Supporting Document - Attachment 2 - Summary Dashboards - IPART
Supporting Document - Attachment 2 - Summary Dashboards - IPART
Supporting Document - Attachment 2 - Summary Dashboards - IPART
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ATTACHMENT 2<br />
- NATURAL AREA VISITOR FACILITIES — ASSET OVERVIEW<br />
CONDITION OF SIGNAGE ASSETS<br />
Business As Usual<br />
10 Year Projected<br />
Comments<br />
Signage is essential to maximise visitor safety and the value of the experience achieved when visiting sites of natural and cultural<br />
heritage. Trackhead and orientation signage along most tracks is inadequate to meet recently introduced Australian Standards.<br />
Interpretive signage for the majority of the important sites is minimal and does not provide the maximum experiential contribution.<br />
Current<br />
51% <br />
GOOD/FAIR CONDITION<br />
35% in 10 yrs. with available funding<br />
Current 70% in 10 yrs. with additional SV funding<br />
49% <br />
POOR CONDITION<br />
65% in 10 yrs. with available funding<br />
Current 30% in 10 yrs. with additional SV funding<br />
Financial Strategies Implemented<br />
10 Year Projected<br />
Risks<br />
Low visitor satisfaction may result from inadequate signage<br />
or the absence of interpretive signage at high profile<br />
sites.<br />
User wellbeing may be jeopardised due to inadequate<br />
orientation signage.<br />
Response<br />
.Prioritise funding allocated for signage towards sites or<br />
tracks with high visitation or value to the community.<br />
Signage provided at trackheads identifying limited or no<br />
orientation signage along the route.<br />
Confidence in Data:<br />
HIGH<br />
MODERATE<br />
LOW<br />
72