dfgiVej

Continuation of Prophethood according to Ahādīth 301
Say, had there been other gods with Him, as they say,
then they (idolaters) would have surely sought out a
way to the Owner of the Throne.
Based on this verse, the Ahmadī [Muslims] would
have to accept that it is possible for there to be other
deities worthy of worship besides Allāh because the
same if-statement is used. 297
Again, as usual, Farhan Khan used his bias to make another
straw man fallacy by attributing ridiculous beliefs to the
Ahmadī Muslims while failing to address the actual argument.
If-then statements imply that if a certain condition were to
exist, then a result would occur. Even if the if condition did not
occur, it does not negate the truth of the then result. Ahmadī
Muslims do not believe in hypothetical statements; however, if
the statements come from God or the Prophet sa , they are stated
with a purpose to guide us towards truth. The fact of the matter
is that the Ahmadiyya Muslim understanding is based on an
“if-then statement,” which is perfectly logical. The Holy
Prophet sa did not say, “If… he would have been a prophet.”
Instead, he said, “If he had lived, [then] he would surely have
been a prophet.” In other words, in the mind of the Holy
Prophet Muhammad sa , prophethood continues.
Second, Farhan Khan presents a verse of the Holy
Qur’ān, as shown above, to refute the Ahmadiyya Muslim
understanding, and to dupe a person who lacks knowledge of
the Holy Qur’ān or the Arabic language. However, to an honest
person with knowledge of the Holy Qur’ān and the Arabic
language, it clearly demonstrates the devious way with which
297
Khan, With Love, Page 27