May 31, 2013 - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry
May 31, 2013 - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry
May 31, 2013 - Phoenix Sinclair Inquiry
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
B.D. MCKENZIE - DR.EX. (OLSON) MAY <strong>31</strong>, <strong>2013</strong><br />
1<br />
Q<br />
-- what we'll call the traditional protection<br />
2<br />
approach that was --<br />
3<br />
4<br />
A<br />
Q<br />
Yeah.<br />
-- applied in Manitoba.<br />
5<br />
6<br />
A Yeah. In the, in the Manitoba context, the<br />
definition of differential response is closely allied with<br />
7<br />
the notion of family enhancement services.<br />
It mirrors the<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
model that has been applied in places like Minnesota and<br />
other American, other American states, and probably Western<br />
Australia.<br />
What it consists of is the development of<br />
essentially two streams of service, so a referral comes in<br />
to the agency, it is reviewed at the intake level, and<br />
there's a determination made whether safety of the child in<br />
15<br />
the immediate future is at risk or not.<br />
And if it is not<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
at risk immediately, the case could be referred to what we<br />
would call the differential response or family enhancement<br />
stream. If it is at risk, it would be referred to the more<br />
19<br />
traditional child protection stream.<br />
And in the child<br />
20<br />
21<br />
protection stream, the focus would be on investigation and<br />
the evidence around neglect and abuse and whether court<br />
22<br />
23<br />
action or other kinds of services are, are required.<br />
would be the investigation stream.<br />
That<br />
24<br />
25<br />
In the family enhancement stream, the approach<br />
would be to avoid the investigation focus and still over a<br />
- 47 -