dfgiVej

234 With Love to Muhammad sa the Khātam-un-Nabiyyīn
20. Hazrat Nawāb Siddīque Hassan Khān writes in Iqtarābus-Sā‘ah,
Page 162:
The hadīth “Lā Wahya Ba‘da Mautī” [There is no revelation
after me] has no foundation. Instead, the words “Lā Nabī
Ba‘adī” [There is no prophet after me] are correct, which,
according to the scholars, mean: “There shall be no prophet
after me, with a [new] law that abrogates mine.”
In view of the significant number of quotations presented here,
it is obvious that opposition to the Ahmadiyya position will
inevitably entail disowning so many of these illustrious saints of
Islām. Not to believe in a concept or opinion of a saint or a
mujaddid is acceptable but to totally deny his righteousness and
his well-proven claims of having a special relationship with
Allāh the Almighty is an act which draws the displeasure of
God. If someone wishes to deny these statements made by the
sahāba, ā’immah, and the mujaddidīn, and chooses to accept
Farhan Khan’s version of Islām, then it is his or her personal
choice for which they will have to answer to God.
It should be remembered here that regardless of all the
criticisms made by non-Ahmadīs against the Ahmadiyya
Muslim Community, they themselves hold the belief that the
Latter Day Messiah would be a prophet of Allāh! Shaikh Ibn
Hajar rh comments on this when he says:
Hazrat ‘Īsā as is an honored prophet. After he comes
down he would still be a prophet and messenger. An
affirmation by a person of no account that he will be
only a member of the Muslim community is not
correct, inasmuch as he being one of the Muslims and