dfgiVej

َ
ّ
Foreword
Intellectual differences are found in every religion of the
world. Some are based on truth, while others on falsehood, but
they remain intellectual differences whether or not someone’s
belief is based on it. However, the subject of the finality of the
prophethood of the Holy Prophet sa regarding which non-
Ahmadī Muslims disagree with the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamā‘at
has left the form of intellectual discussion and assumed the
shape of mischief and falsehood. This is because a malicious
allegation is made against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamā‘at that
it considers Hazrat Mirzā Ghulām Ahmad Qādiānī as a Prophet
in the sense that goes against the message of the following
statements:
[There is no Prophet after me] َ
aب َّ
اِ‏ [I am the last of the Prophets] َ ْ
In other words, it is alleged that a new community and a new
religion have been established by the abrogation of the
prophethood of Hazrat Muhammad Mustafā Khātamul Anbiyā sa .
In this way, regarding this issue, false and baseless allegations
have been levelled against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamā‘at and
fictitious beliefs have been attributed to it. This is despite the
fact that those who spread this mischief and attribute falsehood
to the community hold the belief of the coming of a Prophet
after the Holy Prophet sa themselves. Their elders have written
exactly what the community believes! It is a proven fact –
attested by the Islāmic books that have been published in the
vii
لا a‏َبِ‎ ْ دِ‏ یa
‏َاءِ‏
‏ْبِ‎
aُ‎الا
aِ‎ا خِ‏ ر
ٓ