Juvenile Justice System and Risk Factor Data - Illinois Criminal ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Map 1 Percent change in rate of youth arrested in Illinois, 2002 – 2007 JO DAVIESS WINNEBAGO MCHENRY STEPHENSON BOONE LAKE CARROLL WHITESIDE OGLE LEE KANE DEKALB DUPAGE COOK KENDALL ROCK ISLAND BUREAU HENRY LASALLE GRUNDY WILL MERCER PUTNAM KANKAKEE HENDERSON WARREN KNOX PEORIA WOODFORD LIVINGSTON IROQUOIS MCDONOUGH FULTON HANCOCK STARK MARSHALL POPE TAZEWELL MCLEAN FORD Legend MASON VERMILION SCHUYLER DEWITT LOGAN CHAMPAIGN MENARD ADAMS PIATT BROWN CASS MACON SANGAMON DOUGLAS MORGAN EDGAR PIKE SCOTT MOULTRIE CHRISTIAN COLES > 100% increase 51% - 100% increase GREENE SHELBY CLARK MACOUPIN CUMBERLAND CALHOUN MONTGOMERY JERSEY EFFINGHAM FAYETTE JASPER CRAWFORD BOND MADISON CLAY RICHLAND LAWRENCE CLINTON MARION MONROE ST. CLAIR RANDOLPH WASHINGTON JEFFERSON PERRY HAMILTON FRANKLIN WAYNE WABASH EDWARDS WHITE JACKSON SALINE GALLATIN WILLIAMSON 1% - 50% increase 1% - 50% decrease > 50% decrease Fewer than 10 arrests reported in one or both years JOHNSON UNION PULASKI ALEXANDER MASSAC HARDIN Source: Authority’s CHRI Ad Hoc datasets 30
Court data After being arrested a youth may be referred to the county state’s attorney for prosecution. A petition is filed when a decision is made to prosecute. The number of petitions filed in each county can be found in the data tables section in Appendix H. The court may request investigations that may inform the judge and court staff of a youth’s background and prior history. The number of juvenile/social investigation reports conducted by a county’s probation department is also included in the data tables section in Appendix H. The most common type of petition filed is a delinquency petition. Delinquency petitions are filed when a youth is alleged to be delinquent; that is, the youth allegedly violated or attempted to violate a state or federal statute, or a municipal or county ordinance. Once a delinquency petition is filed, a number of possible scenarios may follow. New information may come to light that results in the state’s attorney dismissing the petition against the youth, entering into a plea agreement, or referring the youth to a diversionary program. If none of these scenarios occur, an adjudicatory hearing, or trial, is held to determine whether the allegations against the youth are supported by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. If the youth is adjudicated delinquent, a dispositional hearing or sentencing hearing is held. After the Juvenile Justice Reform Provisions of 1998 were enacted, the terms “adjudicatory hearing” and “dispositional hearing” were changed to “trial” and “sentencing hearing,” respectively, to reflect the terms used in criminal court. Court activity information is collected by the Administrative Office of Illinois Courts (AOIC). These data are collected aggregately by county from each circuit court and presented in their annual reports. No information is made available by AOIC about the youth included in the data such as gender, race or ethnicity, age, or type of offense. While it is not possible to determine the ages of youth included in AOIC juvenile court data, it is assumed that they are between the ages of 10 and 16, as these are the ages youth are under the juvenile court jurisdiction (until January 1, 2010, when youth 17 years of age charged with misdemeanor offenses will remain under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court). For this reason, all rates are calculated using the juvenile population ages 10 to 16. It is possible, for youth under age 10 and over age 16 to be under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. Data summary Delinquency petitions There was a steady decrease in the number of delinquency petitions filed statewide over the period studied. From 1997 to 2007, the number of new delinquency petitions filed in Illinois decreased by 29 percent. This decline was affected in part by a 48 percent decline in new delinquency petitions filed in Cook County between 1997 and 2007. The decline in Cook County petitions is possibly due to expansions in juvenile diversion programming. Figure 15 depicts the rate of new delinquency petitions filed by region from 1997 to 2007. 31
Page 1: State of Illinois Pat Quinn, Govern
Page 4 and 5: Acknowledgments We wish to acknowle
Page 6 and 7: State initiatives .................
Page 8 and 9: Table 18: Number and percentage of
Page 10 and 11: Figure 16: Rate of youth adjudicate
Page 13 and 14: Foreword The Illinois Criminal Just
Page 15 and 16: Poverty In calendar year 2007, 524,
Page 17 and 18: Illinois juvenile justice system da
Page 19 and 20: Special issues Disproportionate min
Page 21 and 22: Youth courts Youth courts, also cal
Page 23 and 24: Introduction Since 2003, the Illino
Page 25 and 26: The Juvenile Justice System and Ris
Page 27 and 28: Figure 1 Flowchart of the Illinois
Page 29 and 30: Table 1 Legislative changes from th
Page 31 and 32: • Competency development. Restora
Page 33 and 34: Community risk factors Community ri
Page 35 and 36: Education In 2000, the most recent
Page 37 and 38: Social context The data elements ex
Page 39 and 40: neglect. That year, 28,516 cases of
Page 41 and 42: Correctional inmates with children
Page 43 and 44: Chronic truants are students who ha
Page 45 and 46: Expulsions During AY07, 3,451 stude
Page 47 and 48: important protective factors agains
Page 49 and 50: An alternate source for youth arres
Page 51: Arrest data by offense category is
Page 55 and 56: Map 2 P ercent change in rate of ne
Page 57 and 58: Map 3 Percent change in rate of you
Page 59 and 60: Detention data information Data col
Page 61 and 62: The Central region of Illinois expe
Page 63 and 64: Transfers to criminal court Youth 1
Page 65 and 66: Map 5 Number of detained youth tran
Page 67 and 68: The rate of formal probation cases
Page 69 and 70: Informal probation caseloads The nu
Page 71 and 72: Delinquency petitions continued und
Page 75 and 76: adult would. Mandatory supervised r
Page 79 and 80: Of court commitments in FY07, 28 pe
Page 81 and 82: 2004, increasing 28 percent from 1,
Page 83 and 84: Special issues Disproportionate min
Page 85 and 86: Calculate the jurisdictional RI usi
Page 87 and 88: under-represented at 52 percent les
Page 89 and 90: Table 10 RRI calculations for black
Page 91 and 92: Detention In 2007, the rates of adm
Page 93 and 94: Map 12 Hispanic youth detention rel
Page 95 and 96: Map 13 Black youth IDJJ relative ra
Page 97 and 98: Table 14 provides a statewide overv
Page 99 and 100: From 1997 to 2007, there was a 65 p
Page 101 and 102: Table 17 shows the number of youth
Page 103 and 104:
Females in secure detention Females
Page 105 and 106:
screening after referral from a juv
Page 107 and 108:
Specialized courts Juvenile drug co
Page 109 and 110:
Youth courts Youth courts, also cal
Page 111 and 112:
Record expungement In Illinois, aft
Page 113 and 114:
The Second Judicial Circuit Redeplo
Page 115 and 116:
Models for Change Models for Change
Page 117 and 118:
Map 16 Juvenile justice system init
Page 119 and 120:
is not known how accurate the data
Page 121 and 122:
Further recommendations The recomme
Page 123 and 124:
Automatic transfer (Excluded Jurisd
Page 125 and 126:
Detoxification Discretionary transf
Page 127 and 128:
Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA)
Page 129 and 130:
Property crime index A subcategory
Page 131 and 132:
Appendix B: Map of judicial circuit
Page 133 and 134:
Appendix D: Map of Illinois youth c
Page 135 and 136:
12 - Homicide, Aggravated Kidnappin
Page 137 and 138:
Offense Offense Offense Offense Cat
Page 139 and 140:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Page 141:
Prevention First 2800 Montvale Driv
Page 144 and 145:
Table 8: Number of reported cases o
Page 146 and 147:
Table 1: Number of services to yout
Page 148 and 149:
Table 2: Number of services to yout
Page 150 and 151:
Table 3: Number of unemployed, FY02
Page 152 and 153:
Table 4: Estimated median household
Page 154 and 155:
Table 5: Estimated number of youth
Page 156 and 157:
Table 6: Monthly average number of
Page 158 and 159:
Table 7: Number of reported domesti
Page 160 and 161:
Table 8: Number of reported cases o
Page 162 and 163:
Table 9: Number of indicated cases
Page 164 and 165:
Table 10: Number of reported cases
Page 166 and 167:
Table 11: Number of indicated cases
Page 168 and 169:
Table 12: Number of reported crimes
Page 170 and 171:
Table 13: Number of inmates admitte
Page 172 and 173:
Table 14: Number of students report
Page 174 and 175:
Table 15: Number and sex of truant,
Page 176 and 177:
Table 16: Number of students suspen
Page 178 and 179:
Table 17: Number of students expell
Page 180 and 181:
Table 18: Number of high school dro
Page 182 and 183:
Table 19: Youth population age 10-1
Page 184 and 185:
Table 20: Youth population by race
Page 186 and 187:
Table 21: Number of youth arrests b
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Table 25: Number and type of court
Page 196 and 197:
Table 26: Number and type of youth
Page 198 and 199:
Table 27: Number of delinquency pet
Page 200 and 201:
Table 28: Number of youth (ages 10
Page 202 and 203:
Table 29: Number of youth admission
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Table 33: Average daily population
Page 212 and 213:
Table 34: Number of youth transfers
Page 214 and 215:
Table 35: Number of active youth fo
Page 216 and 217:
Table 36: Number of active informal
Page 218 and 219:
Table 37: Number of youth delinquen
Page 220 and 221:
Table 38: Number of youth probation
Page 222 and 223:
Table 39: Number and type of court
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Table 43: Number of youth (age 13 t
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Table 46: Number of youth released
Page 238 and 239:
Table 47: Representation index (RI)
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Notes 1 Griffin, Patrick, Linda Szy
Page 246:
41 Shelden, Randall G., Detention D
show all

Juvenile Justice System and Risk Factor Data - Illinois Criminal ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?