dfgiVej

168 With Love to Muhammad sa the Khātam-un-Nabiyyīn
and no messenger’ means, ‘there can be no one with a (new) law
after me.’” 166
Therefore, it can be concluded that both Hazrat Ibn
‘Arabī rh and Hazrat Imām Shi‘rānī rh did not believe in the
absolute end of prophets based on the statement “there is no
prophet after me” and it can also be concluded, without doubt,
that the Messiah for the Latter Days would be a prophet of
Allāh!
The Status of the Promised Messiah as
At the end of his chapter, Farhan Khan criticizes the
writings of the Promised Messiah as by saying, “If by zill and
buruz, [Hazrat Mirzā Ghulām] Ahmad [ as ] was referring to the
type of nabī detailed by Ibn ‘Arabī rh , then the only difference
between Ibn ‘Arabī[ rh ] and what Ahmad[ as ] wrote is semantic....
If this is the case, then this is not a special status nor one special
glory or honor beyond the other awliya.’” 167
This is yet another ridiculous argument! As we asked
earlier, Farhan Khan should first explain this: What will be the
status of the nubuwwah of the Promised Messiah as of the Latter
Days? Will he be a prophet with a special status and special
glory beyond the other Awliyā’ or not? If he says “no,” then this
is against the following statements of the Holy Prophet
Muhammad sa :
166
Al-Yawāqīt wal Jawāhir, Volume 2, Page 42
167
Khan, With Love, Page 40