11.11.2014 Views

routledge+history+of+literature+in+english

routledge+history+of+literature+in+english

routledge+history+of+literature+in+english

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102 The Renaissance 1485–1660<br />

I all alone beweep my outcast state,<br />

And trouble deaf heaven with my bootless cries,<br />

And look upon myself, and curse my fate . . .<br />

(Sonnet 29)<br />

There is a truth of emotion and of constancy in the affections of the<br />

poetic ‘I’. Homoerotic the attraction to his male love certainly is:<br />

. . . my state<br />

Like to the lark at break of day arising<br />

From sullen earth, sings hymns at heaven’s gate;<br />

For thy sweet love remember’d such wealth brings<br />

That then I scorn to change my state with kings.<br />

(Sonnet 29)<br />

The more modern word ‘homosexual’ does not really apply, as Sonnet<br />

20 makes clear in its final, sexually punning lines:<br />

But since she prick’d thee out for women’s pleasure,<br />

Mine be thy love, and thy love’s use their treasure.<br />

Shakespeare has been staged, adapted, studied and adopted throughout the<br />

centuries. It is a mark of his universality that his plays have survived all the<br />

appropriations, attacks, uses and interpretations made of them. They are<br />

used institutionally in education to show what is best in high-cultural ideology;<br />

they have been read as nihilistically modern, incorrigibly reactionary, and as<br />

‘a cultural creation which has no intrinsic authority and whose validity is<br />

wide open to dispute’. It is true that Shakespeare has been made into something<br />

he was not in his own lifetime, a cultural institution and an emblem, whose<br />

quality and artistry are not in doubt. So he will no doubt survive radical and<br />

systematic counter–interpretation just as he has survived institutional<br />

appropriation from Victorian times to the present. He can be, as critics have<br />

described him, ‘our contemporary’, ‘alternative’, ‘radical’, ‘historicist’,<br />

‘subversive’, ‘traditional’ and ‘conservative’. But his plays continue to speak<br />

to audiences and readers, as ‘imagination bodies forth / The forms of things<br />

unknown’, and he explores the known and the unknown in human<br />

experience. Reinterpretation, on a wide scale of opinions from radical to<br />

hegemonic, will always be a vital part of Shakespearean study. As long as the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!