10.10.2014 Views

Tutorials Manual

Tutorials Manual

Tutorials Manual

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chemkin 4.1.1<br />

Chapter 4: Materials Problems<br />

As a simulation that marches forward from the inlet state, this sample problem has no<br />

“initial guess” for the gas composition, but Surface Fractions are provided on the<br />

Species-specific Data tab of the C1_ Plasma PFR panel. These site fractions provide<br />

initial estimates for the surface state of the channel inlet. An initial pseudo-steady<br />

calculation will be performed to determine consistent surface state based on these<br />

estimates and the inlet gas composition, prior to the channel integration. The Sheath<br />

Loss parameter on the Material-specific Data tab of the C1_ Plasma PFR panel<br />

describes the ion energy gained crossing the sheath.<br />

4.3.2.3 Project Results<br />

Figure 4-29 shows the profile of electrical power deposited into the plasma as a<br />

function of distance down the Plug Flow Reactor. As expected, the mole fractions of<br />

the electrons and atomic chlorine, shown in Figure 4-30 and Figure 4-31, respectively,<br />

generally follow the plasma power profile, with differing degrees of non-linearity. This<br />

is consistent with the fact that the Cl is created in the plasma by electron-impact<br />

dissociation of molecular chlorine. The mole fractions for the Cl + +<br />

and Cl 2 ions, shown<br />

in Figure 4-32 also follow the plasma power profile.<br />

Figure 4-29<br />

Spacial Chlorine Plasma—Plasma Power vs. Distance<br />

© 2007 Reaction Design 146 RD0411-C20-000-001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!