27.08.2014 Views

Global-Report-Living-Colour-dr2-2

Global-Report-Living-Colour-dr2-2

Global-Report-Living-Colour-dr2-2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120<br />

Inclusive Communities = Stronger Communities<br />

GLOBAL REPORT ON ARTICLE 19: THE RIGHT TO LIVE AND BE INCLUDED IN THE COMMUNITY<br />

AUSTRALIA “Governments are not<br />

being held accountable for what they<br />

have agreed to under the CRDP. There<br />

are not “a lot of votes” in the provision<br />

of disability services, and little pressure<br />

from the public to deliver or improve<br />

disability services. Many people with<br />

disabilities and their families and carers<br />

do not have a strong voice to influence<br />

the delivery of services. There is an<br />

important place for campaigns and<br />

external advocates to hold governments<br />

accountable and to raise awareness of<br />

people's needs and rights.”<br />

advocates are often given little or no choice in<br />

housing options, often being referred to seniors’<br />

residences, nursing homes, and/or other<br />

inappropriate long term care settings. Additionally,<br />

the size of these settings also continue to grow as<br />

governments cut back spending in the social sector.<br />

‰ Something is Better Than Nothing<br />

In many countries, particularly low income countries<br />

where community supports and services to families<br />

and individuals are minimal or nonexistent<br />

institutions are being considered as a legitimate<br />

response to the critical need for support services.<br />

Sometimes, due to cultural issues, but more often<br />

because no other services are available or being<br />

offered, families mistakenly see this offer of<br />

institutional care as a step forward.<br />

‰ Services as Outcomes<br />

Many deinstitutionalization processes still measure<br />

success in terms of the number of buildings closed,<br />

placements made, and residential options created.<br />

Doing so however confuses “tools” with outcomes.<br />

The closure of an institution is not the goal; it is<br />

merely the result of assisting people to take their<br />

rightful place in community. If in helping<br />

people leave an institution we do not ensure<br />

that they have meaningful lives in community,<br />

then the process is seriously flawed. Many<br />

countries continue to rely almost exclusively on<br />

traditional residential models such as group<br />

homes. Yet a move to a group home is a<br />

“success” only if it provides a vehicle through<br />

which the person can create for themselves a<br />

meaningful and participatory life in community.<br />

Experience has taught us that options such as<br />

group homes, while an expedient tool to assist<br />

in the deinstitutionalization process, do not<br />

necessarily enable meaningful lives in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!