15.03.2014 Views

Juvenile Justice System and Risk Factor Data - Illinois Criminal ...

Juvenile Justice System and Risk Factor Data - Illinois Criminal ...

Juvenile Justice System and Risk Factor Data - Illinois Criminal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Arrest data by offense category is determined by a hierarchical method. In a single arrest<br />

incident, a youth may be charged with multiple offenses. In the past, the most serious offense<br />

could not always be determined easily. The Authority developed a hierarchy to determine the<br />

most serious offense charge during an arrest by using the statute <strong>and</strong> offense class applied<br />

systematically across years. Offense categories—property, person, drug, sex offenses, status,<br />

weapons, <strong>and</strong> other offenses—were created based on the <strong>Illinois</strong> Compiled Statutes.<br />

In 2007, arrests in which the most serious offense for which the youth was charged was a<br />

property crime accounted for approximately one-third of all youth arrests. Arrests for offenses<br />

against a person, including homicide, accounted for 28 percent of all youth arrests <strong>and</strong> arrests for<br />

a drug offense accounted for 13 percent of all youth arrests. Arrests for status offenses accounted<br />

for 3 percent of arrests <strong>and</strong> 2 percent of arrests were for weapons offenses. Sex offenses<br />

accounted for 0.7 percent of all arrests. Offenses designated as “other,” those that did not fit into<br />

the previous six categories, accounted for 22 percent of arrests.<br />

Fifty-eight percent of youth arrested in 2007 were identified as black <strong>and</strong> 41 percent were<br />

identified as white. As previously mentioned, Hispanic youth arrested in 2007 could appear in<br />

any race category, depending on their specific demography <strong>and</strong> the reporting practices of local<br />

law enforcement. Most youth arrestees were 15 or 16 years old (29 percent <strong>and</strong> 38 percent,<br />

respectively). Most arrestees were also male (78 percent). Map 1 compares county rate changes<br />

in youth arrests from 2002 to 2007.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!