02.11.2012 Views

Adult Literacy in America - National Center for Education Statistics ...

Adult Literacy in America - National Center for Education Statistics ...

Adult Literacy in America - National Center for Education Statistics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NALS<br />

72 ......Section III<br />

The response probabilities <strong>for</strong> two tasks on the prose scale are displayed <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 3.1. The difficulty of the first task is measured at the 250 po<strong>in</strong>t on the<br />

scale, and the second task is at the 350 po<strong>in</strong>t. This means that an <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

would have to score at the 250 po<strong>in</strong>t on the prose scale to have an 80 percent<br />

chance (that is, a .8 probability) of respond<strong>in</strong>g correctly to Task 1. <strong>Adult</strong>s<br />

scor<strong>in</strong>g at the 200 po<strong>in</strong>t on the prose scale have only a 40 percent chance of<br />

respond<strong>in</strong>g correctly to this task, whereas those scor<strong>in</strong>g at the 300 po<strong>in</strong>t and<br />

above would be expected to rarely miss this task and others like it.<br />

In contrast, an <strong>in</strong>dividual would need to score at the 350 po<strong>in</strong>t to have an<br />

80 percent chance of respond<strong>in</strong>g correctly to Task 2. While <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

per<strong>for</strong>m<strong>in</strong>g at the 250 po<strong>in</strong>t would have an 80 percent chance of success on the<br />

first task, their probability of answer<strong>in</strong>g the more difficult second task correctly<br />

is only 20 percent. An <strong>in</strong>dividual scor<strong>in</strong>g at the 300 po<strong>in</strong>t is likely to succeed on<br />

this more difficult task only half the time.<br />

Probabilities of Successful Per<strong>for</strong>mance on Two Prose Tasks by Individuals at<br />

Selected Po<strong>in</strong>ts on the Prose Scale<br />

Probability of Successful Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

150 200 250 300 350 400<br />

<strong>Adult</strong>s' Average Prose Proficiency<br />

Task 1<br />

Task 2<br />

Source: U.S. Department of <strong>Education</strong>, <strong>National</strong> <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong>, <strong>National</strong> <strong>Adult</strong> <strong>Literacy</strong> Survey, 1992.<br />

An analogy may help clarify the <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation presented <strong>for</strong> the two prose<br />

tasks. The relationship between task difficulty and <strong>in</strong>dividual proficiency is<br />

much like the high jump event <strong>in</strong> track and field, <strong>in</strong> which an athlete tries to<br />

jump over a bar that is placed at <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g heights. Each high jumper has a<br />

height at which he or she is proficient. That is, he or she is able to clear the bar<br />

at that height with a high probability of success, and can clear the bar at lower<br />

Figure 3.1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!