Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO
Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO
Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Community</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>accessing</strong> <strong>for</strong>estry <strong>voluntary</strong> <strong>carbon</strong> markets<br />
the disbursement of revenues on behalf of the sellers, with the prior<br />
written agreement and consent of all seller or buyer parties.<br />
Emission reductions can be sold without being validated and verified<br />
i.e. without having become the Verified Emission Reductions (VERs)<br />
which can be accepted <strong>for</strong> sale on the VCM. However, the failure to<br />
verify <strong>carbon</strong> credits usually affects the price so seriously that investors<br />
often retain all payment until they are verified and the required quality<br />
is delivered. In the case of unverified <strong>carbon</strong> credits, two models <strong>for</strong> sale<br />
are used:<br />
• Forward sales: bearing a relatively low price, but an obligation <strong>for</strong> the<br />
seller to per<strong>for</strong>m project activities and ultimately to create verified<br />
credits. Project developers, particularly if they are small holders or<br />
local communities, may well prefer this sales method, despite the<br />
low price, as up-front funding is needed <strong>for</strong> the implementation of<br />
project activities. This is one of the main ways in which dishonest<br />
brokers can defraud them.<br />
• Spot sales: sales made as and when <strong>carbon</strong> credits are generated.<br />
The price is higher, mainly because there are less risks <strong>for</strong> the buyer<br />
at this stage. The credits may not yet have been verified, but there is<br />
sufficient objective evidence of their existence.<br />
In either case, sales agreements made without verification under VCS or<br />
another <strong>carbon</strong> standard, or without an ERPA, carry significant risks <strong>for</strong><br />
local communities.<br />
Some clauses of an ERPA relate to general good practice e.g. project<br />
registration, monitoring, etc. However, the more obligations listed,<br />
the higher the chance of the contract being terminated. It is there<strong>for</strong>e<br />
important to avoid including unreasonable obligations <strong>for</strong> local<br />
communities, as well as to reduce opportunities <strong>for</strong> the investor to<br />
withdraw from the agreement or <strong>for</strong>ce changes to the project design.<br />
The main focus of a good ERPA should be <strong>for</strong> the investor and the project<br />
152