dfgiVej

Hadīth of Hazrat ‘Alī ra and Lā Nabiyya Ba‘adī 117
Here the word بدی [ba’adī] is not in the context
of ازa بدت [after his time] because Hazrat
Hārūn as did not outlive Hazrat Mūsā as . Hence,
the implied conclusion was not for a period
after the Holy Prophet sa for Hazrat ‘Alī ra . As a
result, there was no reason to make the
exception of a period after the Holy Prophet sa
for Hazrat ‘Alī ra .
Farhan Khan did not write his chapter in criticism of Islām
Ahmadiyya alone. He wrote it also in criticism of Hazrat Shāh
Waliullāh Mohaddas Dehlavī, who was one of the greatest
scholars of hadīth in the history of Islām.
The problem is that Farhan Khan continues to insist upon
his meanings in order to believe in the coming back of Hazrat
‘Īsā as as a Prophet after the Holy Prophet Muhammad sa . He
should learn that Hazrat ‘Īsā as has died according to the Holy
Qur’ān and this has been proven in the chapter entitled The
Death of Hazrat ‘Īsā as .
Question for Farhan Khan:
1. Does he think that the conclusions drawn by Hazrat Shāh
Waliullāh Mohaddas Dehlavī rh are wrong or just lengthy
reinterpretation 108 ? If the answer is ‘no’, why does he not
accept it?
108
Khan, With Love, Page 19