Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO
Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO
Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Community</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>accessing</strong> <strong>for</strong>estry <strong>voluntary</strong> <strong>carbon</strong> markets<br />
According to studies and trials carried out with local communities during<br />
the K-TGAL project (see Box 2), 31 project teams can easily be trained<br />
in the combined use of the GPS and CyberTracker mentioned above,<br />
as well as with other similar user-friendly tools such as Google Earth.<br />
Besides K-TGAL itself, one of the best examples of this is the Scolel Té<br />
project in Mexico, which demonstrated that farmers can make their own<br />
measurements of stock increases in <strong>for</strong>ests under their protection, <strong>for</strong><br />
which they could then receive payments under the VCM. 32 Box 9 outlines<br />
the procedures that these communities followed in the mapping stage<br />
of the projects.<br />
Box 9: Three community-based mapping activities<br />
1. Identification of <strong>for</strong>est inventory team members. These need to<br />
be people who are familiar with the <strong>for</strong>est and are active in its<br />
management. At least some must be literate/numerate.<br />
2. Creation of a base map, database and <strong>carbon</strong> calculator programme<br />
through a handheld GPS device. Access to the internet will be<br />
needed to reference this in<strong>for</strong>mation and transfer to a computer<br />
to create a useful map.<br />
31 Peters-Guarin, G. & McCall, M.K. 2010. <strong>Community</strong> Carbon Forestry <strong>for</strong> REDD:<br />
Using CyberTracker <strong>for</strong> Mapping and Visualizing of <strong>Community</strong> Forest Management<br />
in the Context of REDD. K:TGAL Report, University of Twente, Enschede, the<br />
Netherlands, and CIGA UNAM, Morelia, Mexico. (Available at http://www.iapad.org/<br />
publications/ppgis/CyberTracker_MMM_<strong>for</strong>est_<strong>carbon</strong>_REDD.pdf)<br />
32 Corbera, E.; C. González Soberanis; and K. Brown. 2009. Institutional<br />
dimensions of payments <strong>for</strong> ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico’s <strong>carbon</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong>estry programme. Ecological Economics 68, 743-761; Bey, A. 2009. Using<br />
Technology to Enable <strong>Community</strong>-Based Forest Monitoring: From theory to<br />
implementation challenges and opportunities. November December 3, 2009<br />
http://international.helveta.com/assets/Downloadablefile/WhitePaper_CIEarth_<br />
AdiaBey_091203-16122.pdf<br />
120