10.10.2014 Views

Tutorials Manual

Tutorials Manual

Tutorials Manual

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2: Combustion in Gas-phase Processes<br />

<strong>Tutorials</strong> <strong>Manual</strong><br />

C1_R5 or reactor C1_R7. This CO spike resembles the one we observe in a typical<br />

flame zone and makes us believe that the flame zone ends before reaching reactor<br />

C1_R7. The predicted CO mole fraction in reactor C1_R7 is also lower than its<br />

adiabatic flame value and is consistent with our observation for the post-flame region.<br />

Figure 2-40<br />

Jet Flame Network—CO Distribution<br />

One of the advantages of using a reactor network is the ability to predict NO formation<br />

without running a full CFD calculation with detailed chemistry. The NO profile in<br />

Figure 2-41 shows that NO starts to form in the flame zone (reactors C1_R3, C1_R4,<br />

and C1_R5) and continues to rise in the hot post-flame region (reactor C1_R7). We<br />

can find out which NO formation mechanism is responsible for the NO increase in the<br />

high temperature region. In the absence of fuel nitrogen, NO in our jet flame can be<br />

formed via prompt NO and thermal NO mechanisms. 19 Since the prompt NO<br />

mechanism is characterized by the existence of radicals such as CH and HCN, we<br />

can plot the profiles of these radicals to find out the region where thermal NO is the<br />

dominant NO formation mechanism. From the profiles in Figure 2-42, we can see that<br />

all prompt-NO–related radicals disappear in the post-flame region (reactor C1_R7).<br />

so we can conclude that thermal NO is the main NO formation mechanism in the hot<br />

post-flame region. The reactor model also shows that, unlike gas temperature and CO<br />

mole fraction, the “exit” NO mole fraction is far below its equilibrium value. This is in<br />

accord with the fact that the characteristic chemical time scale of NO is greater than<br />

the fluid mechanical time scale of our jet-flame system.<br />

19. Miller and Bowman, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 15:287-338 (1989).<br />

RD0411-C20-000-001 63 © 2007 Reaction Design

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!