10.08.2013 Views

Untitled - Sciencemadness Dot Org

Untitled - Sciencemadness Dot Org

Untitled - Sciencemadness Dot Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SHOCK INITIATION PROPERTIES<br />

Fig. 4.01. Experimental arrange-<br />

ment for most wedge test shots.<br />

4.1 Wedrge-Test Data. Majowicz and Jacobs,’ and Campbell, Davis, Ramsay,<br />

and Travis? first used the wedge test to study shock initiation of solid explosives.<br />

The test is named for the wedge-shaped explosive sample that is shocked by a<br />

booster-anId-attenuator system as shown in Fig. 4.01. The explosive is wedge-shaped<br />

so that the shock or detonation wave moving through it is visible along the slant<br />

face. The slant face and flat of the sample are covered with a thin aluminized plastic<br />

and are ill-uminated by an intense light source. A smear camera is aligned so as to<br />

record the light reflecting from the aluminized plastic. As the shock wave proceeds<br />

through the explosive, the motion of the explosive mass tilts the reflecting surface<br />

on the slant face so that the light is no longer reflected into the camera. This sharp<br />

cutoff of light gives a well-defined record of the shock or detonation location vs time.<br />

Usually, the shock wave appears to travel through the explosive sample at a slightly<br />

increasing velocity and then to travel at a significantly higher velocity when detona-<br />

tion occurs. The point of interest is the distance into the sample, x*, or time, t*, at<br />

which detonation occurs.<br />

The booster-and-attenuator system is selected to provide about the desired shock<br />

pressure in the sample wedge. In all but a few of the experiments on which data are<br />

presented here, the booster-and-attenuator systems consisted of a plane-wave lens,<br />

a booster explosive, and an inert metal or plastic shock attenuator. In some in-<br />

stances, the attenuator is composed of several materials. The pressure and particle<br />

velocity are assumed to be the same on both sides of the attenuator-and-sample in-<br />

terface. However, because initiation is not a steady state, this boundary condition is<br />

not precisely correct. The free-surface velocity of the attenuator is measured, and<br />

the partic1.e velocity is assumed to be about half that. The shock Hugoniot of the at-<br />

tenuator is assumed to be known, so the shock pressure and particle velocity in the<br />

attenuator can be evaluated using the free-surface velocity measurement. Then, the<br />

pressure (P) and particle velocity (U,) in the explosive sample are found by deter-<br />

mining graphically the intersection of the attenuator rarefaction locus and the<br />

293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!