22.09.2013 Views

Journal of European Integration History - Centre d'études et de ...

Journal of European Integration History - Centre d'études et de ...

Journal of European Integration History - Centre d'études et de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jean Monn<strong>et</strong>’s Grand Design for Europe and its Criticism 39<br />

power in the nin<strong>et</strong>eenth century, wherein the US-Europe holy alliance would enjoy<br />

the dominant position. This world concert should be composed <strong>of</strong> the US, unified<br />

Europe and non-Western powers. This trio would discuss and work tog<strong>et</strong>her to maintain<br />

world peace and resolve conflicts on all corners <strong>of</strong> the globe. According to Monn<strong>et</strong>,<br />

it was exactly this Western unity around the United States that forced the Sovi<strong>et</strong><br />

Union to withdraw missiles from Cuba, which was a “historical <strong>de</strong>velopment”. 45<br />

<strong>European</strong> strategy in this world concert would therefore evolve in parallel with<br />

the process <strong>of</strong> unification. In issues touching on integration, Europe should act energ<strong>et</strong>ically<br />

to ally with the US and to d<strong>et</strong>er non-Western powers. “The partnership<br />

b<strong>et</strong>ween America and a united Europe must be a relationship <strong>of</strong> two separate but<br />

equally powerful entities”, Monn<strong>et</strong> <strong>de</strong>clared in 1962, “each bearing its share <strong>of</strong> common<br />

responsibilities in the world”. 46 In those issues where <strong>European</strong>s still failed to<br />

integrate their sovereign rights, Monn<strong>et</strong> seemed to prefer that <strong>European</strong> countries<br />

adopt a low pr<strong>of</strong>ile, support American strategy vis-à-vis non-Western powers, and<br />

pay more attention to its own integration processes. Following the same logic in his<br />

project to create a trans-Atlantic alliance, he believed that a divi<strong>de</strong>d Europe could not<br />

only fail to have equality with the US in the bilateral alliance but would also carry<br />

no weight in the trio <strong>of</strong> powers. Un<strong>de</strong>r such circumstances, a divi<strong>de</strong>d Europe had no<br />

choice but to accept American lea<strong>de</strong>rship in the alliance and follow American policies<br />

in the world concert. Accordingly, he dissua<strong>de</strong>d <strong>European</strong> contemporaries from paying<br />

too much attention to the former Sovi<strong>et</strong> Union.<br />

“I am sure if we pay all attention to our own work, we will compl<strong>et</strong>e the <strong>European</strong> unity<br />

including the British and create a partnership with the Americans. When these works are<br />

accomplished, many problems that we are worried about today will be then solved automatically”.<br />

47<br />

In his grand <strong>de</strong>sign, <strong>European</strong> unity was the starting point and a key factor that might<br />

modify global geopolitics.<br />

III. Criticism<br />

Supranational elitism<br />

Monn<strong>et</strong> was evi<strong>de</strong>ntly a fe<strong>de</strong>ralist whose ambition was to create a <strong>European</strong> superstate<br />

dominated by a supranational administration since the Schuman Plan had been<br />

presented. 48 To govern this new super-state, Monn<strong>et</strong> preferred, in early 1950s, to<br />

45. E. ROUSSEL, Jean Monn<strong>et</strong>, Fayard, Paris, 1996, p.766.<br />

46. J. MONNET, Memoirs, translated by Richard Mayne, Collins, London, 1978, p.443.<br />

47. FJM, AML 292.<br />

48. F. DUCHÊNE, op.cit., p.369.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!