08.11.2014 Views

1961 US Commission on Civil Rights Report Book 2 - University of ...

1961 US Commission on Civil Rights Report Book 2 - University of ...

1961 US Commission on Civil Rights Report Book 2 - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

January January<br />

1958 <str<strong>on</strong>g>1961</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

(percent) (percent)<br />

Track I l 7- o 20. 7<br />

Track II 45-9 5 2 - 4<br />

Track III 47.1 21.3<br />

Terminal educati<strong>on</strong> 2 5.6<br />

1 St. Louis sec<strong>on</strong>dary schools operate 3 basic curriculum tracks: track I for aboveaverage<br />

achieversj track II for average achievers, and track III for below-average<br />

achievers.<br />

2 This classificati<strong>on</strong> includes graduating students, who because <strong>of</strong> intellectual limitati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

and age do not appear to be able to benefit from the regular track III program.<br />

The key to the entire program seems to have been inspired leadership.<br />

Dr. Shepard encouraged principals to initiate programs for raising pupil<br />

performance and changing teachers' attitudes toward the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

higher pupil achievement. 42 Teachers were adm<strong>on</strong>ished to stop "teaching<br />

by supposed IQ"; parents were told <strong>of</strong> the poor performance <strong>of</strong> their<br />

children, urged to cooperate with the school <strong>on</strong> homework assignments,<br />

and instructed how to do so. 43 Children were spurred by assembly<br />

programs, field trips, peptalks, h<strong>on</strong>or assemblies, and posters. 44<br />

Dr. Shepard explained to the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> his c<strong>on</strong>cept <strong>of</strong> the differentiated<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> pupils he calls teaching by IQ, with the following<br />

story: 48<br />

. . . here was a teacher who had copied the IQ numbers down the<br />

line from a list in the principal's <strong>of</strong>fice . . . throughout the semester<br />

if the teacher called <strong>on</strong> Mary, let us say, with an IQ <strong>of</strong> 119, she<br />

followed somewhat this pattern: If Mary didn't resp<strong>on</strong>d quickly,<br />

"Well, now, come <strong>on</strong>, Mary. You know you can do this. You<br />

know how we did this yesterday," or bring up an analogous situati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

She encouraged, she stimulated, until Mary came up with<br />

the proper answer, or what the teacher at least c<strong>on</strong>sidered an adequate<br />

<strong>on</strong>e. However, when she called <strong>on</strong> poor John with his 74<br />

IQ, if he mumbled something fairly audible, why, this was w<strong>on</strong>derful<br />

; pat him <strong>on</strong> the back and, "Be sure and be here tomorrow. You<br />

can wash the windows and help move the piano and water the<br />

flowers, and the erasers must be washed," and so forth. This is<br />

the kind <strong>of</strong> encouragement that he got with a 74. This is teaching<br />

by IQ. She was a little horrified at the end <strong>of</strong> the semester when<br />

she turned in her grades. She looked under the glass and saw that<br />

the columns she had copied for IQ's were locker numbers. Now,<br />

this is about what goes <strong>on</strong>.<br />

The table below, showing the improved performance <strong>of</strong> the children in<br />

the Banneker schools (which by January <str<strong>on</strong>g>1961</str<strong>on</strong>g> had equaled nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

norms), suggests that elaborate and costly remedial programs may not<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!