External Evaluation of the European Baccalaureate (Annexes)
External Evaluation of the European Baccalaureate (Annexes)
External Evaluation of the European Baccalaureate (Annexes)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The specification <strong>of</strong> curriculum is lighter in EB than in France and seems to allow more autonomy to teachers in <strong>the</strong><br />
choice <strong>of</strong> methods and support.<br />
The level required at French bac seems to be much more scientific and demanding.<br />
The objectives seem to be clearer in EB, principally because <strong>the</strong>ir presentation is simpler and more precise.<br />
Regarding content<br />
The topics studied in <strong>the</strong> respective qualifications are very different, both in content and level required - <strong>the</strong><br />
comparison in relation to precise standards is thus difficult.<br />
In conclusion, <strong>the</strong> approaches <strong>of</strong> each formation are very different: time, topics, concepts, and content.<br />
2. The assessments in <strong>the</strong> respective qualifications<br />
2.1. In <strong>the</strong> French bac:<br />
Requirements <strong>of</strong> bac S are presented in an text additional to <strong>the</strong> syllabus.<br />
The marking scheme is composed <strong>of</strong> two parts:<br />
The written examination (3 h): this values reproduction <strong>of</strong> knowledge and aptitude for scientific reasoning; 16 points<br />
Abilities to develop scientific experiences (practical work) is valued in continuous assessment; 20 points. 25<br />
situations <strong>of</strong> assessment are defined by <strong>the</strong> ministry and are published three months before <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> school<br />
year.<br />
2008 – session<br />
The written examination consists <strong>of</strong> three parts: each question is very short and based on documents given in <strong>the</strong><br />
question paper. The objective is to value <strong>the</strong> ability to build a scientific argument and undertake scientific reasoning.<br />
For example, expose how... or, from <strong>the</strong> documents and with your knowledge, discuss why...<br />
The requirement is to produce structured scientific argument.<br />
Abilities to develop scientific experiences (practical work): <strong>the</strong> list is presented in two columns: first, specification <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> assessment context; second, specifications about activity and outcomes required. There are many topics and so,<br />
it is impossible that candidates can simply learn every topic by heart.<br />
2.2. Within <strong>the</strong> EB<br />
In year 7, <strong>the</strong> Bac consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> A-mark based on oral participation and written work, and <strong>the</strong> B-mark established by<br />
<strong>the</strong> written examination in January. Students can also choose to sit <strong>the</strong> written or <strong>the</strong> oral examination in <strong>the</strong> Bac.<br />
Guidelines for <strong>the</strong> setting <strong>of</strong> baccalaureate questions are given: six points. For example, translations into different<br />
languages must scrupulously follow <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> each question.<br />
2007-session:<br />
3 hours<br />
There are 16 pages in <strong>the</strong> QP: two exercises P; two exercises G (Genetic) and two exercises E (Evolution).<br />
Candidates must choose one exercise P, one exercise G, one exercise E.<br />
Each exercise is composed <strong>of</strong> a double-sheet with texts and diagrams.<br />
Each exercise consists <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> questions. For example, in P1, four questions: two sub questions in first<br />
question, three in <strong>the</strong> third one, and five in <strong>the</strong> fourth one.<br />
The answers expected are a scientific text: <strong>the</strong> focus is on <strong>the</strong> ability to construct scientific reasoning about biology.<br />
In comparison with <strong>the</strong> syllabus, exercises seem very demanding and lack articulation with <strong>the</strong> specifics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
specification.<br />
5.4 2.3. Comparison<br />
The two question papers are very different: very short and without choice within <strong>the</strong> French bac, and very long, with<br />
choices within <strong>the</strong> EB.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> two question papers, <strong>the</strong> principal outcome required is a form <strong>of</strong> scientific reasoning<br />
Page <strong>of</strong> 216<br />
195