26.12.2014 Views

Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam

Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam

Mitigation for the Construction and Operation of Libby Dam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Burbot<br />

Burbot catch rates in spring sinking gillnets since 1990 show no clear trend in<br />

abundance (Figure 38; r 2 = 0.07; p = 0.346). Burbot catch per net <strong>for</strong> spring sinking nets has<br />

averaged 0.29 fish per net, <strong>and</strong> ranged from 0.07 to 0.5 fish per net. Burbot are not readily<br />

captured in floating gill nets. Burbot catch rates in spring gillnets is however significantly <strong>and</strong><br />

positively correlated (r 2 = 0.47; P = 0.04; Figure 39) to daily catch <strong>of</strong> burbot in baited hoop<br />

traps in <strong>the</strong> stilling basin below <strong>Libby</strong> <strong>Dam</strong> (see above), suggesting that burbot abundance in<br />

<strong>Libby</strong> Reservoir may be influencing burbot abundance in <strong>the</strong> Kootenai River below <strong>Libby</strong> <strong>Dam</strong><br />

through entrainment.<br />

Catch Per Net<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

1990-2003<br />

r 2 = 0.07; p = 0.346<br />

Mean = 0.29 fish/net<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

Year<br />

Figure 38. Mean catch per net <strong>of</strong> burbot in sinking gillnets during spring gillnetting<br />

activities at <strong>the</strong> Rex<strong>for</strong>d site on <strong>Libby</strong> Reservoir, 1990-2003. The mean catch per net during<br />

<strong>the</strong> period was 0.29 fish per net.<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!