A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region
A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region
A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Highway</strong> <strong>Agencies</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>Asia</strong> <strong>Region</strong><br />
Figure C15: Parameters and degree <strong>of</strong> SRA specific goal achievement, 2008<br />
Socioeconomic efficiency<br />
Three parameters<br />
1. Net present value ratio for<br />
road projects larger than SEK<br />
100 million and for projects<br />
opened to traffic <strong>in</strong> 2008<br />
2. Degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternalization for<br />
external marg<strong>in</strong> costs<br />
3. Level <strong>of</strong> repairs<br />
Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> goal was achieved<br />
Overall assessment<br />
Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> goal was achieved<br />
From those, SRA negotiated a comprehensive set <strong>of</strong> 18 objectives supported by more than<br />
300 <strong>in</strong>dividual performance measures it developed for both <strong>in</strong>ternal and external report<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Hard targets for those measures were negotiated between <strong>the</strong> agency and <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>istry.<br />
SRA used a Balanced Scorecard track<strong>in</strong>g process at all levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organization. The results<br />
from each unit feed back <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> organizational scorecard. All major aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agency’s<br />
Balanced Scorecard report<strong>in</strong>g are also tracked on <strong>the</strong> agency <strong>in</strong>tranet, which <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
volum<strong>in</strong>ous reports on agency performance. SRA also had <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tense leadership<br />
tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with small groups <strong>of</strong> managers to ensure <strong>the</strong>y understand <strong>the</strong> performance<br />
management framework <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organization.<br />
Table C3 provides an overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators used by SRA placed with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed<br />
framework <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />
145<br />
Long-term susta<strong>in</strong>ability<br />
Two parameters<br />
1. Parameters for socioeconomic<br />
efficiency~<br />
2. Result for <strong>the</strong> six transport<br />
policy subsidiary goals<br />
-Accessibility<br />
-Transport quality<br />
-Road safety<br />
-Environment<br />
-<strong>Region</strong>al development<br />
-Gender equality<br />
Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> goal was achieved