A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region
A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region
A Review of Highway Agencies in the South Asia Region
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
16 Entity wide ISO or equivalent certification received (Yes / No) 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />
17 Standard Bid Documents Developed (Yes / No) 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />
18 Computerization / Enterprise Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Place (Yes / No) 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />
19 Amount <strong>of</strong> Claims under Dispute Million ` 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />
A <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Highway</strong> <strong>Agencies</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>Asia</strong> <strong>Region</strong><br />
Sub Total for Efficiency 20.0 25.0 20.0<br />
20 Network Congestion Indices<br />
National/Prov<strong>in</strong>cial or<br />
National/<br />
20a Congestion free CRN %<br />
Rural<br />
5.0<br />
Road Agency<br />
S.<br />
6.0 Prov<strong>in</strong>cial 5.0<br />
Indicator Unit<br />
20b No Congested CRN % Lower 1.0 Upper 1.0 Road 1.0<br />
20c Over-congested CRN % Range 0.0 Range 0.0<br />
Corporation<br />
0.0<br />
21 1 Network A clear vision/mission Quality Index statement exists Absolute (Yes / No) 6.0 0.5 7.0 1.0 6.0 0.5<br />
number<br />
1a If Yes, please provide <strong>the</strong> statement below<br />
22a Fatalities per 100 km <strong>of</strong> network Number 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />
2 Existence <strong>of</strong> Various Acts / Policy<br />
22b Accidents per 100 km <strong>of</strong> network Number 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />
2a Road Sector Policy / Strategy <strong>in</strong> Place (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 0.5<br />
23 % <strong>of</strong> Projects where Environment Management Plan was<br />
Percent 2.0 3.0 2.0<br />
2b <strong>Highway</strong> Act (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 0.5<br />
Implemented.<br />
24<br />
2c<br />
%<br />
PPP/Toll<br />
<strong>of</strong> CRN<br />
Policy<br />
managed through Long Term Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance Contracts Percent<br />
(Yes / No)<br />
2.0<br />
0.5<br />
4.0<br />
1.0<br />
2.0<br />
0.5<br />
2d<br />
Sub<br />
SHE<br />
Total<br />
Policy<br />
for Quality <strong>of</strong> Road Network<br />
(Yes / No)<br />
20.0<br />
0.5<br />
25.0<br />
1.0<br />
20.0<br />
0.5<br />
25 2e % Road <strong>of</strong> CRN Fund Developed Act on any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PPP Mode Percent (Yes / No) 2.0 0.5 6.0 1.0 6.0 0.5<br />
26 2f % Control <strong>of</strong> Total <strong>of</strong> Private Land and Sector Traffic Investment Act to <strong>the</strong> Total Investment Percent (Yes / No) 3.0 0.5 9.0 1.0 9.0 0.5<br />
2g Sub Infrastructure Total for Private Development Sector Act Participation (Yes / No) 5.0 0.5 15.0 1.0 15.0 0.5<br />
2h Urban Plann<strong>in</strong>g Act (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 0.5<br />
To Performance<br />
Provide a<br />
Safer, Measure/ Greener,<br />
Reliable Objective and /<br />
Comfortable Outcome/<br />
Road Network<br />
Output<br />
Quality <strong>of</strong><br />
Road Network<br />
Category<br />
A clear<br />
mandate/scope<br />
and sound<br />
Legal and<br />
Regulatory<br />
Framework<br />
Exists<br />
Mandate,<br />
Policy and<br />
Legal<br />
Framework<br />
Promote<br />
Private Sector<br />
Investments<br />
Private Sector<br />
Participation<br />
90<br />
27 2i Department Road Safety Website Policy and Exists Strategy and Updated Exist Regularly (Yes / No) 1.0 0.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.5<br />
28 Adequate Sub total for Representation Mandate, Policy (at least and 25%) Legal <strong>of</strong> Framework Road Users <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> (Yes / No) 1.0 5.0 10.0 2.0 5.0 1.0<br />
Road Fund Board<br />
3 Preparation <strong>of</strong> Investment Plans<br />
29 Users / Stakeholder Forum Established and Convened at<br />
(Yes / No) 1.0 2.0 1.0<br />
3a A long-term master plan (10 to 15 years) exists (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
least Half Yearly<br />
3b Three/five year road sector <strong>in</strong>vestment plan has been prepared (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
30a RTI Compliance Ratio Percent 1.0 2.0 1.0<br />
3c Annual plans/programs are prepared (Yes / No) 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
30b Appeals received by <strong>the</strong> State Information Commission aga<strong>in</strong>st Number 1.0 2.0 1.0<br />
4 <strong>the</strong> Asset Department<br />
Management<br />
31 4a Annual Road <strong>in</strong>ventory Report Published for <strong>the</strong> entire road network is available and (Yes / No) 2.0 0.5 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0<br />
updated regularly<br />
32a Vigilance cases registered Numbers 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />
4b Road <strong>in</strong>formation system / ma<strong>in</strong>tenance management system (Yes / No) 1.0 2.0 2.0<br />
32b Vigilance cases decided as ratio <strong>of</strong> cases registered Percent 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />
established and data updated regularly.<br />
33 Grievance redressal mechanism exists (Yes / No) 2.0 2.0 2.0<br />
4c Traffic census are conducted regularly (Yes / No) 1.0 2.0 2.0<br />
34 Road User Satisfaction Index Absolute<br />
2.0 2.0 2.0<br />
5 Ratio <strong>of</strong> Allocated budget vs. Required<br />
Number<br />
5a<br />
Sub<br />
Plan<br />
Total<br />
(development/capital<br />
for Governance<br />
works/new construction)<br />
Percent<br />
15.0<br />
0.5<br />
20.0<br />
1.0<br />
15.0<br />
1.0<br />
5b Non-plan (operation and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance)<br />
Percent 0.5 1.0 1.0<br />
Governance To operate with<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased user<br />
<strong>in</strong>terface,<br />
Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Agency has<br />
transparency<br />
sound plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and greater<br />
accountability<br />
processes <strong>in</strong><br />
place<br />
Sub Total for Plann<strong>in</strong>g 5.0 10.0 10.0<br />
Note: 1. The currency unit <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators need to be appropriately customized.<br />
2. As an overall total <strong>of</strong> 100 maximum is required for a road agency, <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower and upper ranges would<br />
need to be selected by <strong>the</strong> road agency.<br />
6 Resource Use<br />
Capacity Strength to
Change language