Juvenile Justice System and Risk Factor Data - Illinois Criminal ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

creating an automatic notification system to confirm court appearances. Alternatives to detention were also created, such as evening reporting centers, where 92 percent of youth placed in centers remained arrest free during their placement. Finally, Cook County was able to improve conditions of confinement by decreasing the number of youth detained, thereby easing overcrowding in their detention center. Changes to mental health care, staff training, and the facility itself that improved conditions of confinement were also implemented. Building on the success of the Cook County initiative, the Illinois Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) was formed to promote the objectives of JDAI throughout Illinois. JDAI is coordinated by several state and local agencies and entities, including the Annie E. Casey Foundation, Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission, Illinois Department of Human Services, Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts, Cook County Juvenile Probation and Court Services Department, and the Authority. Detention alternative initiatives currently exist in DuPage, Lake, Madison, Peoria, St. Clair, and Winnebago counties. The JDAI initiative also operates in the Second Judicial Circuit (serving Crawford, Edwards, Franklin, Gallatin, Hamilton, Hardin, Jefferson, Lawrence, Richland, Wabash, Wayne, and White counties), the Fourth Judicial Circuit (serving Christian, Clay, Clinton, Effingham, Fayette, Jasper, Marion, Montgomery, and Shelby counties), the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit (serving LaSalle, Grundy, and Bureau counties), and the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit (serving Carroll, JoDaviess, Lee, Ogle, and Stephenson counties). Efforts are ongoing to evaluate the effectiveness of the initiative. Disproportionate minority contact Between FY03 and FY05, the Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission funded efforts to reduce disproportionate minority contact in Peoria County, St. Clair County, Cook County’s south suburbs, and Chicago’s Lawndale community. Each site hired a local coordinator to collaborate with the W. Haywood Burns Institute, a leading national organization working to reduce the over-representation of minority youth in the juvenile justice system. The Burns Institute model requires the active commitment and participation of key traditional and non-traditional stakeholders in the juvenile justice system in each site—including judges, prosecutors, public defenders, police, probation, political leaders, service providers, and community groups. The institute leads stakeholders through a data-driven, consensus-based process that focuses specifically on changing policies, procedures, and practices to reduce racial disparities in the juvenile justice system. In FY06, the initiative expanded to include sites in Macon County, the Englewood community area of Chicago, and Sauk Village. The Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission funds a statewide DMC coordinator position to oversee Illinois DMC efforts. 92
Models for Change Models for Change, an initiative of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, is based on research regarding adolescent development and delinquent behavior for significant changes in law, policy and practice. Models for Change partners with the Illinois, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, and Washington to advance juvenile reforms that effectively hold young people accountable for their actions, provide for their rehabilitation, protect them from harm, increase their life chances, and manage the risk they pose to themselves and the public. Models for Change supports the reform efforts under way in Illinois to bring about change in three areas needing improvement: the age of juvenile court jurisdiction, community-based alternatives to secure confinement, and disproportionate minority contact with the juvenile justice system. The MacArthur Foundation, in partnership with its grantees in the juvenile justice field, developed a model juvenile justice system that responds to delinquency locally and informally whenever possible. Under this vision, all but a limited number of juvenile offenders are to be supervised, sanctioned, and treated in community settings. Illinois Balanced and Restorative Justice Initiative The principles of balanced and restorative justice were adopted as the guiding philosophy for the Illinois juvenile justice system by the Juvenile Justice Reform Provisions of 1998. In 2002, the collaborative Illinois Balanced and Restorative Justice Initiative (IBARJI) was formed to provide leadership, education, and support to the courts, governmental agencies, organizations, communities and individuals as they strive to promote the values and principles of BARJ in their communities. The Initiative created the non-profit, Illinois BARJ Project (IBARJP), to raise and use funds to further BARJ in Illinois. Since 2005, IBARJI has sponsored regional and local trainings across the state on BARJ topics, as well as a statewide training in 2007. Safety Net Works Safety Net Works is a 2008 grant program from the Governor’s Office designed to reduce youth violence and victimization in Illinois (ages 10 to 24). The initiative brings together state and community resources to develop strategies intended to make targeted communities safer places for youth. Safety Net Works goals include: • Engaging communities in comprehensive, coordinated youth violence prevention activities through a coalition approach. • Addressing a wide range of individual, family, and community factors that keep young people from reaching their full potential and by providing services, interventions, and supports that will build healthy environments. • Promoting youth engagement and leadership in all aspects of the initiative. The Chicago communities selected to participate include Auburn-Gresham, Austin, Brighton Park, East Garfield Park, Englewood, Gage Park/Chicago Lawn, Grand Boulevard, Humboldt 93
Page 1:
State of Illinois Pat Quinn, Govern
Page 4 and 5:
Acknowledgments We wish to acknowle
Page 6 and 7:
State initiatives .................
Page 8 and 9:
Table 18: Number and percentage of
Page 10 and 11:
Figure 16: Rate of youth adjudicate
Page 13 and 14:
Foreword The Illinois Criminal Just
Page 15 and 16:
Poverty In calendar year 2007, 524,
Page 17 and 18:
Illinois juvenile justice system da
Page 19 and 20:
Special issues Disproportionate min
Page 21 and 22:
Youth courts Youth courts, also cal
Page 23 and 24:
Introduction Since 2003, the Illino
Page 25 and 26:
The Juvenile Justice System and Ris
Page 27 and 28:
Figure 1 Flowchart of the Illinois
Page 29 and 30:
Table 1 Legislative changes from th
Page 31 and 32:
• Competency development. Restora
Page 33 and 34:
Community risk factors Community ri
Page 35 and 36:
Education In 2000, the most recent
Page 37 and 38:
Social context The data elements ex
Page 39 and 40:
neglect. That year, 28,516 cases of
Page 41 and 42:
Correctional inmates with children
Page 43 and 44:
Chronic truants are students who ha
Page 45 and 46:
Expulsions During AY07, 3,451 stude
Page 47 and 48:
important protective factors agains
Page 49 and 50:
An alternate source for youth arres
Page 51 and 52:
Arrest data by offense category is
Page 53 and 54:
Court data After being arrested a y
Page 55 and 56:
Map 2 P ercent change in rate of ne
Page 57 and 58:
Map 3 Percent change in rate of you
Page 59 and 60:
Detention data information Data col
Page 61 and 62:
The Central region of Illinois expe
Page 63 and 64: Transfers to criminal court Youth 1
Page 65 and 66: Map 5 Number of detained youth tran
Page 67 and 68: The rate of formal probation cases
Page 69 and 70: Informal probation caseloads The nu
Page 71 and 72: Delinquency petitions continued und
Page 73 and 74: Map 8 Percent change in rate of you
Page 75 and 76: adult would. Mandatory supervised r
Page 77 and 78: Map 9 Percent change in rate of you
Page 79 and 80: Of court commitments in FY07, 28 pe
Page 81 and 82: 2004, increasing 28 percent from 1,
Page 83 and 84: Special issues Disproportionate min
Page 85 and 86: Calculate the jurisdictional RI usi
Page 87 and 88: under-represented at 52 percent les
Page 89 and 90: Table 10 RRI calculations for black
Page 91 and 92: Detention In 2007, the rates of adm
Page 93 and 94: Map 12 Hispanic youth detention rel
Page 95 and 96: Map 13 Black youth IDJJ relative ra
Page 97 and 98: Table 14 provides a statewide overv
Page 99 and 100: From 1997 to 2007, there was a 65 p
Page 101 and 102: Table 17 shows the number of youth
Page 103 and 104: Females in secure detention Females
Page 105 and 106: screening after referral from a juv
Page 107 and 108: Specialized courts Juvenile drug co
Page 109 and 110: Youth courts Youth courts, also cal
Page 111 and 112: Record expungement In Illinois, aft
Page 113: The Second Judicial Circuit Redeplo
Page 117 and 118: Map 16 Juvenile justice system init
Page 119 and 120: is not known how accurate the data
Page 121 and 122: Further recommendations The recomme
Page 123 and 124: Automatic transfer (Excluded Jurisd
Page 125 and 126: Detoxification Discretionary transf
Page 127 and 128: Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA)
Page 129 and 130: Property crime index A subcategory
Page 131 and 132: Appendix B: Map of judicial circuit
Page 133 and 134: Appendix D: Map of Illinois youth c
Page 135 and 136: 12 - Homicide, Aggravated Kidnappin
Page 137 and 138: Offense Offense Offense Offense Cat
Page 139 and 140: Illinois Department of Corrections
Page 141: Prevention First 2800 Montvale Driv
Page 144 and 145: Table 8: Number of reported cases o
Page 146 and 147: Table 1: Number of services to yout
Page 148 and 149: Table 2: Number of services to yout
Page 150 and 151: Table 3: Number of unemployed, FY02
Page 152 and 153: Table 4: Estimated median household
Page 154 and 155: Table 5: Estimated number of youth
Page 156 and 157: Table 6: Monthly average number of
Page 158 and 159: Table 7: Number of reported domesti
Page 160 and 161: Table 8: Number of reported cases o
Page 162 and 163: Table 9: Number of indicated cases
Page 164 and 165:
Table 10: Number of reported cases
Page 166 and 167:
Table 11: Number of indicated cases
Page 168 and 169:
Table 12: Number of reported crimes
Page 170 and 171:
Table 13: Number of inmates admitte
Page 172 and 173:
Table 14: Number of students report
Page 174 and 175:
Table 15: Number and sex of truant,
Page 176 and 177:
Table 16: Number of students suspen
Page 178 and 179:
Table 17: Number of students expell
Page 180 and 181:
Table 18: Number of high school dro
Page 182 and 183:
Table 19: Youth population age 10-1
Page 184 and 185:
Table 20: Youth population by race
Page 186 and 187:
Table 21: Number of youth arrests b
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Table 25: Number and type of court
Page 196 and 197:
Table 26: Number and type of youth
Page 198 and 199:
Table 27: Number of delinquency pet
Page 200 and 201:
Table 28: Number of youth (ages 10
Page 202 and 203:
Table 29: Number of youth admission
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Table 33: Average daily population
Page 212 and 213:
Table 34: Number of youth transfers
Page 214 and 215:
Table 35: Number of active youth fo
Page 216 and 217:
Table 36: Number of active informal
Page 218 and 219:
Table 37: Number of youth delinquen
Page 220 and 221:
Table 38: Number of youth probation
Page 222 and 223:
Table 39: Number and type of court
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Table 43: Number of youth (age 13 t
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Table 46: Number of youth released
Page 238 and 239:
Table 47: Representation index (RI)
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Notes 1 Griffin, Patrick, Linda Szy
Page 246:
41 Shelden, Randall G., Detention D
show all

Juvenile Justice System and Risk Factor Data - Illinois Criminal ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?