02.11.2012 Views

Adult Literacy in America - National Center for Education Statistics ...

Adult Literacy in America - National Center for Education Statistics ...

Adult Literacy in America - National Center for Education Statistics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NALS<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Percentages of <strong>Adult</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Poverty, by <strong>Literacy</strong> Level<br />

PROSE<br />

DOCUMENT<br />

Level Level<br />

43<br />

41<br />

23<br />

20<br />

8<br />

4<br />

12<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Level<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Note: <strong>Adult</strong>s <strong>in</strong> poverty are those who are either poor or near poor.<br />

Level 1 0 to 225<br />

Level 2 226 to 275<br />

Level 3 276 to 325<br />

Level 4 326 to 375<br />

Level 5 376 to 500<br />

Sources of Nonwage Income and Support<br />

6<br />

8<br />

12<br />

Figure 2.5<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Percentage <strong>in</strong> Each Level <strong>in</strong> Poverty<br />

Source: U.S. Department of <strong>Education</strong>, <strong>National</strong> <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong>, <strong>National</strong> <strong>Adult</strong> <strong>Literacy</strong> Survey, 1992.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7<br />

12<br />

22<br />

QUANTITATIVE<br />

Survey participants provided detailed <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on the types of nonwage<br />

<strong>in</strong>come and support they or anyone <strong>in</strong> their family had received <strong>in</strong> the year<br />

preced<strong>in</strong>g the survey. Two particular types of nonwage <strong>in</strong>come which reflect<br />

socioeconomic status are contrasted here. The skills of those who received food<br />

stamps are of <strong>in</strong>terest, because this program is publicly funded. Further, the<br />

competencies of adults who received <strong>in</strong>terest from sav<strong>in</strong>gs or other bank<br />

accounts are of <strong>in</strong>terest, because sav<strong>in</strong>gs help to provide a buffer <strong>in</strong> the event of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terruptions <strong>in</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

<strong>Adult</strong>s who per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>in</strong> Level 1 on the prose scale were far more likely<br />

than those who per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>in</strong> Level 5 to report that their family received food<br />

stamps (FIGURE 2.6). Only 1 percent of those <strong>in</strong> the highest prose level<br />

received food stamps, compared with 17 percent <strong>in</strong> the lowest level. Similar<br />

patterns are seen on the document and quantitative scales.<br />

Conversely, the percentages of adults who reported receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

from sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the past year <strong>in</strong>creases significantly across the five levels on<br />

each scale. For example, 85 percent of adults <strong>in</strong> Level 5 on the quantitative<br />

scale earned <strong>in</strong>terest from sav<strong>in</strong>gs, compared with only 53 percent of those <strong>in</strong><br />

Level 3 and just 23 percent of those <strong>in</strong> Level 1.<br />

44<br />

Section II ......61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!