and mandate/scope 1a Sub If Yes, Total please for provide Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> statement below<br />
5.0 10.0 10.0<br />
Legal and sound<br />
Capacity Strength to 6 2 Resource Existence Use <strong>of</strong> Various Acts / Policy<br />
Framework Legal and<br />
deliver <strong>the</strong> 6a Budget (plan/ capital works ) Million ` 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />
Regulatory 2a Road Sector Policy / Strategy <strong>in</strong> Place (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 0.5<br />
mandate<br />
Framework 6b 2b Expenditure <strong>Highway</strong> Act (plan / capital works) Million (Yes / No) ` 1.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.5<br />
Exists<br />
6c 2c Budget PPP/Toll (non-plan Policy / operational and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance )<br />
Million (Yes / No) ` 1.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.5<br />
6d 2d Expenditure SHE Policy (non-plan / operational and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance)<br />
Million (Yes / No) ` 1.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.5<br />
7 2e Human Road Fund Resource, Act Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, R&D<br />
(Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 0.5<br />
7a 2f Human Control resource <strong>of</strong> Land and policy Traffic exists Act and <strong>in</strong> use (Yes / No) 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5<br />
2g 7b Infrastructure Totalnumber <strong>of</strong> Development eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Act staff per 1,000 km <strong>of</strong> total Number (Yes / No) 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5<br />
2h Urban road network Plann<strong>in</strong>g owned Act by <strong>the</strong> agency<br />
(Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 0.5<br />
7c Total number <strong>of</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative staff <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Number<br />
0.5 0.5 0.5<br />
2i Road Safety Policy and Strategy Exist (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 0.5<br />
per 1,000 km <strong>of</strong> total road network owned by <strong>the</strong> agency<br />
Sub total for Mandate, Policy and Legal Framework 5.0 10.0 5.0<br />
7d Total nu mber <strong>of</strong> temporary staff per 1000 km <strong>of</strong> total road Number 0.5 0.5 0.5<br />
3 network Preparation owned <strong>of</strong> Investment by <strong>the</strong> agency Plans<br />
88<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
7e 3a Total A long-term number master <strong>of</strong> specialized plan (10 staff to 15 (planners, years) exists traffic eng<strong>in</strong>eers, Number (Yes / No) 1.0 0.5 2.0 1.0 1.0<br />
3b legal, Three/five environment, year road social, sector f<strong>in</strong>ance, <strong>in</strong>vestment contract plan has specialist, been prepared pavement, (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
bridge/structure designers)<br />
3c Annual plans/programs are prepared (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
7f Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g need assessment done and updated regularly<br />
Yes / No 0.5 0.5 0.5<br />
4 Asset Management<br />
7g Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g plan/strategy exists and updated regularly Yes / No 1.0 2.0 1.0<br />
4a Road <strong>in</strong>ventory for <strong>the</strong> entire road network is available and (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
7h Expenditure updated regularly on tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and skill enhancement<br />
Million ` 1.0 2.0 1.0<br />
4b 7i % Road <strong>of</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation staff system (below / ma<strong>in</strong>tenance SE) sent on management tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g system Percent (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0<br />
7j Percentage established <strong>of</strong> and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g data updated staff regularly. with qualifications equal to Percent 0.5 0.5 0.5<br />
4c M.Tech Traffic census or above are conducted regularly (Yes / No) 1.0 2.0 2.0<br />
5<br />
7k Expenditure<br />
Ratio <strong>of</strong> Allocated<br />
on R&D,<br />
budget<br />
technology<br />
vs. Required<br />
and <strong>in</strong>novation Million ` 0.5 0.5 0.5<br />
8<br />
5a<br />
Delivery<br />
Plan (development/capital<br />
<strong>of</strong> Road Infrastructure<br />
works/new construction)<br />
Percent 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
8a Projects completed (amount)<br />
Million ` 1.0 2.0 1.0<br />
5b Non-plan (operation and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance)<br />
Percent 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
8b Projects <strong>in</strong> progress (amount) Million ` 1.0 2.0 1.0<br />
Sub Total for Plann<strong>in</strong>g 5.0 10.0 10.0<br />
8c Projects ready for bidd<strong>in</strong>g (amount) Million ` 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />
6 Resource Use<br />
Agency has<br />
sound plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
processes <strong>in</strong><br />
place<br />
Capacity Strength to
Change language