23.08.2013 Views

5. Public Reporting as a Quality Improvement Strategy

5. Public Reporting as a Quality Improvement Strategy

5. Public Reporting as a Quality Improvement Strategy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table H1. Hospital quantitative studies: columns 1-8 of 18 (pages H-1 to H-18) (continued)<br />

1. Study Purpose<br />

7. <strong>Public</strong><br />

Report Name 8. Context:<br />

Author, Year and/or a priori 2. Geographic 3. Study 4. Sample/ <strong>5.</strong> Primary<br />

and<br />

Environment<br />

(QA)<br />

Hypothesis: Location design Population Comparison 6. Outcomes Description* Characteristics<br />

Peterson<br />

1998 35<br />

To examine the<br />

effects of provider<br />

New York Interrupted<br />

Time Series<br />

All Medicare<br />

patients age<br />

2 yrs Pre-public<br />

reporting: 1987-89<br />

1. Percentage of<br />

patients going out-<br />

NY CSRS None<br />

(Good) profiling on byp<strong>as</strong>s<br />

>=65 yrs who 2 yrs Post-public of-state for byp<strong>as</strong>s<br />

surgery access and<br />

underwent reporting: 1990-92 surgery<br />

outcomes in elderly<br />

byp<strong>as</strong>s surgery<br />

2. Use of byp<strong>as</strong>s<br />

patients in New<br />

between 1987<br />

surgery following a<br />

York<br />

and 1992 in a<br />

MI had declined in<br />

US hospital.<br />

NY’s elderly since<br />

n=39,396 in NY<br />

the initiation of<br />

Hospitals<br />

report cards<br />

n=662,675 in<br />

3. Whether byp<strong>as</strong>s<br />

non-NY (US)<br />

surgery outcomes<br />

were improving<br />

more rapidly in NY<br />

that in the rest of<br />

the nation.<br />

Pope<br />

2009 36<br />

Estimate the effect<br />

of the US News<br />

CA and rest of<br />

USA<br />

Time Series<br />

Post Test<br />

All hospitalized<br />

Medicare<br />

Comparing the<br />

USNWR ranking by<br />

Number of<br />

patients (volume)<br />

USNWR h<strong>as</strong><br />

Specialty and<br />

None<br />

(Fair) and World<br />

Only patients in specialty starting in and revenue Hospital-level<br />

Report hospital<br />

California 1993 to 1994-2002 in generated from data<br />

rankings on both<br />

(1998–2004) rest of the country patients.<br />

patient volume and<br />

and a sample of and 1998 to 2004 in<br />

hospital revenues.<br />

other hospitals<br />

around the<br />

country (1994–<br />

2002)<br />

N=446<br />

California.<br />

Romano<br />

2004 37<br />

To determine<br />

whether hospitals<br />

New York and<br />

California<br />

Times Series<br />

Post Only<br />

Outlier hospitals Pre: monthly volume<br />

in New York and prior to report for<br />

Volume: total CHOP (CA)<br />

number of patients and CSRS<br />

Both states require<br />

public reporting<br />

(Good) recognized <strong>as</strong><br />

California NY each specific hospital with a topic (NY)<br />

performance<br />

using CSRS Post: monthly volume condition or<br />

outliers (either<br />

report from for each specific procedure, or<br />

lower or higher<br />

December 1992, hospital up to a year related condition<br />

than expected)<br />

December 1993, later<br />

or procedure, who<br />

experience volume<br />

and June<br />

were admitted to a<br />

changes after<br />

1995CA using<br />

specific hospital in<br />

publication of a<br />

CHOP report<br />

a specific calendar<br />

report card.<br />

from December<br />

1993 and from<br />

month.<br />

H1: Hospitals with<br />

May 1996<br />

CA Hospitals<br />

lower-than-<br />

volume by:<br />

H-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!