29.11.2014 Views

Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches 2010 - Cokesbury

Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches 2010 - Cokesbury

Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches 2010 - Cokesbury

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I<br />

PERSPECTIVES ON AMERICA’S<br />

RELIGIOUS LANDSCAPE<br />

Trends & Developments, 2009<br />

TRENDS &<br />

DEVELOPMENTS, 2009<br />

Methodological Considerations<br />

The <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> & <strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Churches</strong> reports annually on data gathered<br />

from national religious bodies that reflect the religious affiliations <strong>and</strong> financial giving<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong>s. However, these data generally represent<br />

information gathered two calendar years prior to the year <strong>of</strong> publication. For instance, data<br />

reported in this <strong>2010</strong> edition <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Yearbook</strong> reflects information for 2008 that was collected<br />

by national church structures in 2009 <strong>and</strong> reported to the <strong>Yearbook</strong> at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

2009 for publication in this <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong>. This “lag time” <strong>of</strong>ten leads our readers to ask<br />

if such data is out <strong>of</strong> date by the time it is printed. In response we would give a qualified<br />

“no.” Massive national agencies such as the churches reporting through the <strong>Yearbook</strong><br />

move in their institutional lives at nearly imperceptible rates <strong>of</strong> speed. Moreover, given<br />

the vast size <strong>and</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> such diverse organizations, partial data reported more frequently<br />

might well have the unintended effect <strong>of</strong> conveying a sense <strong>of</strong> “trend” to momentary<br />

or regionally isolated patterns <strong>of</strong> reporting, affiliation <strong>and</strong>/or financial giving. Now in<br />

the 78th edition, the <strong>Yearbook</strong> believes that an annual review <strong>of</strong> data continues to provide<br />

an appropriate interval for tracking the changes in institutional patterns.<br />

No single st<strong>and</strong>ard for data collection exists across the variety <strong>of</strong> ecclesiastical structures<br />

reported in the <strong>Yearbook</strong>. Moreover, the definitions <strong>of</strong> membership <strong>and</strong> related terms<br />

differ widely from one church structure to another. This lack <strong>of</strong> universal definition <strong>and</strong><br />

collection methodology has frequently led to questions about the validity <strong>and</strong> reliability<br />

<strong>of</strong> self-reported data. Recognizing the limitations <strong>of</strong> the data reported herein, we continue<br />

to have confidence in the overall value <strong>of</strong> trends <strong>and</strong> other findings based on these figures<br />

<strong>and</strong> this methodology. While church data collection <strong>and</strong> analytical practices differ across<br />

various institutional <strong>and</strong> organizational margins, they tend to be remarkably consistent<br />

within specific organizations over time. (Where we are made aware <strong>of</strong> changes in a particular<br />

church’s reporting methods, we will note them for the reader.) This consistency<br />

within organizations brings a greater degree <strong>of</strong> confidence to the relative data <strong>of</strong> a given<br />

church over time. For the same reason the relative size <strong>of</strong> one church to another as<br />

reported here, we believe, provides an accurate picture even while lacking a degree <strong>of</strong><br />

absolute precision <strong>of</strong> membership statistics, particularly over time. Thus, we believe that<br />

the Southern Baptist Convention is roughly twice the size <strong>of</strong> The United Methodist<br />

Church, for example, <strong>and</strong> that changes relative to each other over several years are probably<br />

an accurate reflection <strong>of</strong> actual membership trends. Moreover, these data are the most<br />

exacting figures presently available, <strong>and</strong> thus serve as the national st<strong>and</strong>ard.<br />

The first eight decades <strong>of</strong> record keeping represented by the <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> &<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Churches</strong> is contained on a comprehensive Historic Archive on CD-ROM<br />

(which contains membership <strong>and</strong> financial data from 1916–1999). This CD provides a<br />

longitudinal backdrop for the analysis that follows. Only through such a longitudinal<br />

study <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>and</strong> decline in membership are we able to capture <strong>and</strong> analyze the<br />

emerging patterns. Our annual trends analysis should be regarded as a snapshot taken at<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!