Proceedings - Balai Penelitian Tanah

More documents

Recommendations

Info

99 Sembiring et al. level of tolerance to all the stresses that occur in its growing environment. Thus, in breeding rice for saline environments, multiple stress tolerance traits must be considered. Further more, Zeng and Shannon (2000) reported that rice is rated as an especially saltsensitive crop. The response of rice to salinity varies with growth stage. In the most commonly cultivated rice cultivars, young seedlings were very sensitive to salinity. Yield components related to final grain yield were also severely affected by salinity; panicle length, spikelet number per panicle, and grain yield were significantly reduced. Salinity also delayed the emergence of panicle and flowering and decreased seed set through reduced pollen viability. The 2004 tsunami caused significant degradation to agricultural lands in the coastal region of NAD. The most affected was lowland rice. The rice crop productivity is constrained by a combination of poor seed quality, use of unsuitable varieties, sub-optimal soil fertility and climate variability. To reduce these constraints in tsunami-affected areas of the east and west coast of NAD, the ACIAR tsunami recovery projects in NAD i.e. SMCN 2005/118 and CP2004/05 followed by LWR/2005/118 was aimed at restoring livelihoods through the reestablishment of annual cropping – especially rice cropping, and to reduce the reliance on food aid in tsunami-affected areas of NAD. Several activities have been completed for this project and some results have been implemented with farmers in NAD. Capacity building through workshops and training, research and variety trials – especially on rice cropping - demonstrating of crop management packages have been completed and evaluated. Through this article, the information on salinity affected soil and rice crop, especially in NAD after tsunami, is described and the most feasible remedial measure is suggested. Last, but not least, the implications of salinity research for Indonesian rice growing is also discussed. TSUNAMI IN NANGGROE ACEH DARUSSALAM Tsunami on December 26, 2004 destroyed agricultural land along the western and eastern coast of NAD. The Agriculture Department of Ministry of Agriculture, the Government of Republic of Indonesia has assessed the area affected on food crops by tsunami in east and west coastal districts of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD) (Table 1). At Aceh Besar district 11% of rice crop area was destroyed, especially at Ingin Jaya, Pekan Bada, Lhoknga and Syah Kuala sub-districts. At Pidie district 10.5% of rice crop areas were destroyed, especially at Pidie city and Indra Jaya sub-district. Further more; at Bireuen and Aceh Barat districts 8.1% and 14.7% rice land were devastated by International Workshop on Post Tsunami Soil Management, 1-2 July 2008 in Bogor, Indonesia
100 Sembiring et al. tsunami. The most affected area was the north-west coast of the province, 50-80% food crop areas were badly damaged; around Calang, Lamno, and the north part of Banda Aceh the rice crop areas were severely destroyed (Gani 2005). The most damaged crop land was rice land, due to location of lowland rice at the lower coastal areas. If direct action is not taken to rehabilitate lowland rice area, NAD will not be self sufficient in rice, as it used to be. Table 1. Lowland rice damage by tsunami in some districts, NAD 2005. District Lowland rice area (ha) Total Damage Percentage of damage Aceh Selatan 17916 3627 20.2 Aceh Barat Daya 18249 4520 24.7 Aceh Barat 41538 6107 14.7 Aceh Jaya 15529 4159 26.7 Aceh Besar 30915 3574 11.2 Pidie 38302 4023 10.5 Bireuen 20507 1666 8.1 Total 182956 27676 Total (NAD) 336017 28931 Source: Head of Dinas Pertanian Tanaman Pangan dan Hortikultura Provinsi NAD (personal communication, 2005). Disasters caused by tsunami were structurally, physically, chemically and biologically in nature, in respect to agricultural productivity. Top soil analysis (January 2005) of some tsunami-affected soils showed that soils had become saline-sodic, with EC of 4.27-15.18 dS m -1 and ESP of 13-72% (Gani 2005). More over, Rahman (2007) reported that the tsunami mud collected from 3 districts indicated a very high salinity ranged from 3.7 to 48.9 dS/m and salt content from 9,000 to 26,000 ppm. Improper handling of this tsunami mud may contaminate the sub soil through tillage and infiltration, leading to an elevated increase of salt concentration in the sub soil. Further leaching of sodium may potentially contaminate the ground water which eventually be utilized by the community for their daily consumption. From field visit of ACIAR Team on September 2006, it is showed that salinity had decreased considerably. However, it is not only a need to enhance the leaching of both soluble salts and exchangeable sodium and magnesium to reduce their harmful effects, problems on nutrient imbalance after tsunami may be more important (Sembiring and Gani 2007). International Workshop on Post Tsunami Soil Management, 1-2 July 2008 in Bogor, Indonesia
Page 2 and 3:
Proceedings International Workshop
Page 4 and 5:
iii FOREWORD The active subduction
Page 6 and 7:
Ladies and Gentlemen, v We are situ
Page 8 and 9:
Ladies and Gentlemen, vii The time
Page 10 and 11:
ix sediment, soil and water salinit
Page 12 and 13:
xi TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .....
Page 14 and 15:
1 Harjadi PJP INDONESIA TSUNAMI EAR
Page 16 and 17:
3 Harjadi PJP Figure 3. Site distri
Page 18 and 19:
5 Harjadi PJP The Operational compo
Page 20 and 21:
7 Harjadi PJP National Coordinating
Page 22 and 23:
9 Harjadi PJP • UNESCO, IOC, ITIC
Page 24 and 25:
2.5. Buoys (BPPT) 11 Harjadi PJP Be
Page 26 and 27:
4. Situation Center 13 Harjadi PJP
Page 28 and 29:
Figure 18. The decision support sys
Page 30 and 31:
Figure 20. Observation perspective
Page 32 and 33:
Figure 23. Five in one information
Page 34 and 35:
21 Niino Y AGRICULTURAL IMPACTS IN
Page 36 and 37:
23 Niino Y rehabilitation of salt-a
Page 38 and 39:
25 Niino Y who lost their crops, li
Page 40 and 41:
27 Niino Y damage afflicting agricu
Page 42 and 43:
29 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS N
Page 44 and 45:
31 Niino Y − Income generation th
Page 46 and 47:
33 Abubakar and Basri REHABILITATIO
Page 48 and 49:
35 Abubakar and Basri Table 1. Ligh
Page 50 and 51:
37 Abubakar and Basri Table 3. Thic
Page 52 and 53:
39 Abubakar and Basri Table 5. Padd
Page 54 and 55:
CONCLUSIONS 41 Abubakar and Basri R
Page 56 and 57:
43 MANAGING TSUNAMI-AFFECTED SOILS
Page 58 and 59:
45 Slavich et al. Figure 3. Tsunami
Page 60 and 61:
47 Slavich et al. they were not aff
Page 62 and 63: 49 Slavich et al. factors observed
Page 64 and 65: 51 DYNAMICS OF TSUNAMI-AFFECTED SOI
Page 66 and 67: 53 Rachman et al. measured using th
Page 68 and 69: 55 Rachman et al. Table 2. Characte
Page 70 and 71: 57 Rachman et al. Figure 2. Distrib
Page 72 and 73: 59 Rachman et al. complex are domin
Page 74 and 75: Soil depth (cm) B Soil depth (cm) C
Page 76 and 77: 63 Rachman et al. empty pods. The f
Page 78 and 79: 65 ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS OF FARMING O
Page 80 and 81: 67 Agus F of North America, Europe
Page 82 and 83: International Workshop on Post Tsun
Page 84 and 85: IMPLICATIONS 71 Agus F Land suitabi
Page 86 and 87: 73 Agus F Proceedings of the 12th I
Page 88 and 89: 75 POST-TSUNAMI AGRICULTURE LIVELIH
Page 90 and 91: Nagapattinam Background Geographica
Page 92 and 93: 79 Mohan GMC extensively in compari
Page 94 and 95: 81 Mohan GMC NGOs wherever there wa
Page 96 and 97: 83 Mohan GMC Between February’05
Page 98 and 99: 1.7. Constraints: 85 Mohan GMC •
Page 100 and 101: 87 Mohan GMC The successful first y
Page 102 and 103: 89 Joshi L ACCELERATING LIVELIHOOD
Page 104 and 105: POVERTY AND TREE CROPS 91 Joshi L P
Page 106 and 107: 93 Joshi L The survey conducted in
Page 108 and 109: CONCLUSIONS 95 Joshi L Aceh and Nia
Page 110 and 111: 97 Sembiring et al. IMPLICATIONS OF
Page 114 and 115: 101 Sembiring et al. Leaching, soil
Page 116 and 117: 103 Sembiring et al. Aceh Barat. Th
Page 118 and 119: 105 Sembiring et al. lowland rice t
Page 120 and 121: 107 Sembiring et al. and developmen
Page 122 and 123: 109 Iskandar and Chairunas PALAWIJA
Page 124 and 125: 111 Iskandar and Chairunas Tunong V
Page 126 and 127: 113 Iskandar and Chairunas DPTPH Pr
Page 128 and 129: 115 INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR P
Page 130 and 131: 117 Shea et al. Material support wa
Page 132 and 133: TRANSPORTATION 119 Shea et al. Duri
Page 134 and 135: 121 Shea et al. As highlighted duri
Page 136 and 137: 123 Shea et al. Connection Centers:
Page 138 and 139: 125 Shea et al. Photographs: Left -
Page 140 and 141: 127 Shea et al. Photographs: Left -
Page 142 and 143: MEDIA FOR WOMEN FARMERS 129 Shea et
Page 144 and 145: 131 McLeod et al. SOIL SALINITY ASS
Page 146 and 147: 133 Figure 1. Locations of assessme
Page 148 and 149: 135 McLeod et al. fields after the
Page 150 and 151: 137 Wahyunto et al. ASSESSMENT OF A
Page 152 and 153: 139 Wahyunto et al. 2004 (before th
Page 154 and 155: 141 Wahyunto et al. Since the major
Page 156 and 157: 143 Wahyunto et al. Table 1. Existi
Page 158 and 159: 145 Wahyunto et al. low fertility),
Page 160 and 161: 147 Wahyunto et al. Table 2. Method
Page 162 and 163:
CONCLUSIONS 149 Wahyunto et al. Lan
Page 164 and 165:
151 Wahyunto et al. FAO. 1976. Fram
Page 166 and 167:
153 Sammut et al. TECHNICAL CAPACIT
Page 168 and 169:
155 Sammut et al. associated manage
Page 170 and 171:
157 Sammut et al. Tarunamulia, 2006
Page 172 and 173:
159 Sammut et al. Unfortunately, a
Page 174 and 175:
161 Sammut et al. Gosavi K, Sammut
Page 176 and 177:
163 Chairunas DEVELOPING TECHNOLOGY
Page 178 and 179:
165 Chairunas Table 1. The average
Page 180 and 181:
REFERENCES 167 Chairunas BPS. 2007.
Page 182 and 183:
169 List of Participants Internatio
Page 184 and 185:
171 Didi Ardi S., Dr. Indonesian So
Page 186 and 187:
173 Irawan, Dr. Indonesian Soil Res
Page 188 and 189:
175 Mulyadi, Mr Indonesian Institut
Page 190 and 191:
177 Subhan, Mr Institute for Vegeta
Page 192 and 193:
179 Astu Unadi, Dr. Kepala Balitkli
show all

Proceedings - Balai Penelitian Tanah

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?