26.12.2014 Views

Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam

Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam

Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 7. Mean cross sectional area, bankfull width, depth, maximum bankfull depth, <strong>and</strong> width to depth ratio measured <strong>for</strong> 4 riffles in<br />

<strong>the</strong> existing stream channel <strong>and</strong> 10 riffles in <strong>the</strong> stream channel shortly after construction in <strong>the</strong> fall <strong>of</strong> 2003 (as built) <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Young<br />

Creek State L<strong>and</strong>s Stream Restoration Project. Variance estimates <strong>for</strong> annual mean values are presented in paren<strong>the</strong>ses. Mean values<br />

between treatments were compared using a t-test, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> one tailed p-value <strong>for</strong> each comparison is presented. The percent change <strong>for</strong><br />

each parameter between treatments is also presented.<br />

Riffle Cross<br />

Sections<br />

Cross<br />

Sectional Area<br />

(ft 2 )<br />

Mean Bankfull<br />

Width (ft)<br />

Mean Bankfull<br />

Depth (ft)<br />

Maximum Bankfull<br />

Depth (ft)<br />

Width to Depth<br />

Ratio<br />

Existing 16.75 (1.58) 27.88 (22.73) 0.60 (0.008) 1.05 (0.017) 48.3 (239.6)<br />

As Built (2003) 21.99 (10.07) 16.3 (9.18) 1.24 (0.05) 1.985 (0.09) 13.7 (21.2)<br />

Percent Change 31.3% -41.5% 107.5% 89.0% -71.6%<br />

t-test P Value 0.004 6.6*10-5 7.5*10 -5 3.6*10 -5 1.1*10 -5<br />

Table 8. Mean cross sectional area, bankfull width, depth, maximum bankfull depth, <strong>and</strong> width to depth ratio measured <strong>for</strong> 2 pools in<br />

<strong>the</strong> existing stream channel <strong>and</strong> 8 pools in <strong>the</strong> stream channel shortly after construction in <strong>the</strong> fall <strong>of</strong> 2003 (as built) <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Young<br />

Creek State L<strong>and</strong>s Stream Restoration Project. Variance estimates <strong>for</strong> annual mean values are presented in paren<strong>the</strong>ses. Mean values<br />

between treatments were compared using a t-test, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> one tailed p-value <strong>for</strong> each comparison is presented. The percent change <strong>for</strong><br />

each parameter between treatments is also presented.<br />

Pool Cross<br />

Sections<br />

Cross<br />

Sectional Area<br />

(ft 2 )<br />

Mean Bankfull<br />

Width (ft)<br />

Mean Bankfull<br />

Depth (ft)<br />

Maximum Bankfull<br />

Depth (ft)<br />

Width to Depth<br />

Ratio<br />

Existing 19.25 (3.13) 23.5 (24.5) 0.79 (0.005) 2.35 (0.13) 30.14 (80.15)<br />

As Built (2003) 37.68 (65.09) 21.8 (18.0) 1.73 (0.084) 3.23 (0.42) 12.99 (12.78)<br />

Percent Change 95.7%<br />

t-test P Value 0.0076<br />

-7.18% 119.0% 0.318 37.77% -56.9%<br />

0.0012 0.053 0.0008<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!