05.03.2014 Views

Supporting Document - Attachment 2 - Summary Dashboards - IPART

Supporting Document - Attachment 2 - Summary Dashboards - IPART

Supporting Document - Attachment 2 - Summary Dashboards - IPART

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ATTACHMENT 2<br />

- NATURAL AREA VISITOR FACILITIES — ASSET OVERVIEW<br />

CONDITION OF SIGNAGE ASSETS<br />

Business As Usual<br />

10 Year Projected<br />

Comments<br />

Signage is essential to maximise visitor safety and the value of the experience achieved when visiting sites of natural and cultural<br />

heritage. Trackhead and orientation signage along most tracks is inadequate to meet recently introduced Australian Standards.<br />

Interpretive signage for the majority of the important sites is minimal and does not provide the maximum experiential contribution.<br />

Current<br />

51% <br />

GOOD/FAIR CONDITION<br />

35% in 10 yrs. with available funding<br />

Current 70% in 10 yrs. with additional SV funding<br />

49% <br />

POOR CONDITION<br />

65% in 10 yrs. with available funding<br />

Current 30% in 10 yrs. with additional SV funding<br />

Financial Strategies Implemented<br />

10 Year Projected<br />

Risks<br />

Low visitor satisfaction may result from inadequate signage<br />

or the absence of interpretive signage at high profile<br />

sites.<br />

User wellbeing may be jeopardised due to inadequate<br />

orientation signage.<br />

Response<br />

.Prioritise funding allocated for signage towards sites or<br />

tracks with high visitation or value to the community.<br />

Signage provided at trackheads identifying limited or no<br />

orientation signage along the route.<br />

Confidence in Data:<br />

HIGH<br />

MODERATE<br />

LOW<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!