Proceedings - Balai Penelitian Tanah

More documents

Recommendations

Info

23 Niino Y rehabilitation of salt-affected lands along with traditional salt tolerant crop/vegetable varieties. Indonesia The impact of the tsunami was felt in ten districts in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD) Province and two districts in North Sumatra (Nias Islands). Significant losses and negative impacts were incurred with respect to human resources, loss of land, livestock, office buildings, laboratories, housing complexes, and infrastructure. The estimated loss of productivity in the agriculture sector amounts to US$270 million with the quake and tsunami resulting in salinization and sedimentation of crop and plantation lands (FAO, 2006a). The estimated budget required for recovery amounted to US$397.6 million with focus on the rehabilitation of land in order to facilitate the recovery of economic activities for rural communities, rehabilitation of the capacity of agricultural support services (physical and human resources), and people empowerment and institutional development through technical and organizational support. The immediate activities included the rehabilitation of drainage, irrigation, and land (12,961 ha); the rehabilitation of 15,000 m 3 of farmroads; food and horticulture crops production resumed in 25,800 ha; compensation for losses of livestock totalling 7,745 animals; replanting the estate crops to cover 5,331 ha; replanting the palm oil on 4,950 ha; the procurement of agricultural machinery and tools (1,256 units); food security packages (4,000) to be distributed; and development of the capacity of agriculture organizations, farmer groups, and agricultural personnel (FAO, 2006a). The long-term rehabilitation programme focused on the rehabilitation of heavily affected paddy fields with an emphasis on the rebuilding of new paddy fields; the establishment of new farms to produce coconut and palm oil; the development of workshops for the servicing of agricultural machinery; the rebuilding of market facilities for livestock; the redevelopment of farmers organizations and extension workers; the redevelopment of agricultural education and training; the development of new suitable technologies appropriate for agroindustries; the development of market oriented activities through the establishment of agribusiness terminals; and establishing of business partners. The FAO assistance aimed at rapidly kick-starting basic agricultural activities through the supply of urgent agricultural inputs and the rehabilitation of basic farm infrastructure, thereby reducing dependency on food aid. In total, 23,000 farmers benefited from the distribution of seed. More than 15,500 farmers received vegetables and secondary crop seeds. In addition, estate crops were distributed to more than 5,000 beneficiaries. International Workshop on Post Tsunami Soil Management, 1-2 July 2008 in Bogor, Indonesia
Maldives 24 Niino Y Thirty-nine islands were damaged and nearly a third of the population, or 100 000 people, were affected. Fourteen islands were completely destroyed and had to be evacuated. Approximately 12,000 people were displaced from their islands, and another 8,500 temporarily relocated within their home island. It was estimated that the tsunami damaged field crops in 2,100 farms; destroyed home gardens and agricultural tools in 11,700 homesteads; and damaged more than 700,000 fruit trees and 840,000 timber trees in inhabited islands. The damage to land and groundwater resources was severe in 35 agricultural islands, and saline water intrusion affected 112 inhabited islands (FAO, 2006a). The geographical dispersion of the islands severely constrained the collection, collation and analysis of reliable data in a timely manner to inform the required immediate intervention responses of the Government and its supportive international development partners. The situation was further compounded by the lack of baseline data on the agricultural sector prior to the tsunami. In an effort to rehabilitate the agricultural sector, assistance focused on the replacement of basic production inputs to tsunami affected farmers and home gardeners; the strengthening of agricultural extension to facilitate the re-establishment of agriculture and horticulture; and the strengthening of agricultural institutional capacity. The main post-tsunami relief/recovery activities included the provision of a package of technical assistance through short-term consultants/experts, capacity building for farmers and MFAMR staff effected through training workshops and the distribution of replacement packages of agricultural assets (start-up agricultural kits comprising a range of selected inputs: seeds, seedlings, cuttings, fertilizer, compost and assorted implements). Myanmar The tsunami had a limited impact and was confined to areas of the Myanmar coastal zone. The Pyinsalu sub-township of Labutta Township was the worst affected area with 25 people losing their lives, more than 1,000 people left homeless and 289 houses totally destroyed. Four villages, namely Khar Pyat Thaung, Lay Yin Kwin, Kaingthaung and Aung Hlaing in the Pyinsalu sub-township were severely affected (FAO, 2005). The main goal of the assistance was to provide necessary assistance so as to resume the livelihoods of tsunami affected fishers and farmers with a focus on both the immediate and long-term. Farmers International Workshop on Post Tsunami Soil Management, 1-2 July 2008 in Bogor, Indonesia
Page 2 and 3: Proceedings International Workshop
Page 4 and 5: iii FOREWORD The active subduction
Page 6 and 7: Ladies and Gentlemen, v We are situ
Page 8 and 9: Ladies and Gentlemen, vii The time
Page 10 and 11: ix sediment, soil and water salinit
Page 12 and 13: xi TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .....
Page 14 and 15: 1 Harjadi PJP INDONESIA TSUNAMI EAR
Page 16 and 17: 3 Harjadi PJP Figure 3. Site distri
Page 18 and 19: 5 Harjadi PJP The Operational compo
Page 20 and 21: 7 Harjadi PJP National Coordinating
Page 22 and 23: 9 Harjadi PJP • UNESCO, IOC, ITIC
Page 24 and 25: 2.5. Buoys (BPPT) 11 Harjadi PJP Be
Page 26 and 27: 4. Situation Center 13 Harjadi PJP
Page 28 and 29: Figure 18. The decision support sys
Page 30 and 31: Figure 20. Observation perspective
Page 32 and 33: Figure 23. Five in one information
Page 34 and 35: 21 Niino Y AGRICULTURAL IMPACTS IN
Page 38 and 39: 25 Niino Y who lost their crops, li
Page 40 and 41: 27 Niino Y damage afflicting agricu
Page 42 and 43: 29 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS N
Page 44 and 45: 31 Niino Y − Income generation th
Page 46 and 47: 33 Abubakar and Basri REHABILITATIO
Page 48 and 49: 35 Abubakar and Basri Table 1. Ligh
Page 50 and 51: 37 Abubakar and Basri Table 3. Thic
Page 52 and 53: 39 Abubakar and Basri Table 5. Padd
Page 54 and 55: CONCLUSIONS 41 Abubakar and Basri R
Page 56 and 57: 43 MANAGING TSUNAMI-AFFECTED SOILS
Page 58 and 59: 45 Slavich et al. Figure 3. Tsunami
Page 60 and 61: 47 Slavich et al. they were not aff
Page 62 and 63: 49 Slavich et al. factors observed
Page 64 and 65: 51 DYNAMICS OF TSUNAMI-AFFECTED SOI
Page 66 and 67: 53 Rachman et al. measured using th
Page 68 and 69: 55 Rachman et al. Table 2. Characte
Page 70 and 71: 57 Rachman et al. Figure 2. Distrib
Page 72 and 73: 59 Rachman et al. complex are domin
Page 74 and 75: Soil depth (cm) B Soil depth (cm) C
Page 76 and 77: 63 Rachman et al. empty pods. The f
Page 78 and 79: 65 ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS OF FARMING O
Page 80 and 81: 67 Agus F of North America, Europe
Page 82 and 83: International Workshop on Post Tsun
Page 84 and 85: IMPLICATIONS 71 Agus F Land suitabi
Page 86 and 87:
73 Agus F Proceedings of the 12th I
Page 88 and 89:
75 POST-TSUNAMI AGRICULTURE LIVELIH
Page 90 and 91:
Nagapattinam Background Geographica
Page 92 and 93:
79 Mohan GMC extensively in compari
Page 94 and 95:
81 Mohan GMC NGOs wherever there wa
Page 96 and 97:
83 Mohan GMC Between February’05
Page 98 and 99:
1.7. Constraints: 85 Mohan GMC •
Page 100 and 101:
87 Mohan GMC The successful first y
Page 102 and 103:
89 Joshi L ACCELERATING LIVELIHOOD
Page 104 and 105:
POVERTY AND TREE CROPS 91 Joshi L P
Page 106 and 107:
93 Joshi L The survey conducted in
Page 108 and 109:
CONCLUSIONS 95 Joshi L Aceh and Nia
Page 110 and 111:
97 Sembiring et al. IMPLICATIONS OF
Page 112 and 113:
99 Sembiring et al. level of tolera
Page 114 and 115:
101 Sembiring et al. Leaching, soil
Page 116 and 117:
103 Sembiring et al. Aceh Barat. Th
Page 118 and 119:
105 Sembiring et al. lowland rice t
Page 120 and 121:
107 Sembiring et al. and developmen
Page 122 and 123:
109 Iskandar and Chairunas PALAWIJA
Page 124 and 125:
111 Iskandar and Chairunas Tunong V
Page 126 and 127:
113 Iskandar and Chairunas DPTPH Pr
Page 128 and 129:
115 INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR P
Page 130 and 131:
117 Shea et al. Material support wa
Page 132 and 133:
TRANSPORTATION 119 Shea et al. Duri
Page 134 and 135:
121 Shea et al. As highlighted duri
Page 136 and 137:
123 Shea et al. Connection Centers:
Page 138 and 139:
125 Shea et al. Photographs: Left -
Page 140 and 141:
127 Shea et al. Photographs: Left -
Page 142 and 143:
MEDIA FOR WOMEN FARMERS 129 Shea et
Page 144 and 145:
131 McLeod et al. SOIL SALINITY ASS
Page 146 and 147:
133 Figure 1. Locations of assessme
Page 148 and 149:
135 McLeod et al. fields after the
Page 150 and 151:
137 Wahyunto et al. ASSESSMENT OF A
Page 152 and 153:
139 Wahyunto et al. 2004 (before th
Page 154 and 155:
141 Wahyunto et al. Since the major
Page 156 and 157:
143 Wahyunto et al. Table 1. Existi
Page 158 and 159:
145 Wahyunto et al. low fertility),
Page 160 and 161:
147 Wahyunto et al. Table 2. Method
Page 162 and 163:
CONCLUSIONS 149 Wahyunto et al. Lan
Page 164 and 165:
151 Wahyunto et al. FAO. 1976. Fram
Page 166 and 167:
153 Sammut et al. TECHNICAL CAPACIT
Page 168 and 169:
155 Sammut et al. associated manage
Page 170 and 171:
157 Sammut et al. Tarunamulia, 2006
Page 172 and 173:
159 Sammut et al. Unfortunately, a
Page 174 and 175:
161 Sammut et al. Gosavi K, Sammut
Page 176 and 177:
163 Chairunas DEVELOPING TECHNOLOGY
Page 178 and 179:
165 Chairunas Table 1. The average
Page 180 and 181:
REFERENCES 167 Chairunas BPS. 2007.
Page 182 and 183:
169 List of Participants Internatio
Page 184 and 185:
171 Didi Ardi S., Dr. Indonesian So
Page 186 and 187:
173 Irawan, Dr. Indonesian Soil Res
Page 188 and 189:
175 Mulyadi, Mr Indonesian Institut
Page 190 and 191:
177 Subhan, Mr Institute for Vegeta
Page 192 and 193:
179 Astu Unadi, Dr. Kepala Balitkli
show all

Proceedings - Balai Penelitian Tanah

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?