16.08.2013 Views

The role of contractual arrangements in improving health sector ...

The role of contractual arrangements in improving health sector ...

The role of contractual arrangements in improving health sector ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lebanon<br />

Overall, the contracts allow the concerned national programmes to receive WHO expertise<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> cooperation. In addition to the actual activities <strong>of</strong> programmes, several examples<br />

illustrate that the outcomes <strong>of</strong> cooperation with WHO may go beyond the programmes<br />

themselves. This is shown, for example, <strong>in</strong> the contribution <strong>of</strong> WHO to immunization campaign<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g the detection <strong>of</strong> the polio case <strong>in</strong> Akkar <strong>in</strong> 2003 and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Health personnel and pharmacists <strong>in</strong> different aspects related to rational dispens<strong>in</strong>g. While the<br />

contract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>arrangements</strong> with WHO have given important benefits, it is difficult to ascribe all<br />

<strong>of</strong> these fruits to the use <strong>of</strong> the contract as a tool. Rather, many <strong>of</strong> the activities are based on the<br />

voluntary participation <strong>of</strong> WHO as a concerned agency <strong>in</strong> Lebanon.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are certa<strong>in</strong> limitations to the collaborative <strong>arrangements</strong> between the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />

Public Health and WHO. <strong>The</strong> different national programmes commonly contract with other<br />

parties, e.g. consultants or other agencies, to carry out specific tasks on WHO consultancy pay<br />

scales. Additional overhead is paid to these third parties, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the overall overhead <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programmes. Furthermore, it is not clear that the different programmes have had the desired<br />

effects. This is seen with regard to the <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>ked programmes <strong>of</strong> tobacco control as well as<br />

noncommunicable disease control, which have not been closely coord<strong>in</strong>ated and have not been<br />

able to effect the desired policy change. <strong>The</strong> AIDS control programme is the only collaborative<br />

programme that has a written and declared national strategy. None <strong>of</strong> the other programmes<br />

have clear strategy with <strong>in</strong>dicators, annual reports, performance assessment. Similarly, none <strong>of</strong><br />

the programmes have sub-strategies for the different components <strong>of</strong> the programme. For<br />

example, a primary <strong>health</strong> care strategy cannot be implemented without a sub-strategy on<br />

reproductive <strong>health</strong>, which does not currently exist.<br />

Other publicly-f<strong>in</strong>anced agencies<br />

Several public organizations (Table 1) cover a range <strong>of</strong> social services, e.g. <strong>health</strong> and<br />

education, which may or may not be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed beyond the age <strong>of</strong> retirement. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

organizations have <strong>health</strong> funds which use contracts to secure <strong>health</strong> care services for their<br />

beneficiaries. Covered <strong>health</strong> services typically <strong>in</strong>clude hospitalization, ambulatory care<br />

(physician- and non-physician provided), drugs, and various <strong>health</strong> enabl<strong>in</strong>g aids. <strong>The</strong> exact<br />

types <strong>of</strong> services, class <strong>of</strong> services, and amount <strong>of</strong> co-payment by beneficiaries do vary among<br />

the different funds. However, all funds have similar mechanisms for contract<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

hospitalization and ambulatory care; these will be discussed under “case studies”.<br />

It may be worthwhile here to make a brief <strong>in</strong>troduction to the largest two <strong>of</strong> these<br />

organizations, the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) and the Civil Servant Cooperative<br />

(CSC). <strong>The</strong> NSSF was set up <strong>in</strong> 1961 and covers employees <strong>of</strong> the formal <strong>sector</strong>, <strong>contractual</strong> and<br />

wage earners <strong>of</strong> the public <strong>sector</strong>, employees <strong>of</strong> autonomous public <strong>in</strong>stitutions and others (e.g.<br />

physicians, public school teachers) and family dependents. <strong>The</strong> number currently enrolled at<br />

NSSF is around 430 000 Lebanese, and the total number <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g dependent<br />

family members) is estimated to be around 1.3 million, or around a third <strong>of</strong> the Lebanese<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!