26.08.2013 Views

External Evaluation of the European Baccalaureate (Annexes)

External Evaluation of the European Baccalaureate (Annexes)

External Evaluation of the European Baccalaureate (Annexes)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The specification <strong>of</strong> curriculum is lighter in EB than in France and seems to allow more autonomy to teachers in <strong>the</strong><br />

choice <strong>of</strong> methods and support.<br />

The level required at French bac seems to be much more scientific and demanding.<br />

The objectives seem to be clearer in EB, principally because <strong>the</strong>ir presentation is simpler and more precise.<br />

Regarding content<br />

The topics studied in <strong>the</strong> respective qualifications are very different, both in content and level required - <strong>the</strong><br />

comparison in relation to precise standards is thus difficult.<br />

In conclusion, <strong>the</strong> approaches <strong>of</strong> each formation are very different: time, topics, concepts, and content.<br />

2. The assessments in <strong>the</strong> respective qualifications<br />

2.1. In <strong>the</strong> French bac:<br />

Requirements <strong>of</strong> bac S are presented in an text additional to <strong>the</strong> syllabus.<br />

The marking scheme is composed <strong>of</strong> two parts:<br />

The written examination (3 h): this values reproduction <strong>of</strong> knowledge and aptitude for scientific reasoning; 16 points<br />

Abilities to develop scientific experiences (practical work) is valued in continuous assessment; 20 points. 25<br />

situations <strong>of</strong> assessment are defined by <strong>the</strong> ministry and are published three months before <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> school<br />

year.<br />

2008 – session<br />

The written examination consists <strong>of</strong> three parts: each question is very short and based on documents given in <strong>the</strong><br />

question paper. The objective is to value <strong>the</strong> ability to build a scientific argument and undertake scientific reasoning.<br />

For example, expose how... or, from <strong>the</strong> documents and with your knowledge, discuss why...<br />

The requirement is to produce structured scientific argument.<br />

Abilities to develop scientific experiences (practical work): <strong>the</strong> list is presented in two columns: first, specification <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> assessment context; second, specifications about activity and outcomes required. There are many topics and so,<br />

it is impossible that candidates can simply learn every topic by heart.<br />

2.2. Within <strong>the</strong> EB<br />

In year 7, <strong>the</strong> Bac consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> A-mark based on oral participation and written work, and <strong>the</strong> B-mark established by<br />

<strong>the</strong> written examination in January. Students can also choose to sit <strong>the</strong> written or <strong>the</strong> oral examination in <strong>the</strong> Bac.<br />

Guidelines for <strong>the</strong> setting <strong>of</strong> baccalaureate questions are given: six points. For example, translations into different<br />

languages must scrupulously follow <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> each question.<br />

2007-session:<br />

3 hours<br />

There are 16 pages in <strong>the</strong> QP: two exercises P; two exercises G (Genetic) and two exercises E (Evolution).<br />

Candidates must choose one exercise P, one exercise G, one exercise E.<br />

Each exercise is composed <strong>of</strong> a double-sheet with texts and diagrams.<br />

Each exercise consists <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> questions. For example, in P1, four questions: two sub questions in first<br />

question, three in <strong>the</strong> third one, and five in <strong>the</strong> fourth one.<br />

The answers expected are a scientific text: <strong>the</strong> focus is on <strong>the</strong> ability to construct scientific reasoning about biology.<br />

In comparison with <strong>the</strong> syllabus, exercises seem very demanding and lack articulation with <strong>the</strong> specifics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

specification.<br />

5.4 2.3. Comparison<br />

The two question papers are very different: very short and without choice within <strong>the</strong> French bac, and very long, with<br />

choices within <strong>the</strong> EB.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> two question papers, <strong>the</strong> principal outcome required is a form <strong>of</strong> scientific reasoning<br />

Page <strong>of</strong> 216<br />

195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!