Journal of European Integration History - Centre d'études et de ...
Journal of European Integration History - Centre d'études et de ...
Journal of European Integration History - Centre d'études et de ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Book reviews – Comptes rendus – Buchbesprechungen 175<br />
munists, acting as spokesmen <strong>of</strong> the Kremlin (p.178). To the orthodox position <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PCF, Togliatti opposed his polycentrism, part <strong>of</strong> a wi<strong>de</strong> project to build up a <strong>European</strong><br />
regional n<strong>et</strong>work <strong>of</strong> the Communist Parties (p.107). Facing this topic, Cruciani<br />
seemed to anticipate a political project apparently very similar to the Euro communist,<br />
proposed by Enrico Berlinguer in the second half <strong>of</strong> the 1970s. While this perspective<br />
is fascinating and provi<strong>de</strong>s the theor<strong>et</strong>ical basis for the further <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PCI two <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s after, one must also accept that the position Togliatti held towards<br />
international key events <strong>of</strong> the 1950s – such as the Hungarian crisis – cannot be<br />
consi<strong>de</strong>red apart from the whole Italian communists’ strategy <strong>of</strong> those years. The<br />
“external tie” had a strong weight in <strong>de</strong>fining the international policy <strong>of</strong> the PCI; but<br />
also the Italian Communists forma mentis as well as the personal stories <strong>of</strong> the lea<strong>de</strong>rs<br />
were important in accepting the Sovi<strong>et</strong> “solution” <strong>of</strong> the Hungarian crisis.<br />
Dealing with the i<strong>de</strong>a <strong>of</strong> differences b<strong>et</strong>ween the PCI and the PCF, about their<br />
behaviour towards the tra<strong>de</strong> unions, additional information is nee<strong>de</strong>d. L<strong>et</strong> us point<br />
out the strong disagreement b<strong>et</strong>ween Togliatti and the CGIL lea<strong>de</strong>r Giuseppe Di Vittorio:<br />
Bruno Trentin, lea<strong>de</strong>r <strong>of</strong> the Italian tra<strong>de</strong> union in the 1970s, ma<strong>de</strong> aware that<br />
the ruling class <strong>of</strong> the PCI wished to discredit the lea<strong>de</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> Di Vittorio, informing<br />
the CPSU about the existence <strong>of</strong> groups which supported the revolt <strong>of</strong> Budapest<br />
(Trentin, 2006). The harsh confrontation b<strong>et</strong>ween the two lea<strong>de</strong>rs make difficult to<br />
accept that the general secr<strong>et</strong>ary <strong>of</strong> the PCI “was in tune” with Di Vittorio, and that<br />
they began “to play <strong>of</strong>f the cushion in or<strong>de</strong>r to strengthen the polycentrism within the<br />
International Communist Movement” (p.226).<br />
Concluding, “L’Europa <strong>de</strong>lle Sinistre” can be consi<strong>de</strong>red an ambitious book. A<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> five political actors was undoubtedly hard to face; and, to a certain<br />
extent, the volume is affected by such a difficulty. The quantity <strong>of</strong> political actors<br />
consi<strong>de</strong>red, som<strong>et</strong>imes brings the author to remain on the very surface. It must<br />
non<strong>et</strong>heless recognized that this book will open the floor to further studies about this<br />
relevant topic.<br />
Valentine Lomellini<br />
Dipartimento di Studi Internazionali, Università di Padova<br />
Antonio VARSORI (a cura di), Alle origini <strong>de</strong>l presente. L'Europa occi<strong>de</strong>ntale<br />
nella crisi <strong>de</strong>gli anni S<strong>et</strong>tanta, Franco Angeli, Milano, 2007, 304 p. – ISBN<br />
978-88-464-8197-9 – 21,00 €.<br />
The traditional cliché about the 1970s in Europe – that <strong>of</strong> a merely transitional <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong><br />
characterised by stagnation – is slowly beginning to be nuanced by historians. Recent<br />
publications, like John Gilligham's <strong>European</strong> integration, 1950-2003 or Richard<br />
Griffith's chapter in Desmond Dinan's volume on the Origins and evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>European</strong> Union do hint at the fact that the old cliché <strong>of</strong> overlooking the 1970s is