02.11.2012 Views

Adult Literacy in America - National Center for Education Statistics ...

Adult Literacy in America - National Center for Education Statistics ...

Adult Literacy in America - National Center for Education Statistics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 ......Introduction<br />

Further <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on the design of the sample, the survey adm<strong>in</strong>istration,<br />

the statistical analyses and special studies that were conducted, and the validity<br />

of the literacy scales will be available <strong>in</strong> a <strong>for</strong>thcom<strong>in</strong>g technical report, to be<br />

published <strong>in</strong> 1994.<br />

Report<strong>in</strong>g the Results<br />

The results of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Adult</strong> <strong>Literacy</strong> Survey are reported us<strong>in</strong>g three<br />

scales, each rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0 to 500: a prose scale, a document scale, and a<br />

quantitative scale. The scores on each scale represent degrees of proficiency<br />

along that particular dimension of literacy. For example, a low score (below<br />

225) on the document scale <strong>in</strong>dicates that an <strong>in</strong>dividual has very limited skills <strong>in</strong><br />

process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation from tables, charts, graphs, maps, and the like (even<br />

those that are brief and uncomplicated). On the other hand, a high score<br />

(above 375) <strong>in</strong>dicates advanced skills <strong>in</strong> per<strong>for</strong>m<strong>in</strong>g a variety of tasks that<br />

<strong>in</strong>volve the use of complex documents.<br />

Survey participants received proficiency scores accord<strong>in</strong>g to their<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance on the survey tasks. A relatively small proportion of the<br />

respondents answered only a part of the survey, and an imputation procedure<br />

was used to make the best possible estimates of their proficiencies. This<br />

procedure and related issues are detailed <strong>in</strong> the technical report.<br />

Most respondents tended to obta<strong>in</strong> similar, though not identical, scores on<br />

the three literacy scales. This does not mean, however, that the underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

skills <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> prose, document, and quantitative literacy are the same. Each<br />

scale provides some unique <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation, especially when comparisons are<br />

made across groups def<strong>in</strong>ed by variables such as race/ethnicity, education, and<br />

age.<br />

The literacy scales allow us not only to summarize results <strong>for</strong> various<br />

subpopulations, but also to determ<strong>in</strong>e the relative difficulty of the literacy tasks<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the survey. In other words, just as <strong>in</strong>dividuals received scale scores<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to their per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>in</strong> the assessment, the literacy tasks received<br />

specific scale values accord<strong>in</strong>g to their difficulty, as determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of the adults who participated <strong>in</strong> the survey. Previous research has<br />

shown that the difficulty of a literacy task, and there<strong>for</strong>e its placement on the<br />

literacy scale, is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by three factors: the structure of the material —<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, exposition, narrative, table, graph, map, or advertisement; the<br />

content of the material and/or the context from which it is drawn —<strong>for</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!