28.01.2014 Views

Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com

Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com

Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Depression was history, rather than a current worry. One<br />

might add other risks: rioting over debt and taxes as seen in<br />

Greece, or natural disasters that clobber the economy such<br />

as the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan. If the<br />

premiums were reasonable, many of us would consider<br />

insuring our net worth. The rising interest in tail-risk hedging<br />

suggests a bull market in such insurance.<br />

But the truth is, in one sense, we are all being paid that<br />

premium to accept many of the unknown, and unquantifiable,<br />

risks. There is a long-debated puzzle about the<br />

equity risk premium (ERP)—the extra return one expects<br />

from holding a risky stock instead of a Treasury bill—why<br />

does it seem as large as 3 to 5 percent or more? Research<br />

by Robert Barro 4 argues that the ERP is <strong>com</strong>pensation<br />

for accepting a small risk of a truly catastrophic event.<br />

An example might be a war that would close markets for<br />

several years and devastate an economy. Barro estimates<br />

the probability of such catastrophic events and then links<br />

this to an individual’s utility function to show that the<br />

degree of risk aversion is reasonable. Through the market,<br />

the ERP is <strong>com</strong>pensating investors for risks they are facing<br />

through their investors. The ERP means that each investor<br />

writes a put option on his entire investment holdings and<br />

then sells it to himself. He accepts the risks and receives<br />

the premiums. The market sets the premium. Writing and<br />

buying this put is mandatory if an investor participates<br />

in the market. Those other options—from the Dutch East<br />

India Company to an option on the S&P 500 Index—are<br />

voluntary, not mandatory.<br />

A major benefit of options embracing quant models<br />

is that the range of options and quantitative tools has<br />

expanded greatly since Black-Scholes. Two examples<br />

familiar to index investors are options on indexes led<br />

by the S&P 500 and VIX. A put on the S&P 500 is not the<br />

same as a put option on one’s entire net worth, but it is<br />

a lot more <strong>com</strong>prehensive than a put on a single stock.<br />

VIX <strong>com</strong>es full circle in offering new ways to use options<br />

to protect, or invest, in the market while returning information<br />

to the market from options priced in the market.<br />

Much remains that can be done with options to give<br />

people ways to insure or accept risks. Ten years ago, we all<br />

thought that real estate prices rarely drop. Now the idea of<br />

insuring the economic value of one’s home looks attractive.<br />

One idea is to use the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price<br />

indexes puts for homeowners or calls for investors on<br />

home values. If one can insure against fire, it only makes<br />

sense to insure against a market collapse.<br />

What does this all have to do with Amsterdam and<br />

Black-Scholes? Only this: Derivatives are thought of by<br />

some as weapons of financial mass destruction, a “new<br />

new thing” that contributed to the financial crisis and that<br />

are dangerous in the hands of unknowing investors.<br />

But from another perspective, options—and optionslinked<br />

products like the VIX—have been with us for<br />

centuries, and used properly, have the opposite effect.<br />

Like the old traders who used options on the Dutch East<br />

India Company because they couldn’t handle the risk of<br />

owning the stock, they are a way of limiting our downside,<br />

insuring against shipwrecks and protecting our<br />

portfolios from harm.<br />

Endnotes<br />

1 Black, Fischer and Myron Scholes, “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” 81(3) Journal of Political Economy, 1973, pp. 637-654.<br />

2 Geoffrey Poitras, “The Early History of Option Contracts,” Simon Fraser University, September 2008.<br />

3 William N. Goetzmann and K. Geert Rouwenhorst, “The Origins of Value,” Oxford University Press, September 2008.<br />

4 Robert Barro, “Rare Events and the Equity Risk Premium,” Harvard University, July 2005.<br />

Why subscribe to the<br />

The Journal of Indexes is the premier source for financial index research, news and<br />

data. Written by and for industry experts and financial practitioners, it is the book of<br />

record for the index industry. Browse content online at www.indexuniverse.<strong>com</strong>/JOI<br />

TO SUBSCRIBE, VISIT:<br />

www.indexuniverse.<strong>com</strong>/JOI/subscriptions<br />

Redefining Credit Risk<br />

William Mast<br />

Credit Derivatives Indexes<br />

Gavan Nolan and Tobias Sproehnle<br />

A Fixed-In<strong>com</strong>e Roundtable<br />

Ken Volpert, Jason Hsu, Waqas Samad, Larry Swedroe and more<br />

The Impact of Bond Fund Flows<br />

David Blanchett<br />

Plus David Blitzer on bubbles, Jeremy Schwartz on dividends and buybacks, Francis Gupta on country<br />

classifications and a biography on Bogle<br />

www.journalofindexes.<strong>com</strong> November / December 2012 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!