27.10.2014 Views

Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO

Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO

Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon ... - FAO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Background in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Methodology<br />

Projects must also be from an eligible project type or activity.<br />

Re<strong>for</strong>estation, improved <strong>for</strong>est management and avoiding de<strong>for</strong>estation<br />

or <strong>for</strong>est degradation are all types of activities that are eligible under<br />

various standards (the methods are described in more detail in Chapter<br />

2). The figures below illustrate how the different <strong>for</strong>estry activities<br />

actually generate <strong>carbon</strong> benefits. It is important to note that <strong>carbon</strong><br />

benefits are always quantified against the baseline: it is the difference<br />

between what would have happened in the Business As Usual (BAU)<br />

scenario and what is expected to happen in the project case that matters.<br />

That includes situations whereby the project case reduces emissions in<br />

comparison to the baseline but is actually still causing net emissions. An<br />

example is going from unsustainable, high impact logging to reduced<br />

impact logging (see Figures 1 a, b, c and d <strong>for</strong> graphical illustrations).<br />

Figure 1: Generating ‘<strong>carbon</strong> benefits’ from <strong>for</strong>estry activities<br />

(a) BAU is non-<strong>for</strong>est cover, project case is af<strong>for</strong>estation<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!