08.11.2014 Views

1961 US Commission on Civil Rights Report Book 2 - University of ...

1961 US Commission on Civil Rights Report Book 2 - University of ...

1961 US Commission on Civil Rights Report Book 2 - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In another county with a heavy ratio <strong>of</strong> Negro populati<strong>on</strong> there were 12<br />

stati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>on</strong>ly i <strong>of</strong> which was for Negroes.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g the libraries maintaining racially separate branches, the 30<br />

reporting hours <strong>of</strong> service showed an average <strong>of</strong> 33.3 hours weekly service<br />

at the white branches and 15.2 at the Negro branches. Two libraries<br />

reported being open to Negroes <strong>on</strong>ly during the summer.<br />

Twenty-eight <strong>of</strong> the 39 segregated libraries reported <strong>on</strong> the size <strong>of</strong><br />

their book collecti<strong>on</strong>s. Nineteen reported an average <strong>of</strong> over 28,000<br />

circulating and 959 reference books at white branches and an average <strong>of</strong><br />

4,379 circulating and 161 reference books at the Negro branch. As to<br />

reference books in these 19 libraries, 2 reported no reference books for<br />

Negroes while in the remaining 17 there were between 1.2 and 15.2<br />

times as many reference books for whites as for Negroes.<br />

Seven libraries reported <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> the combined reference and circulating<br />

collecti<strong>on</strong>s. The average in white libraries was 30,555 as against<br />

8,323 at the branches for Negroes—the range <strong>of</strong> difference being between<br />

3 and 6.8 times as many books in the white, as in the Negro<br />

libraries.<br />

The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>'s survey included <strong>on</strong>ly about <strong>on</strong>e-third <strong>of</strong> the<br />

public libraries in the 17 Southern States receiving Federal aid under<br />

the Library Services Act. The informati<strong>on</strong> received shows clearly that<br />

in some cases services are not available to Negro residents at all though<br />

they are available to whites. In others, some provisi<strong>on</strong> is made for<br />

Negroes in separate inferior branches. Surely these discriminati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

violate the Federal law authorizing financial aid, and requiring that<br />

services shall be free to all residents <strong>of</strong> the community served. Surely<br />

they also violate the equal protecti<strong>on</strong> clause, which does not permit<br />

racial distincti<strong>on</strong>s in public educati<strong>on</strong>al facilities.<br />

On April 13, <str<strong>on</strong>g>1961</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> addressed a letter to the Secretary<br />

<strong>of</strong> Health, Educati<strong>on</strong>, and Welfare, requesting informati<strong>on</strong> as to the<br />

following:<br />

(1) amount <strong>of</strong> funds allotted to the Southern States under the<br />

Library Services Act <strong>of</strong> 1956 for fiscal <str<strong>on</strong>g>1961</str<strong>on</strong>g>;<br />

(2) the existence <strong>of</strong> any policy established by agency regulati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

<strong>on</strong> the equal availability to all residents <strong>of</strong> the community <strong>of</strong><br />

library facilities receiving Federal aid; and<br />

(3) any requirement by the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Commissi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>er <strong>of</strong> Educati<strong>on</strong>, in approving<br />

State plans, that the regulati<strong>on</strong>s prescribed by the<br />

State library agency c<strong>on</strong>tain such a provisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

In his reply <strong>of</strong> May 10, <str<strong>on</strong>g>1961</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Assistant Secretary supplied the<br />

fiscal data requested, but failed to disclose the department's policy,<br />

if any, with regard to enforcement <strong>of</strong> compliance with the provisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

<strong>of</strong> the statute requiring the libraries to "serve free all residents <strong>of</strong> a<br />

community, district, or regi<strong>on</strong>."<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!