Visitor studies bibliography - European Association of Zoos and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Primate exhibits: visitor studies BLANEY (E.C.) & WELLS (D.L.), 2004: The influence of a camouflage net barrier on the behaviour, welfare and public perceptions of zoo-housed gorillas. Animal Welfare 13: 111-18. BODAMER (M.D.) SANKOVIC (J.M.), 2001: “We’re all cousins!” A sampling of public comments at a zoo, reflecting people’s sibling relationship with chimpanzees. In: The Apes, challenges of the 21 st Century. May 10-13, 2000. Conf. proc.. Brookfield, Chicago Zool. Soc.: 199-206. www.brookfieldzoo.org/pagegen/inc/ACBodamer.pdf CLARKE (G.K.), 1986: The inside story. Visitor Behav. 1(1): 5. http://historicalvoices.org/pbuilder/pbfiles/Project38/Scheme325/VSA-a0a0u0-a_5730.pdf MAPLE (T.) & FINLAY (T.), 1986: Evaluating the environments of captive nonhuman primates. In: BENIRSCHKE (K.) (ed.): Primates: The road to self-sustaining populations. New York, Springer: 479-88. MELUCH (W.) & ROUTMAN (E.O.), 2004a: Inspiring caring: measuring the impact of the Lemur Forest experience. AZA Ann. Conf. Proc.. www.aza.org/AZAPublications/2004proceedings/. MELUCH (W.) & ROUTMAN (E.O.), 2004b: Lemur Forest summative evaluation. Curr. Trends Audience Res. Eval. 17: 33-39. MITCHELL (G.), OBRADOVICH (S.), SUMNER (D.), DEMORRIS (K.), LOFTON (L.), MINOR (J.), COTTON (L.) & FOSTER (T.), 1990: Cage location effects on visitor attendance at three Sacramento Zoo mangabey enclosures. Zoo Biology 9(1): 55-63. MOSS (A.), ESSON (M.) & FRANCIS (D.), 2010: Evaluation of a 3 rd generation zoo exhibit in relation to visitor behavior and interpretation use. J. Interp. Res. 15(2): 11-28. NAKAMICHI (M.), 2007: Assessing the effects of new primate exhibits on zoo visitors’ attitudes and perceptions by using three different assessment methods. Anthrozoos 20: 155-65. NOTÓ (M.J.), TOMAS (G.N.), ALONSO (C.S.) & FUENTES (F.N.), 1993: Captive lowland gorillas and visitors at Barcelona Zoo. IZE J. 28: 38-40. PLOWMAN (A.), 2007: Effect of old and new enclosures on visitor attitudes to monkeys and their conservation. Zoo Res. News – BIAZA Res. Newsletter 7(1) : RAJENDRAN (S.), SASEENDRAN (P.C.) & CHITRA (R.), 2003: Visitors’ behaviour at primate cages in the Zoological Gardens, Thrissur. Zoos’ Print 18(6): 14. ROSS (S.) & LUKAS (K.), 2001: Conducting a post-occupancy evaluation as part of the design process for a new great ape facility. In: The Apes, challenges of the 21 st Century. May 10-13, 2000. Conf. proc.. Brookfield, Chicago Zool. Soc.: 140-41. www.brookfieldzoo.org/pagegen/inc/ACRoss.pdf ROSS (S.) & LUKAS (K.), 2005: Zoo visitor behavior at an African ape exhibit. Visitor Studies Today 8(1): 4-12. http://historicalvoices.org/pbuilder/pbfiles/Project38/Scheme325/VSA-a0a6a4-a_5730.pdf VENUGOPAL (B.) & SHA (A.), 1993: Visitor behaviour at Lion-tailed macaque in the Mysore Looking at people looking at animals – version 5.0 An international bibliography on visitor experience studies and exhibit evaluation in zoos and aquariums 320
Zoo. Zoo’s Print 8(12): 45-48. WORSTELL (C.) & FIBY (M.) (eds.), 2003: Reconciling user needs in animal exhibit design. Gorilla exhibits as a case study. Vienna, ZooLex. www.zoolex.org/publication/worstell/gorilla/content.html ON-GOING OR UNPUBLISHED STUDIES : DINGWALL (B.) & CULKIN (C.), 2009: Gorilla touch tables. Internship project. Toronto, Fleming College/Univ. of Toronto. Contact bonnie.dingwall@gmail.com ESSON (M.) & MOSS (A.), 2005: Conservation, canopies and kinship: the use of zoo exhibit design in engendering visitors' empathy for orangutans. 18 th ann. VSA conf., Aug. 2-6, 2005, Philadelphia, PA. Abstract: www.visitorstudiesarchives.org ESSON (M.), FRANCIS (D.) & MOSS (A.), 2007: Summative evaluation for visitor use of the Realm of the Red Ape exhibit at Chester Zoo (UK). Chester, Chester Zoo. Contact Maggie Esson, m.esson@chesterzoo.org GONÇALVES (A.F.), 2007: Os primatas do ZooLagos e a sua interacção com os visitantes – Parque Zoológico de Lagos. [The primates of ZooLagos and their interaction with the visitors.] Relatório final de estágio – Licenciatura em Biologia. Vila Real, Univ. de Trás-o-Montes e Alto Douro. 55 pp. JACOBS (L.), 2008: Visitor study in Apenheul – squirrel monkey area. Apeldoorn, Apenheul. OGDEN (J.), 1992: A comparative evaluation of naturalistic habitats for captive lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Unpublished doctoral diss.. Atlanta, Inst. of Technology. VANDEMOORTELE (H.), 2009: Bezoekersstudie bij de mensapen. Niet gepubliceerd projectwerk. [Visitors study at the apes. Unpublished project paper.] Sint-Niklaas, KaHoSL. 32 pp. BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: PRIMATE EXHIBITS BAKER (A.), 1999: PECO Primate Reserve at the Philadelphia Zoo: designing for animals and people. AZA Ann. Conf. Proc.: 207 BRUNER (G.) & MELLER (L.), 1992: Convergent evolution in design philosophy of gorilla habitats. Int. Zoo Yb. 31 : COE (J.) & MAPLE (T.), 1984: Approaching Eden: a behavioral basis for great ape exhibits. Proc. 1984 AAZPA. GIPPOLITI (S.), 2009: Primate zoo exhibits: what is their ecological message? Int. Zoo News 56(1): 12-16. JIAN (F.), JUN JIE (Z.), YU GE (L.), YAO JIE (L.), ZI SHUAI (X.) & KE DONG (T.), 2011: Design analysis of the gorilla building in zoos. Advanced Materials Res. 368-373: 3654-8. MUN (J.S.C.), KABILAN (B.), ALAGAPPASAMY (S.) & GUHA (B.), 2013: Benefits of naturalistic free ranging primate displays and implications for increased human primate interactions. Anthrozoos, 26(1): 13-26. www.ingentaconnect.com/content/berg/anthroz/2013/00000026/00000001/art00003 Looking at people looking at animals – version 5.0 An international bibliography on visitor experience studies and exhibit evaluation in zoos and aquariums 321
Page 1 and 2:
LOOKING AT PEOPLE LOOKING AT ANIMAL
Page 3 and 4:
we doing the best we can in interpr
Page 5 and 6:
HOW TO USE THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY? Unfor
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 HO
Page 9 and 10:
Attitudes to research in zoos 85 A
Page 11 and 12:
Museum and exhibition labels 214 L
Page 13 and 14:
o African exhibits 324 Reptile exh
Page 15 and 16:
DICK (R.E.), MCKEE (D.T.) & WAGAR (
Page 17 and 18:
papers, 1995 Visitor Studies Conf..
Page 19 and 20:
Marketing studies vs visitor experi
Page 21 and 22:
STAS (A.), 2010: Olifantenmarketing
Page 23 and 24:
Zoo visitor studies - general BERGM
Page 25 and 26:
WHITTALL (R.), 1992: A walk on the
Page 27 and 28:
Open: 152-55. HATLEY (J.), 1976: Th
Page 29 and 30:
2. VISITOR RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ON-
Page 31 and 32:
MCLUHAN (M.), 1964: Understanding m
Page 33 and 34:
Drawing, mind mapping in zoo evalua
Page 35 and 36:
Mass media influences on zoo and aq
Page 37 and 38:
Mass media influences on zoo and aq
Page 39 and 40:
FERGUSON (G.A.), 1981: Statistical
Page 41 and 42:
FINK (A.) & KOSECOFF (J.), 1998: Ho
Page 43 and 44:
3. SOCIAL, EDUCATIONAL AND ENVIRONM
Page 45 and 46:
MEHRABIAN (A.), 1976: Public places
Page 47 and 48:
MCGUIRE (W.J.), 1985: Attitudes and
Page 49 and 50:
752-72. PHILIPPOT (P.) & SCHAEFER (
Page 51 and 52:
4. ETHICAL ASPECTS (of visitor stud
Page 53 and 54:
5. INSTITUTIONAL/ORGANIZATIONAL ASP
Page 55 and 56:
in shopping malls. Env. & Beh. 38(4
Page 57 and 58:
6. HUMAN-WILDLIFE/ANIMAL RELATIONSH
Page 59 and 60:
STERBA (J.P.), 1995: From biocentri
Page 61 and 62:
PALMER (C.), 2001: Taming the wild
Page 63 and 64:
PASSARIELLO (P.), 1999: Me and my t
Page 65 and 66:
National Park, Indonesia. Env. Cons
Page 67 and 68:
eeuw. [Nature for people, people fo
Page 69 and 70:
practices and policies. Delft, Ebur
Page 71 and 72:
verschillende culturen. [Animal sto
Page 73 and 74:
WESTHOFF (V.), 1985: De verantwoord
Page 75 and 76:
conservation policies in society.]
Page 77 and 78:
BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: ATTIT
Page 79 and 80:
BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: WILDL
Page 81 and 82:
enlightenment. A cultural history o
Page 83 and 84:
Popular knowledge of nature, animal
Page 85 and 86:
Quarterly 46(2): 221-54. FIDLER (P.
Page 87 and 88:
MCKIBBEN (B.), 1990: The end of nat
Page 89 and 90:
Behav. 1(1): 5. http://historicalvo
Page 91 and 92:
SCHMITT (C.), 2007: Victorian beetl
Page 93 and 94:
IRWIN (R.), 2010: Camel. Animal ser
Page 95 and 96:
BIEDER (R.), 2005: Bear. Animal ser
Page 97 and 98:
inhabitants of the Russian federati
Page 99 and 100:
(J.) & REEVES (R.) (eds.): Marine M
Page 101 and 102:
Attitudes to Primates - visitor stu
Page 103 and 104:
Attitudes to Apes - visitor studies
Page 105 and 106:
BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: ATTIT
Page 107 and 108:
ZIEGAN (K.), 2005: Die Schlange in
Page 109 and 110:
7. LEISURE AND TOURISM STUDIES (Sel
Page 111 and 112:
BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: TOURI
Page 113 and 114:
9. INFORMAL EDUCATION AMERICAN INST
Page 115 and 116:
PACKER (J.) & BALLANTYNE (R.), 2004
Page 117 and 118:
Informal learning in zoos and aquar
Page 119 and 120:
LUCAS (A.), 1991: Info-attainment a
Page 121 and 122:
10. INTERPRETATION Interpretation
Page 123 and 124:
Rev. edn.. Corvallis, Oregon State
Page 125 and 126:
11. EXHIBIT EVALUATION Evaluation
Page 127 and 128:
Session, AAM Ann. Meeting. Washingt
Page 129 and 130:
MILES (R.), 1993: Grasping the grea
Page 131 and 132:
operating across the sectors to tac
Page 133 and 134:
KNOWLES (M.S.), HOLTON (E.F.) & SWA
Page 135 and 136:
BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: CHILD
Page 137 and 138:
o Children/youth and animals DVORAK
Page 139 and 140:
Summary. AAZPA 1986 Ann. Conf. Proc
Page 141 and 142:
CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY,
Page 143 and 144:
o Children/youth and zoos BIRNEY (B
Page 145 and 146:
MUMIN (A.I.), 2011: Invite, welcome
Page 147 and 148:
BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: FAMIL
Page 149 and 150:
Gender BITGOOD (S.) & BISHOP (S.),
Page 151 and 152:
Groups BRENNAN (T.), 1977: Elements
Page 153 and 154:
MOUSSOURI (T.), 2007: Implications
Page 155 and 156:
with the coalition of knowledge bui
Page 157 and 158:
80(2): 155-66. PARSONS (C.) & BREIS
Page 159 and 160:
BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: SCIEN
Page 161 and 162:
Senior citizens FRASER (J.), CLAYTO
Page 163 and 164:
BOGAN (M.) & KROMREY (J.), 1996: Me
Page 165 and 166:
nature and environmental education
Page 167 and 168:
problems: a qualitative study. Ecop
Page 169 and 170:
Education on climate change LUEBKE
Page 171 and 172:
psychological barriers. In : GRAJAL
Page 173 and 174:
48. www.physicstoday.org/resource/1
Page 175 and 176:
ainforests: Cologne Zoo exploring n
Page 177 and 178:
WOOLLARD (S.P.), 1999: Zoo educatio
Page 179 and 180:
Sustainability education SMITH (L.)
Page 181 and 182:
MORALES MIRANDA (J.), 1999: Interpr
Page 183 and 184:
EVERETT (M.) & BARRETT (M.S.), 2009
Page 185 and 186:
visitors. Challenges for the future
Page 187 and 188:
Natural history museums BITGOOD (S.
Page 189 and 190:
16. EXHIBIT DESIGN & EVALUATION: FR
Page 191 and 192:
http://historicalvoices.org/pbuilde
Page 193 and 194:
Specific exhibits BIRNEY (B.A.), 19
Page 195 and 196:
DE PRETER (W.), 2010: Luchthaven Za
Page 197 and 198:
BITGOOD (S.), 1992: Visitor orienta
Page 199 and 200:
Timing, visitor agendas DAVEY (G.),
Page 201 and 202:
Vol. One. Edinburgh, MuseumsEtc. :
Page 203 and 204:
18. TEXT, LABELS AND READABILITY RE
Page 205 and 206:
BRAMLEY (F.), 1992: Our mission is
Page 207 and 208:
Absense of labels LARSEN (J.), 2002
Page 209 and 210:
Graphics ON-GOING OR UNPUBLISHED ST
Page 211 and 212:
Antwerpen, 5 dec. 2008. BACKGROUND
Page 213 and 214:
Language and style BRAMLEY (F.), 19
Page 215 and 216:
Pre-formative evaluation of labels
Page 217 and 218:
Readability research in zoos and aq
Page 219 and 220:
SERRELL (B.), 1982b: Researching vi
Page 221 and 222:
19. INTERPRETIVE PUBLICATIONS (guid
Page 223 and 224:
20. INTERACTIVE EXHIBITS, SCIENCE C
Page 225 and 226:
& DIERKING (L.D.) (eds.): Public in
Page 227 and 228:
21. AUDIOVISUALS AND MULTIMEDIA Ge
Page 229 and 230:
CALLANAN (M.), JIPSON (J.) & SOENNI
Page 231 and 232:
HAMMOND (R.), 2012: It’s time to
Page 233 and 234:
BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: ELECT
Page 235 and 236:
Mobile phones : visitor studies O
Page 237 and 238:
Sound design in exhibits ON-GOING O
Page 239 and 240:
DEALY (H.), 1990: Zoo animal enrich
Page 241 and 242:
ON-GOING OR UNPUBLISHED STUDIES : B
Page 243 and 244:
at the zoo - education, fun or occu
Page 245 and 246:
24. ARTS IN ZOO/AQUARIUM EDUCATION
Page 247 and 248:
2007. HENSEL (K.), 1987: Discourse
Page 249 and 250:
KNAPP (D.) & YANG (L.), 2002: A phe
Page 251 and 252:
BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: NON-C
Page 253 and 254:
Prohibition signage: visitor studie
Page 255 and 256:
28. ETHICAL ASPECTS AND CRITICISM O
Page 257 and 258:
mens, dier en maatschappij. [Relati
Page 259 and 260:
Books. 242 pp. AUSTERMÜHLE (S.), 1
Page 261 and 262:
Ethical aspects: visitor studies -
Page 263 and 264:
29. GENERAL ZOO AND AQUARIUM INSTIT
Page 265 and 266:
Europe o General ANGELINI (S.), 200
Page 267 and 268:
o United Kingdom BALMFORD (A.), LEA
Page 269 and 270: North America ADELMAN (L.M.), FALK
Page 271 and 272: TURNER (W.R.), 1986: A view of the
Page 273 and 274: 30. HUMAN-ANIMAL INTERACTION IN ZOO
Page 275 and 276: Specific taxa o General NIMON (A.J.
Page 277 and 278: MITCHELL (G.), TROMBORG (C.T.), KAU
Page 279 and 280: 31. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION E
Page 281 and 282: MELLEN (J.), 2012: Psychology in zo
Page 283 and 284: http://home.planet.nl/~gkorthof/kor
Page 285 and 286: Biodiversity and conservation educa
Page 287 and 288: minding-animals-we-redecorate-natur
Page 289 and 290: Educ 22(1): 26-32 OGDEN (J.), ROUTM
Page 291 and 292: Behaviour change: visitor studies K
Page 293 and 294: Ex-situ conservation programs READI
Page 295 and 296: Zoo and aquarium conservation educa
Page 297 and 298: LIDINSKY (K.) & WILSON (L.), 2005:
Page 299 and 300: http://historicalvoices.org/pbuilde
Page 301 and 302: BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING : GUID
Page 303 and 304: value at the zoo.] Der Zool. Garten
Page 305 and 306: impact study: The National Aquarium
Page 307 and 308: Aquatic exhibits RIDGWAY (S.), LING
Page 309 and 310: Children’s zoos APEL (B.), 1977:
Page 311 and 312: Education centres WAGNER (K.F.) & M
Page 313 and 314: JONES (G.), 1989: Beyond landscape
Page 315 and 316: http://www.bgci.org/files/Worldwide
Page 317 and 318: & STEVENS (P.M.C.) (eds.): Conserva
Page 319: ROUTMAN (E..O.), 2000: Objective-ba
Page 323 and 324: LI (I.M.Y.), 2010: Education evalua
Page 325 and 326: Reptile exhibits BARRY (S.), 1984:
Page 327 and 328: BACKGROUND & FURTHER READING: THEMA
Page 329 and 330: BLAKELY (R.L.), 1981: Formulating a
Page 331 and 332: KAWATA (K.), 2012: Exorcising of a
Page 333 and 334: http://www.einseitig.info/html/cont
Page 335 and 336: PECHLANER (H.), 1987: “Themenzoo
Page 337 and 338: BROWN (T.), 2007: Hagenbeck’s cen
Page 339 and 340: MASON (P.), 1999: Zoos as heritage
Page 341 and 342: OSBORNE (M.A.), 1994: Nature, the e
Page 343 and 344: BARBER (L.), 1980: The heyday of na
Page 345 and 346: PHILLIPS (C.), 1964: The captive se
Page 347 and 348: KISER (L.), 2007: Animals in mediev
Page 349 and 350: Institutional exhibit philosophies
Page 351 and 352: WESSELY (C.), 2007: Lesarten des Na
Page 353 and 354: BERTRAM (B.), 2004: Misconceptions
Page 355 and 356: JOY (J.), 1997 : BioParks : today a
Page 357: WINEMAN (J.), PIPER (C.) & MAPLE (T
show all

Visitor studies bibliography - European Association of Zoos and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?