Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things

More documents

Recommendations

Info

T he Global RFID Interoperability Forum for Standards (GRIFS) is a Support Action Project funded by the European Commission’s FP7 Programme with the aim to improve collaboration and thereby to maximise the global interoperability of RFID standards. This two year project started in January 2008 and is run by GS1 (project coordinator), CEN and ETSI. Project objectives A world of global supply chains requires that RFID tags and associated sensors can operate, can be seen and can be interrogated anywhere. For maximum competitiveness and greatest efficiency this requires standards that are global in definition and in application. The GRIFS project aims at initiating a forum that will continue to work constructively and grow after the end of the project through a Memorandum of Understanding between key global standard organisations active in RFID. This Forum should improve the collaboration between standards organisations and increase interoperability of standards. Project activities GRIFS is undertaking the following work to achieve its objective: Analyse the national, regional and global RFID standardisation activities. The team has built up an online database listing more than 160 RFID standards. Several workshops and other actions have been organised at regional level to raise awareness and to identify areas where standard development coordination might be required. Those workshops have helped to prepare the creation of the GRIFS forum. A GRIFS forum has been launched and four forum meetings are being organised in the regions of Asia, America and Europe. The final forum meeting in Europe will aim to cement the Memorandum of Under- standing and ensure that the GRIFS forum will be viable and will be able to continue to operate beyond the end of this support action. This support action is focusing on the use of RFID in supply chain and related activities. These activities primarily encompass the tracking and tracing of physical items as they move through supply chains in many different businesses, both in the public and private sector. The forum will continue to enable exchanges of views on all aspects of RFID interoperability from the perspective of standardisation, thus facilitating a coherent and consistent global RFID standardisation policy. Further information: GRIFS Global RFID Interoperability Forum for Standards Partners: GS1, CEN, ETSI Contact: GS1 Avenue Louise 326 – Bte 10; B-1050 Brussels ; Belgium Tel.: +32-278-87800 E-mail: info@grifs-project.eu Internet: www.grifs-project.eu Duration: 01.01.2008 – 31.12.2009 - 24 Months CERP-IoT – Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things 210
T he first objective of the Hydra project is to develop middleware based on a Service-oriented chitecture, to which the underlying communication layer is transparent. The middleware will include support for distributed as well as centralised architectures, security and trust, flective properties and model-driven development of applications. The HYDRA middleware will be deployable on both new and existing networks of distributed wireless and wired devices, which operate with limited resources in terms of computing power, energy and memory usage. It will allow for secure, trustworthy, and fault tolerant applications. The embedded and mobile Service-oriented Architecture will provide interoperable access to data, information and knowledge across heterogeneous platforms supporting true ambient intelligence for ubiquitous networked devices. The second objective of the Hydra project will produce two tools that will simplify the development process based on the Hydra middleware, a software- and a device development kit (SDK/DDK) to be used by developers. Project description Embedded Systems denotes invisible modular systems that are combined to form complex higher-order systems and are used, e.g., in motor vehicles, airplanes, "intelligent" buildings or home multimedia systems. Advanced applications in these fields require to network growing numbers of devices, typically from more than just a few manufacturers. Given the plethora of heterogeneous devices, sensors and actuators in the field, the large number of manufacturers and the differences in their speed of innovation, there is an urgent need for technologies and tools that make it easier to reap the benefits of networked systems. And the complexity to build such technologies and tools grows exponentially with the number of devices, manufacturers and protocols involved. Further information: Hydra Networked Embedded System Middleware for Heterogeneous Physical Devices in a Distributed Architecture For this situation Hydra develops a middleware that will help manufacturers and systems integrators to build devices that can be networked easily and flexibly to create costeffective high performance solutions. The results will reduce design complexity by providing well-defined open interfaces between types of devices. The Hydra middleware will have a transparent communication layer, equally supporting centralized and distributed architectures. The Hydra middleware takes security and trust into account and will allow building modelguided web services. It will run on wired or wireless networks of distributed devices with limited resources. The embedded and mobile service-oriented architecture will provide fully compatible data access across heterogeneous platforms, allowing to create true ambient intelligence for ubiquitous networked devices. Partners: Aarhus Universitet, CNET SVENSKA, Fraunhofer SIT, In-JET, Innova, Siemens, T- Connect, Technicka Univerzita Kosiciach, Telefonica I&D, University of Paderborn, University of Reading Contact: Dr. Markus Eisenhauer; Fraunhofer FIT Schloss Birlinghoven; D-53754 Sankt Augustin Germany Tel.: +49-224-1142 859 E-mail: Markus.eisenhauer@fit.fraunhofer.de Internet: www.hydramiddleware.eu Duration: 01.06.2006 – 31.10.2010 - 52 Months CERP-IoT – Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things 211
Page 1 and 2:
Vision and Challenges for Realising
Page 3 and 4:
Foreword Vision and Challenges for
Page 5 and 6:
Table of contents Foreword Vision a
Page 7 and 8:
1 Organization ....................
Page 9:
Chapter 1 The Internet of Things
Page 12 and 13:
1 Origin of the concept of "Interne
Page 14 and 15:
2.1 Research perspective Today the
Page 16 and 17:
(RFID), Near Field Communication (N
Page 18 and 19:
According to SRI Consulting Busines
Page 20 and 21:
Security and software Human interfa
Page 22 and 23:
According to ISTAG, technical resea
Page 24 and 25:
ties can be grouped around two axes
Page 26 and 27:
emerging uses and services, and lau
Page 29:
Chapter 2 The CERP-IoT Cluster
Page 32 and 33:
floor, and other things happening i
Page 34 and 35:
eral solutions have emerged, either
Page 36 and 37:
Acronym Project Title Coordinator H
Page 39:
Chapter 3 Strategic Research Agenda
Page 42 and 43:
Safety, Security and Privacy, Envi
Page 44 and 45:
dynamically extended and improved b
Page 46 and 47:
Domain 1 Fundamental characteristic
Page 49 and 50:
T he concept of Internet of Things
Page 51 and 52:
The vehicle itself is also consider
Page 53 and 54:
technology should foster a communit
Page 55 and 56:
Every day millions of people move u
Page 57 and 58:
3.3 Technologies supporting the Int
Page 59 and 60:
The traffic in the Internet of Thin
Page 61 and 62:
Coverage - sparse, dense or redunda
Page 63 and 64:
IoT will create new services and ne
Page 65 and 66:
including the virtual counterparts
Page 67:
Issues to be addressed: Event-driv
Page 70 and 71:
competitive marketplace that benefi
Page 72 and 73:
equired for IoT applications. Such
Page 74 and 75:
ility of things in their acting wil
Page 76 and 77:
Before 2010 2010-2015 2015-2020 Bey
Page 78 and 79:
Before 2010 2010-2015 2015-2020 Bey
Page 80 and 81:
Before 2010 2010-2015 2015-2020 Bey
Page 82 and 83:
Acknowledgements Many colleagues ha
Page 84 and 85:
T eams from research projects and i
Page 86 and 87:
should help brand owners to find th
Page 88 and 89:
3.1 Authentication Features For eac
Page 90 and 91:
4 Business Process Integration Seam
Page 93 and 94:
4.2 Challenges for Usage of Network
Page 95 and 96:
esent one step in the supply chain,
Page 97 and 98:
A reaction of things could be trigg
Page 99 and 100:
Table 4.2-1: Application Case Featu
Page 101 and 102:
NDEI- Service InformationBrokerage
Page 103:
7 References [Barry02] Barry, Dougl
Page 106 and 107:
data to a central server. When used
Page 108 and 109:
The smart retail concept holds simi
Page 110 and 111:
6 Acknowledgment The authors would
Page 112 and 113:
Nevertheless, the majority of exist
Page 114 and 115:
To implement this service, case and
Page 116 and 117:
moving it from the reader’s anten
Page 118 and 119:
The servers can process requests in
Page 120 and 121:
web client. The solution largely re
Page 122 and 123:
ently, establishing transparency ac
Page 124 and 125:
Kourouthanassis, P., & Roussos, G.
Page 126 and 127:
The importance of identity manageme
Page 128 and 129:
Middleware and other software devel
Page 130 and 131:
1.2 Objectives The objective of the
Page 132 and 133:
Air interfaces still do have differ
Page 134 and 135:
4.2.3 ITU-T ITU is the United Natio
Page 136 and 137:
The report's conclusion highlights
Page 138 and 139:
made significant progress on the de
Page 140 and 141:
Finally, a more theoretical researc
Page 142 and 143:
monitoring that manufactured goods
Page 144 and 145:
worked RFID technology for various
Page 146 and 147:
tually sold, at which moment in tim
Page 148 and 149:
Business case analysis: Two busines
Page 150 and 151:
of far field and near field UHF tag
Page 152 and 153:
The manufacturing pilot provided sy
Page 154 and 155:
also coming from distributed electr
Page 156 and 157:
The ASPIRE architecture identifies
Page 158 and 159:
ASPIRE Innovative filtering solutio
Page 160 and 161: 3.2 Semantic Device Discovery and O
Page 162 and 163: Concretely, Hydra uses web services
Page 165 and 166: 4.9 Usage of RFID in the Forest & W
Page 167 and 168: sufficiently long and consistent re
Page 169 and 170: The purpose of Traceability Service
Page 171 and 172: An overview of the LCA procedure, c
Page 173: The environmental KPIs harmonize wi
Page 176 and 177: 5. Involving a large number of Memb
Page 178 and 179: Maintain a roadmap of the relevant
Page 180 and 181: 4 Members The RACE networkRFID comm
Page 182 and 183: EPoSS has close links with other ET
Page 184 and 185: Social context Surrounding people
Page 186 and 187: 2.5 Interoperability It is common k
Page 188 and 189: fraction of the time. RFID technolo
Page 190 and 191: The middleware solutions for these
Page 193 and 194: T he AmI-4-SME project is addressin
Page 195 and 196: BRIDGE (Building Radio frequency ID
Page 197 and 198: T oday’s Internet is rapidly evol
Page 199 and 200: T he CoBIs project developed a radi
Page 201 and 202: C uteLoop has the strategic objecti
Page 203 and 204: T he DiY Smart Experiences project
Page 205 and 206: T he project objectives of DYNA- MI
Page 207 and 208: epresentatives of the Member States
Page 209: Approach The EURIDICE platform will
Page 213 and 214: This will produce new inputs to set
Page 215 and 216: IMS2020 strives for strengthening i
Page 217 and 218: L eapfrog is a joint research and i
Page 219 and 220: F easibility study for an improved
Page 221 and 222: R FID will form the basis of better
Page 223 and 224: T he SMART project employees RFID t
Page 225 and 226: T he StoLPaN project aims to define
Page 227 and 228: T he recently completed three-year
Page 229: Expected Impact WALTER is aimed at
Page 235 and 236: Free publications: HOW TO GET EU PU
show all

Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?