23.08.2013 Views

5. Public Reporting as a Quality Improvement Strategy

5. Public Reporting as a Quality Improvement Strategy

5. Public Reporting as a Quality Improvement Strategy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Author<br />

Year<br />

Paulsbo<br />

2007 183<br />

Peters<br />

2009 184<br />

1. Study<br />

Purpose<br />

To explore report<br />

card preferences<br />

of people with<br />

disabilities<br />

Examine the<br />

impact of<br />

evaluative<br />

meaning on the<br />

2. Geographic<br />

Location<br />

Oregon, California,<br />

Virginia, Maryland,<br />

and DC<br />

3. Study<br />

Design/<br />

Type<br />

Focus<br />

Groups<br />

USA Lab-type<br />

Experiment<br />

4. Sample/<br />

Population<br />

Procedure <strong>5.</strong> Outcomes<br />

N=49 people;<br />

34 women, 15<br />

men recruited<br />

through<br />

independent<br />

living centers<br />

Study 1: 303<br />

non student<br />

adults<br />

Study 2: 207<br />

equipment and<br />

prescription<br />

drugs; and<br />

(5)dimensions of<br />

a high quality<br />

health care plan<br />

Defining quality<br />

health care<br />

including:<br />

Care<br />

coordination and<br />

communication<br />

Choice of<br />

providers<br />

Disability<br />

competence and<br />

sensitivity<br />

Access to<br />

information<br />

Evaluation or<br />

report card<br />

content<br />

Comprehension<br />

Use of<br />

information<br />

Impact of<br />

M-25<br />

6. Name<br />

of <strong>Public</strong><br />

Report 7. Results 8. Summary<br />

Reports<br />

from<br />

California,<br />

Maryland,<br />

Michigan<br />

and Tex<strong>as</strong><br />

important:<br />

Provider panel with<br />

appropriate accessible<br />

specialists<br />

E<strong>as</strong>e of referral<br />

Transportation and<br />

physically accessible<br />

offices<br />

Medications on formulary<br />

Equipment and models<br />

covered<br />

Independent living needs<br />

covered<br />

Maintenance (not<br />

improvement) and<br />

alternative therapies<br />

covered<br />

Coordination of Care<br />

Access to preventive<br />

services<br />

Health plan information<br />

in alternative formats<br />

Responsive appeals<br />

process<br />

Most participants<br />

preferred shorter report<br />

cards and wanted<br />

number and visuals.<br />

Some did not understand<br />

stars or composite<br />

ratings. Most wanted<br />

disability specific<br />

information and provider<br />

specific, not just health<br />

plan ratings. They also<br />

wanted information on<br />

the coordination of care<br />

and accessibility of<br />

facilities.<br />

NA Study 1: Mood and<br />

numeracy impact<br />

interpretation when no<br />

categories are provided;<br />

Finding confirm<br />

other studies that<br />

demonstrate that<br />

format can help<br />

or confuse and<br />

that people want<br />

information<br />

specific to there<br />

situation or<br />

condition.<br />

Presenting<br />

evaluative<br />

information<br />

allows people to<br />

9. Funding of<br />

Research<br />

U.S.<br />

Department of<br />

Education<br />

Robert Wood<br />

Johnson<br />

Foundation, the<br />

National

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!