28.01.2014 Views

Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com

Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com

Download complete issue - IndexUniverse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

News<br />

tially providing both a “value and<br />

growth tilt through intrinsic value<br />

and economic weighting.”<br />

Facebook Joins<br />

Nasdaq’s Q-50 Index<br />

Facebook officially became one<br />

of the 50 securities included in the<br />

Nasdaq Q-50 Index on Sept. 24.<br />

Many had hoped that after the<br />

Nasdaq OMX Group changed its<br />

“seasoning rules” in April for three<br />

of its most popular indexes—including<br />

the Nasdaq 100 Index—Facebook<br />

would be entering Nasdaq’s flagship<br />

index by September. Instead, after<br />

bleeding more than half of its value in<br />

its first four months as a public <strong>com</strong>pany,<br />

Facebook has been added to<br />

the Nasdaq Q-50 Index—the feeder<br />

index for the Nasdaq 100, according<br />

to a press release from Nasdaq.<br />

The benchmark, which is designed<br />

to track the performance of the 50<br />

stocks that would be next in line for<br />

inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 Index,<br />

appears to have no ETFs attached to it.<br />

Aside from Facebook, other<br />

names being added to the Nasdaq<br />

Q-50 on Sept. 24 include Groupon,<br />

Concur Technologies, Mellanox<br />

Technologies, NXP Semiconductors,<br />

ONYX Pharmaceuticals, Royal Gold,<br />

TW tele<strong>com</strong> and Western Digital Corp.<br />

Nasdaq noted that Facebook<br />

can also be found in the Nasdaq<br />

Composite Index, which underlies<br />

the Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index<br />

Tracking ETF (Nasdaq GM: ONEQ),<br />

as well as in the Nasdaq Computer<br />

Index, the Nasdaq Global Select<br />

Market Composite and the Nasdaq<br />

Global Select Computer Index.<br />

AROUND THE WORLD OF ETFs<br />

Schwab Cuts Costs<br />

On All 15 ETFs<br />

Charles Schwab took the battle<br />

in fees to its arch rival Vanguard by<br />

cutting prices on all 15 of its ETFs by<br />

25 to 60 percent, resulting in each of<br />

the ETFs be<strong>com</strong>ing cheapest in their<br />

respective Lipper categories.<br />

As an example, the Schwab U.S.<br />

Broad Market (NYSE Arca: SCHB) will<br />

now cost 0.04 percent, <strong>com</strong>pared with its<br />

previous expense ratio of 0.06 percent.<br />

Company officials said the<br />

moves, which became effective<br />

Sept. 20, brought the weighted average<br />

overall expense ratio of its ETFs<br />

down to 0.077 percent.<br />

Some analysts speculate that<br />

Schwab’s bigger plan is to attract<br />

more clients and financial advisors<br />

to its overall platform, and once they<br />

have arrived, hope they make use of<br />

Schwab products and services that<br />

are more expensive than its low-cost<br />

ETFs, which can also be traded <strong>com</strong>mission-free<br />

by Schwab clients.<br />

The move definitely raises the<br />

bar on Vanguard, whose reputation<br />

rests largely on its low-cost<br />

funds. What Vanguard chooses to<br />

do remains to be seen, but it’s clear<br />

that Schwab’s low-cost strategy is<br />

working every bit as well as it is for<br />

Vanguard. Schwab, which launched<br />

its first ETFs in November 2009, had<br />

$6.33 billion in 15 separate ETFs as<br />

of Sept. 20, 2012, according to data<br />

<strong>com</strong>piled by <strong>IndexUniverse</strong>.<br />

iShares Debuts Frontier<br />

Markets ETF<br />

In mid-September, iShares rolled<br />

out the iShares MSCI Frontier 100<br />

Index Fund (NYSE Arca: FM), a<br />

fund that serves up focused exposure<br />

to the least mature and least<br />

liquid economies globally.<br />

FM tracks an MSCI benchmark that<br />

taps into equities from 20 frontier markets,<br />

including Argentina, Bangladesh,<br />

Croatia, Estonia, Jordan, Kazakhstan,<br />

Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, Mauritius,<br />

Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar,<br />

Romania, Serbia, Sri Lanka, Ukraine,<br />

the United Arab Emirates and Vietnam.<br />

The portfolio is heavily allocated<br />

to energy, financial and tele<strong>com</strong>munication<br />

names, and <strong>com</strong>es with an<br />

annual expense ratio of 0.79 percent.<br />

iShares is the first ETF sponsor<br />

to create a broad frontier markets<br />

fund since Guggenheim predecessor<br />

Claymore launched the first-to-market<br />

Frontier Markets ETF (NYSE Arca:<br />

FRN) in 2008. But the new iShares also<br />

looks to be the first pure-play frontier<br />

fund, as the $142 million Guggenheim<br />

fund has heavy allocations to countries<br />

that some index providers consider<br />

emerging rather than frontier.<br />

Vanguard Plots Rival<br />

To STPZ, STIP<br />

Vanguard filed regulatory paperwork<br />

in late July to market a short-term<br />

inflation-protected securities index<br />

fund that would include an ETF share<br />

class that would <strong>com</strong>pete with similar<br />

products from Pimco and iShares.<br />

The prospectus detailed plans for<br />

the Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-<br />

Protected Securities Index Fund that<br />

would track the Barclays U.S. Treasury<br />

Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS)<br />

0-5 Year Index, and invest in inflation-protected<br />

U.S. Treasury securities<br />

that have a remaining maturity of<br />

less than five years.<br />

The fund would serve up four share<br />

classes, including an ETF share class<br />

that would cost 0.10 percent in fees, or<br />

half the price tag of <strong>com</strong>peting funds.<br />

The iShares Barclays 0-5 Year<br />

TIPS Bond Fund (NYSE Arca: STIP)<br />

and Pimco 1-5 Year U.S. TIPS Index<br />

Fund (NYSE Arca: STPZ) both cost<br />

0.20 percent a year, and have assets<br />

of $358 million and nearly $1 billion,<br />

respectively.<br />

UBS Closes All VIX ETNs<br />

Except XVIX<br />

UBS redeemed all but one of its<br />

VIX-related ETNs, as the securities<br />

were not getting the traction the firm<br />

had hoped—in part because of the<br />

presence of a number of VIX-related<br />

ETFs that are now on the market. The<br />

largest of the funds at the time of the<br />

announcement was just under $20<br />

million in assets, with most of the rest<br />

<strong>com</strong>ing in under $15 million.<br />

The 12 closed ETNs included six long<br />

and short pairs that offered exposure<br />

to different portions of the VIX futures<br />

curve. The call settlement date was Sept.<br />

12, with the call settlement amount set<br />

at the current principal of amount of the<br />

securities as of Sept. 7.<br />

Significantly, UBS decided to leave<br />

56 November / December 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!