Global-Report-Living-Colour-dr2-2
Global-Report-Living-Colour-dr2-2
Global-Report-Living-Colour-dr2-2
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Inclusive Communities = Stronger Communities<br />
GLOBAL REPORT ON ARTICLE 19: THE RIGHT TO LIVE AND BE INCLUDED IN THE COMMUNITY<br />
117<br />
Both mistakes that we have learned from and in some<br />
instances mistakes that we continue to make. Some of the<br />
most important of these would include:<br />
‰ Cost Savings<br />
Many of the early efforts to close institutions were<br />
motivated, at least in part, by the lure of reduced<br />
costs of community supports as compared to<br />
institutional costs. This initial cost saving was due<br />
primarily to the disparity between institutional wages<br />
and community-based wages. In some countries this<br />
gap has been closed but it continues to be an issue in<br />
finding and keeping good support people in the<br />
community.<br />
While reduced costs should never be<br />
the predominant consideration, the cost<br />
neutrality of the conversion from<br />
institutional model to a communitybased<br />
model does pose increased<br />
challenges to securing needed<br />
government and community approval<br />
and endorsement. Furthermore in<br />
jurisdictions where only those people<br />
who live in institutions receive state<br />
sponsored support, the shift to<br />
community supports would require the<br />
opening up of resources to all people<br />
with intellectrual disability.<br />
Photo: Ulrich Eigner<br />
Finally, while the average cost per individual living in<br />
an institution may be higher than for that person to<br />
live in the community with support, there are<br />
transactional costs associated with the closure<br />
process which require an initial investment. In the<br />
short term, using cost savings as a motivation for<br />
closing institutions is a mistake.