dfgiVej

78 With Love to Muhammad sa the Khātam-un-Nabiyyīn
Then, Farhan Khan goes on to demonstrate the same faulty logic
in what he alleges is the Ahmadiyya Muslim belief:
[No more laws] + [No more Prophets] = X
[No more laws] + [No more Prophets] = [No more
laws] + [No more Prophets]
[No more laws] + [No more Prophets] = [No more] * (
[laws] + [Prophets] )
[No more laws] + [No more Prophets] = [No more
laws and no more Prophets]
(The final statement can be rewritten as [no more
laws or Prophets])
Once again, Farhan Khan proves how well he wastes time on a
false premise. Had he taken the time to understand what he was
criticizing before he criticized it, he could have saved himself a
lot of time and embarrassment.
First, as stated earlier, we need to emphasize that the
Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamā‘at does not believe that 33:41 states
that there can be “no more prophets.” If an Ahmadī Muslim
made this argument, it is his or her personal opinion and the
Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamā‘at does not bear responsibility for the
personal opinions of those who have a weak understanding of
its beliefs. The correct logic of the Ahmadiyya Muslim beliefs is
presented in the same style as above for the purpose of clarity:
This is a simple way to describe the Ahmadiyya Muslim
belief and this understanding cannot be refuted. It is no wonder
why Farhan Khan chose not to refute the above belief and
sought help from the unique insight of individual Ahmadīs!