Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO
Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO
Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Community</strong> <strong>guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>accessing</strong> <strong>for</strong>estry <strong>voluntary</strong> <strong>carbon</strong> markets<br />
2.6.1 Environmental benefits<br />
Losing <strong>for</strong>ests means losing environmental services. A damaged <strong>for</strong>est<br />
will not be able to support the following essential functions:<br />
• Watershed protection and improved water quality;<br />
• Biodiversity conservation;<br />
• Nutrient cycling;<br />
• Soil conservation and stabilization;<br />
• Reducing the risk of natural disasters;<br />
• Protecting coastal areas; and<br />
• Creating habitats <strong>for</strong> wildlife and plants.<br />
Climate change will affect many of these functions with potentially<br />
devastating impacts on the environment, and the lives and livelihoods<br />
of people who depend on <strong>for</strong>ests.<br />
All of these ecosystem functions are important <strong>for</strong> a wide range of<br />
people, not just to those who manage the <strong>for</strong>ests that provide them.<br />
In recognition of this, interest in Payment <strong>for</strong> Ecosystem Services (PES)<br />
is growing. PES schemes depend on finding people or organizations<br />
that are willing to pay, on a regular basis, <strong>for</strong> receiving these services.<br />
It is also challenging <strong>for</strong> PES schemes to succeed in delivering financial<br />
benefits to (the right) local <strong>for</strong>est managers and communities. The<br />
<strong>for</strong>estry VCM is essentially a <strong>for</strong>m of PES – in which the ecosystem<br />
service is climate change mitigation – and the experiences of existing<br />
PES schemes hold valuable lessons <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>estry VCM. In the not too<br />
distant future it may become possible to ‘bundle’ several ecosystem and<br />
environmental services together (such as climate change mitigation,<br />
biodiversity conservation and watershed management, <strong>for</strong> example)<br />
where appropriate. This would also reduce the risk of double accounting<br />
– where two or more PES schemes overlap on the same area.<br />
56