5. Public Reporting as a Quality Improvement Strategy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1334. Turner PD, Pol LG. Beyond Patient Satisfaction. Journal of Health Care Marketing. 1995 Fall95;15(3):45-53. Exclusion reason: No outcome data 1335. Tynan A, Liebhaber A, Ginsburg PB. A health plan work in progress: hospital-physician price and quality transparency. Res Briefs. 2008 Aug(7):1-8. PMID: 18831095. Exclusion reason: No outcome data 1336. Ulecia Martínez MÁ, Gómez Doblas JJ. Quality of Care in Cardiology. From Theory to Practice. Revista Española de Cardiología. 2007;7(Supl.C):47-54. Exclusion reason: Wrong topic 1337. United States. General Accounting O. Health care reform “report cards” are useful but significant issues need to be addressed : report to the chairman, Committee on Labor and Human Resources, U.S. Senate. Washington, D.C. (441 G St., NW, Rm. LM, Washington, 20548): U.S. General Accounting Office; 1994. Exclusion reason: Background 1338. United States. General Accounting O. California Nursing Homes: care problems persist despite federal and state oversight; 1998. Exclusion reason: Wrong topic 1339. United States. General Accounting O. Nursing homes : public reporting of quality indicators has merit, but national implementation is premature : report to congressional requesters. [Washington, D.C.]: United States General Accounting Office; 2002. Exclusion reason: Background 1340. United States. Government Accountability O. Health care 20 years from now: taking steps today to meet tomorrow’s challenges. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Accountability Office; 2007. Exclusion reason: Background 1341. United States. Government Accountability O. Nursing homes CMS’s special focus facility methodology should better target the most poorly performing homes, which tended to be chain affiliated and for-profit : report to congressional requesters. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office; 2009. Exclusion reason: Wrong topic 1342. Unroe KT, Greiner MA, Colon-Emeric C, et al. Associations between published quality ratings of skilled nursing facilities and outcomes of medicare beneficiaries with heart failure. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Feb;13(2):188 e1-6. PMID: 21621479. Exclusion reason: Methods 1343. Urbanek J. Informed and Empowered. Advisor Today. 2011;106(4):26-. Exclusion reason: No outcome data 1344. Vaiana ME, McGlynn EA. What cognitive science tells us about the design of reports for consumers. Med Care Res Rev. 2002 Mar;59(1):3-35. PMID: 11877877. Exclusion reason: Background 1345. Vallet G, Perrin A, Keller C, et al. [Public access to information about the services and quality of care in public hospitals: the need for methodologic clarity. A survey of 44 university hospital directors and administrators]. Presse Med. 2006 Mar;35(3 Pt 1):388- 92. PMID: 16550127. Exclusion reason: Not English C-110
1346. Van Beek K, Duchemin S, Gersh G, et al. Counseling and wellness services integrated with primary care: a delivery system that works. Perm J. 2008 Fall;12(4):20-4. PMID: 21339917. Exclusion reason: PR as outcome 1347. van den Berg B, Van Dommelen P, Stam P, et al. Preferences and choices for care and health insurance. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jun;66(12):2448-59. PMID: 18400349. Exclusion reason: Background 1348. van der Weijden T, van Veenendaal H, Timmermans D. Shared decision-making in the Netherlands--current state and future perspectives. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(4):241-6. PMID: 17601179. Exclusion reason: No outcome data 1349. Van Spall H. Report cards for cardiac care. JAMA. 2010 Apr 14;303(14):1367; author reply -8. PMID: 20388887. Exclusion reason: No outcome data 1350. Varner T, Christy J. Consumer information needs in a competitive health care environment. Health Care Financ Rev. 1986(Spec No):99-104. PMID: 10311937. Exclusion reason: No outcome data 1351. Virnig BA, Scholle SH, Chou AF, et al. Efforts to reduce racial disparities in Medicare managed care must consider the disproportionate effects of geography. Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jan;13(1):51-6. PMID: 17227203. Exclusion reason: PR as outcome 1352. Voelker R. HCFA focuses on new plans for quality care. Health Care Financing Administration. JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1559. PMID: 9370482. Exclusion reason: No outcome data 1353. Vonberg RP, Sander C, Gastmeier P. Consumer attitudes about health care acquired infections: a German survey on factors considered important in the choice of a hospital. Am J Med Qual. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):56-9. PMID: 18187591. Exclusion reason: Wrong topic 1354. Vrangbaek K, Ostergren K, Birk HO, et al. Patient reactions to hospital choice in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden. Health Econ Policy Law. 2007 Apr;2(Pt 2):125-52. PMID: 18634659. Exclusion reason: Wrong topic 1355. Wade J. NCQA checks up on HMOs. National Committee for Quality Assurance. RT: The Journal for Respiratory Care Practitioners. 1996;9(1):41-3. Exclusion reason: No outcome data 1356. Waggoner DM. Interpreting HCFA mortality data for the public. Healthc Financ Manage. 1992 Aug;46(8):20-1, 3. PMID: 10145661. Exclusion reason: No outcome data 1357. Wagner JT, Meier C, Higdon T. A perspective from clinical and business ethics on adverse events in hospitalized patients. J Fla Med Assoc. 1997 Nov;84(8):502-5. PMID: 9401346. Exclusion reason: Wrong topic 1358. Wainstein BK, Sterling-Levis K, Baker SA, et al. Use of the Internet by parents of paediatric patients. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006 Sep;42(9):528-32. PMID: 16925539. Exclusion reason: Wrong topic 1359. Walker T. PPOs face more quality measures. Managed Healthcare Executive. 2007;17(9):9-. Exclusion reason: No outcome data C-111
Page 1 and 2:
Evidence Report/Technology Assessme
Page 3 and 4:
This report is based on research co
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgments We would like to ac
Page 7 and 8:
Public Reporting as a Quality Impro
Page 9 and 10:
Tables Table A. Summary Evidence Ta
Page 11 and 12:
and using reports and other decisio
Page 13 and 14:
• Outcomes (specified for each Ke
Page 15 and 16:
Methods A Technical Expert Panel fo
Page 17 and 18:
setting), and the strength of the b
Page 19 and 20:
Table A. Summary evidence table: ef
Page 21 and 22:
was at the time the included studie
Page 23 and 24:
6. Hibbard JH, Sofaer S. Best Pract
Page 25 and 26:
access to essential information and
Page 27 and 28:
providers, for purposes of this rev
Page 29 and 30:
information and reduces comprehensi
Page 31 and 32:
Methods Topic Nomination and Develo
Page 33 and 34:
Table 1. Public reporting concepts
Page 35 and 36:
• The public reporting was only a
Page 37 and 38:
• Key Question 2. Harms included
Page 39 and 40:
were retained, but they were not as
Page 41 and 42:
Data Extraction Following full text
Page 43 and 44:
Data Synthesis We separated studies
Page 45 and 46:
Results Organization The results of
Page 47 and 48:
Overview of Effectiveness of Public
Page 49 and 50:
Access restrictions. It was unclear
Page 51 and 52:
o The results of two studies sugges
Page 53 and 54:
Key Question 5 What characteristics
Page 55 and 56:
Long-term care • Studies that exa
Page 57 and 58:
Harms (Key Question 2) • Two 52,6
Page 59 and 60:
eport known as QualityCounts was pr
Page 61 and 62:
Table 1. Study findings: hospital c
Page 63 and 64:
o One study found that patients tre
Page 65 and 66:
condition found declines for CHF (7
Page 67 and 68:
developed (HCAHPS) and public repor
Page 69 and 70:
Key Question 6. Context Two studies
Page 71 and 72:
• Survey responses of hospitals i
Page 73 and 74:
activity would influence hospital c
Page 75 and 76:
Lab-Type Experiments The two articl
Page 77 and 78:
Table 3. Summary of evidence: publi
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Individual Clinicians and Outpatien
Page 93 and 94:
public reports influenced the contr
Page 95 and 96:
New York State to trends in other S
Page 97 and 98:
One study evaluated use of a Web si
Page 99 and 100:
Patients. Patient reactions to publ
Page 101 and 102:
Table 4. Summary of evidence: quali
Page 103 and 104:
Table 4. Summary of evidence: Quali
Page 105 and 106:
Health Plans Rating and reporting o
Page 107 and 108:
The public reporting intervention i
Page 109 and 110:
that included adjustment for severa
Page 111 and 112:
Key Question 6. Context Five studie
Page 113 and 114:
about patient-physician relationshi
Page 115 and 116:
CAHPS results. Credibility of the r
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Long-Term Care Services Prior syste
Page 125 and 126:
o Improvement in one QM (influenza
Page 127 and 128:
studies that examined change and tr
Page 129 and 130:
Table 6. Study findings: change in
Page 131 and 132:
ehospitalizations for these patient
Page 133 and 134:
improvements in the pain measure we
Page 135 and 136:
Werner et al. 107 2012 included ext
Page 137 and 138:
Table 7. Summary of evidence: long-
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 3. Number of included quanti
Page 149 and 150:
suggests the possibility that addit
Page 151 and 152:
Table 8. Summary evidence table: Ef
Page 153 and 154:
literature sources that we were abl
Page 155 and 156:
of public reports have a wide range
Page 157 and 158:
approaches to reducing bias in heal
Page 159 and 160:
21. Young G. Multistakeholder regio
Page 161 and 162:
60. Castle NG, Liu D, Engberg J. Th
Page 163 and 164:
99. Knutson DJ, Kind EA, Fowles JB,
Page 165 and 166:
141. Schneider EC, Epstein AM. Infl
Page 167 and 168:
181. Scanlo DP, Chernew M, McLaughl
Page 169 and 170:
222. Ketelaar NA, Faber MJ, Flottor
Page 171 and 172:
Appendix A. Literature Search Datab
Page 173 and 174:
CINAHL EBSCO Plus with Full Text Da
Page 175 and 176:
EMBASE - Elsevier (1973-present) Da
Page 177 and 178:
Public Affairs Information Service
Page 179 and 180:
Full Text Review Include: Based on
Page 181 and 182:
Appendix C. Included and Excluded S
Page 183 and 184:
29. Castle NG, Sonon K, Antonova J.
Page 185 and 186:
58. Gabel JR. When employers choose
Page 187 and 188:
86. Hibbard JH, Peters E, Dixon A,
Page 189 and 190:
117. Marshall M, Noble J, Davies H,
Page 191 and 192:
145. Pettijohn TL, Lawrence ME. The
Page 193 and 194:
174. Spranca MD, Elliott MN, Shaw R
Page 195 and 196:
6. NCQA releases HEDIS 2.0 standard
Page 197 and 198:
40. Pacific Business Group on Healt
Page 199 and 200:
74. The effect of report cards on M
Page 201 and 202:
110. MGMA addresses accuracy concer
Page 203 and 204:
137. Applebaum R, Kunkel S, Wilson
Page 205 and 206:
165. Barkauskas VH, Pohl JM, Benker
Page 207 and 208:
193. Bindman AB, Wholey DR, Christi
Page 209 and 210:
219. Bratzler DW. Development of na
Page 211 and 212:
247. Caldwell B. Employers use perf
Page 213 and 214:
275. Centre for R, Dissemination. P
Page 215 and 216:
301. Chesanow N. Managed care 1999.
Page 217 and 218:
329. Commonwealth Fund. Commission
Page 219 and 220:
358. Daly JM, Jogerst GJ. Associati
Page 221 and 222:
386. DeLiberty RN. Developing a pub
Page 223 and 224:
412. Doty MM, Koren MJ, Sturla EL,
Page 225 and 226:
439. Elliott MN, Beckett MK, Kanous
Page 227 and 228:
467. Feeley TW, Fly HS, Albright H,
Page 229 and 230:
494. French J. 2003 E.I. Hood Award
Page 231 and 232:
522. Ginsburg PB, Kemper, N. M. Hea
Page 233 and 234:
551. Graham JD. Is reporting of qua
Page 235 and 236:
581. Gruber T, Rudnitsky B. Can we
Page 237 and 238:
608. Hardingham L. Informed decisio
Page 239 and 240: 633. Heidenreich PA, Lewis WR, LaBr
Page 241 and 242: 660. Hodgson ES, Simpson L, Lannon
Page 243 and 244: 689. Izakovic M. New trends in the
Page 245 and 246: 718. Kakkar A, Jacobson BC. Interne
Page 247 and 248: 747. Ketelaar N, Faber M, Flottorp
Page 249 and 250: 772. . Importance of stratification
Page 251 and 252: 800. Leonardi MJ, McGory ML, Ko CY.
Page 253 and 254: 827. Livingston EH. Bariatric surge
Page 255 and 256: 856. Mantone J. Massachusetts site
Page 257 and 258: 882. Mazza G, Fazzi B. Five good re
Page 259 and 260: 907. McKibben L, Horan T, Tokars JI
Page 261 and 262: 935. Miller R, Lazar J. Public repo
Page 263 and 264: 963. Morrison K. The road to JCAHO
Page 265 and 266: 989. National Committee for Quality
Page 267 and 268: 1017. O’Malley C. Quality measure
Page 269 and 270: 1045. Peabody J. Why we love qualit
Page 271 and 272: 1073. Qaseem A, Snow V, Gosfield A,
Page 273 and 274: 1100. Robinowitz DL, Dudley RA. Pub
Page 275 and 276: 1129. Roski J, Kim MG. Current effo
Page 277 and 278: 1156. Sangl JA, Wolf LF. Role of co
Page 279 and 280: 1183. Schull MJ, Guttmann A, Leaver
Page 281 and 282: 1212. Shea JA, Guerra CE, Weiner J,
Page 283 and 284: 1238. Simpson AG, DeGuzman PB, Barb
Page 285 and 286: 1264. Sofaer S. What information do
Page 287 and 288: 1292. Stewart DW, Hickson GB, Pechm
Page 289: 1320. Tjia J, Field TS, Fischer SH,
Page 293 and 294: 1374. Weingarten JP, Jr., Fan W, Pe
Page 295 and 296: 1401. Wiljer D, Bogomilsky S, Catto
Page 297 and 298: 1426. Zaslavsky AM, Shaul JA, Zabor
Page 299 and 300: Appendix E. Description of Public R
Page 301 and 302: Table E1. Descriptive information a
Page 303 and 304: Table E1. Descriptive information a
Page 305 and 306: Appendix F. Method for Quality Asse
Page 307 and 308: the time periods actually prior to
Page 309 and 310: Application to Public Reporting Thi
Page 311 and 312: Table G1. Quality assessment criter
Page 313 and 314: Table G1. Quality assessment criter
Page 315 and 316: Section A Appendix H. Hospitals: Qu
Page 317 and 318: Table H1. Hospital quantitative stu
Page 341 and 342:
Table H1. Hospital quantitative stu
Page 343 and 344:
Section B Table H2. C Hospital quan
Page 345 and 346:
Author, Year (QA) Baker 2003 4 (Fai
Page 347 and 348:
Author, Year (QA) Clough 2002 10 (F
Page 349 and 350:
Author, Year (QA) Dranove 2003 13 (
Page 351 and 352:
Author, Year (QA) Foreman 1995 16 (
Page 353 and 354:
Author, Year (QA) Guru 2006 19 (Fai
Page 355 and 356:
Author, Year (QA) Hibbard 2003 24 (
Page 357 and 358:
Author, Year (QA) Jang 2011 28 (Fai
Page 359 and 360:
Author, Year (QA) Mennemeyer 1997 3
Page 361 and 362:
Author, Year (QA) Omoigui 1996 34 (
Page 363 and 364:
Author, Year (QA) Pope 2009 36 (Fai
Page 365 and 366:
Author, Year (QA) 9. Context: Decis
Page 367 and 368:
Author, Year (QA) Vladeck 1988 42 (
Page 369 and 370:
Author, Year (QA) Wuebker, 2008 45
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Table I1. Hospital qualitative stud
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Section B Table I2. Hospital qualit
Page 429 and 430:
Author, Year 10. KQ3:Results 11. KQ
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Author, Year 10. KQ3:Results design
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Author, 15. Funder of Research/ Yea
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Regarding the least useful aspects,
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Section A Appendix J. Individual Pr
Page 481 and 482:
Author Year (QA) Hannan 1994 21 (Go
Page 483 and 484:
Author Year (QA) Mukamel 1998 33 (F
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Author Year (QA) Werner 53 2005 (Go
Page 489 and 490:
Author Year (QA) Glance 2008 48 (Fa
Page 491 and 492:
Author Year (QA) Hannan 1994 21 (Go
Page 493 and 494:
Author Year (QA) Results: KQ1: (Hea
Page 495 and 496:
Page 497 and 498:
Page 499 and 500:
Author Year (QA) Ranganathan 2009 5
Page 501 and 502:
Page 503 and 504:
Author Year (QA) Werner 2005 53 (Go
Page 505 and 506:
Page 507 and 508:
Author Year Barr 2008 144 1. Study
Page 509 and 510:
Author Year Casalino 2007 146 1. St
Page 511 and 512:
Author Year Fanjiang 2007 150 1. St
Page 513 and 514:
Author Year Friedber g 2010 151 1.
Page 515 and 516:
Author Year 1. Study Purpose and/or
Page 517 and 518:
Author Year Longo 2003 119 1. Study
Page 519 and 520:
Author Year Marshall 2006 154 Mayth
Page 521 and 522:
Author Year 1. Study Purpose and/or
Page 523 and 524:
Author Year Schneid er 1996 138 Con
Page 525 and 526:
Author Year Schultz 2001 158 Stein
Page 527 and 528:
Author Year QA Beaulieu 2002 56 Fai
Page 529 and 530:
Author Year QA Chernew 2004 58 Fair
Page 531 and 532:
Author Year QA Farley 2002 62 Good
Page 533 and 534:
Author Year QA Hendricks 2009 66 Po
Page 535 and 536:
Author Year QA 1. Study Purpose and
Page 537 and 538:
Page 539 and 540:
Page 541 and 542:
Author Year QA Beaulieu 2002 56 Fai
Page 543 and 544:
Author Year QA Chernew 2004 58 Fair
Page 545 and 546:
Author Year QA 11. Results: KQ1: (H
Page 547 and 548:
Author Year QA Farely 2002 62 Good
Page 549 and 550:
Author Year QA Fowles 2000 63 Good
Page 551 and 552:
Page 553 and 554:
Page 555 and 556:
Author Year QA Jung 2010 68 Good Kn
Page 557 and 558:
Author Year QA 11. Results: KQ1: (H
Page 559 and 560:
Author Year QA Pham 2002 73 Good 11
Page 561 and 562:
Author Year QA Tae-Seale 2004 76 Fa
Page 563 and 564:
Appendix M. Health Plans: Qualitati
Page 565 and 566:
Author Year Farley-Short 2002 162 1
Page 567 and 568:
Author Year Gabel 1998 163 1. Study
Page 569 and 570:
Author Year Gibbs 1996 164 1. Study
Page 571 and 572:
Author Year 1. Study Purpose 2. Geo
Page 573 and 574:
Author Year Harris- Koejetin 2000 1
Page 575 and 576:
Author Year Hibbard 1997 171 1. Stu
Page 577 and 578:
Page 579 and 580:
Page 581 and 582:
Page 583 and 584:
Author Year Hibbard 2001 178 Hibbar
Page 585 and 586:
Page 587 and 588:
Author Year Paulsbo 2007 183 Peters
Page 589 and 590:
Author Year Rosenthal 2007 186 1. S
Page 591 and 592:
Author Year Scanlon 2001 188 1. Stu
Page 593 and 594:
Author Year Spranca 2000 190 1. Stu
Page 595 and 596:
Author Year Teleki 2007 192 1. Stud
Page 597 and 598:
Author Year Uhrig 2006 194 1. Study
Page 599 and 600:
Section A Appendix N. Long-Term Car
Page 601 and 602:
Author Year Jung 2010 85 Konetzka 2
Page 603 and 604:
Author Year Werner 2009a 92 Werner
Page 605 and 606:
Author Year Zinn 2010 99 1. Study P
Page 607 and 608:
Author Year Castle 2007 79 Cont. 11
Page 609 and 610:
Author Year Castle 2010 81 11. Resu
Page 611 and 612:
Author Year Jung 2010 85 11. Result
Page 613 and 614:
Author Year Mukamel 2008 86 Mukamel
Page 615 and 616:
Author Year Park 2011 b 90 11. Resu
Page 617 and 618:
Author Year Werner 2009 b 93 11. Re
Page 619 and 620:
Author Year Werner 2010 94 Werner 2
Page 621 and 622:
Author Year Zinn 2005 97 11. Result
Page 623 and 624:
Author Year Zinn 2010 99 11. Result
Page 625 and 626:
Appendix O. Long-Term Care: Qualita
Page 627 and 628:
Author Year Castle 2005 197 1. Stud
Page 629 and 630:
Author Year Gerteis 2007 198 1. Stu
Page 631 and 632:
Page 633 and 634:
Page 635 and 636:
References 1. AHRQ. Methods Guide f
Page 637 and 638:
36. Pope DG. Reacting to rankings:
Page 639 and 640:
77. Wedig GJ, Tai-Seale M. The effe
Page 641 and 642:
118. Laschober M, Maxfield M, Felt-
Page 643 and 644:
157. Pettijohn TL, Lawrence ME. The
Page 645:
198. Gerteis M, Gerteis JS, Newman
show all

5. Public Reporting as a Quality Improvement Strategy

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?