dfgiVej

4 With Love to Muhammad sa the Khātam-un-Nabiyyīn
Farhan Khan also argues that his position that the Holy
Prophet sa is the last chronological prophet is simple and
straightforward while the Ahmadiyya Muslim position is
complicated. This argument represents an appeal-to-emotion
fallacy, which attempts to obscure the logical argument with a
superficial appeal. This tactic is typically applied when there is
an inexplicable contradiction. For example, while Farhan Khan
believes the Holy Prophet Muhammad sa is the last prophet in
the sense of time and place, he conveniently forgets that he
himself believes in the coming of a prophet after the Holy
Prophet Muhammad sa : ‘Īsā bin Mariam as . Strangely, Khan
believes that ‘Īsā as is somehow precluded from being “the last”
because he came earlier as well.
To illustrate the matter in another way: If John enters a
room and leaves, then Fred enters the room and leaves, then
John re-enters the room and leaves; who was the last person in
the room?
Obviously, John was the last person in the room. However,
Khan’s reasoning would like us to believe that Fred is the last
person in the room, while simultaneously believing that John is
the last person in the room. The two conditions are mutually
exclusive and present a contradiction.