01.01.2015 Views

June 15, 2009 - District of Mission

June 15, 2009 - District of Mission

June 15, 2009 - District of Mission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26<br />

Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 2 - 13 May <strong>2009</strong> — Note to file<br />

File # MM-37779<br />

Since the January meeting the applicant has provided more detail with regard to the<br />

potential inclusion <strong>of</strong> land(s) into the ALR and the enhancement <strong>of</strong> a 41.5 ha parcel in<br />

the ALR diagonally across the Lougheed Highway to the northwest <strong>of</strong> the subject<br />

property. That neighbouring property is described as the remainder <strong>of</strong> the North East %<br />

<strong>of</strong> Section 24, Townshipl4, New Westminster <strong>District</strong>. The applicant described the<br />

improvements as:<br />

• clearing the land <strong>of</strong> all debris;<br />

• repairing the entire barn;<br />

• removing all blackberry bushes;<br />

• removing beaver dams to allow water to drain from the land;<br />

• depositing clean soil subject to the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Agricultural Land Commission<br />

Act, and<br />

• installing chain-link fencing around a ± 0.4 ha area surrounding the barn, to allow<br />

for safe storage <strong>of</strong> farm equipment.<br />

Recently the applicant has undertaken improvements to that neighbouring property<br />

on his own initiative as a gesture <strong>of</strong> good faith and without any assurances from the<br />

Commission with respect to the disposition <strong>of</strong> his application.<br />

On 01 May <strong>2009</strong>, the South Coast Panel discussed the amended proposal and reached<br />

a consensus that it would be appropriate to pursue a more in-depth review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

applicant's proposal and associated agricultural improvement options, but only after<br />

receiving information from the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mission</strong> regarding its technical planning review<br />

<strong>of</strong> the industrial land supply in the community and future growth objectives for various<br />

types <strong>of</strong> industry. The Commission believes that this information will be crucial to its<br />

review <strong>of</strong> the proposal, thus further consideration <strong>of</strong> the application should be deferred<br />

pending receipt <strong>of</strong> this planning information. The Commission does not know the timing<br />

for receipt <strong>of</strong> this information from the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mission</strong>.<br />

The Commission agreed that when it receives this information from the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Mission</strong> it will review it in relation to the application and associated proposals, and will<br />

inform the applicant and the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> its disposition <strong>of</strong> the application.<br />

The Commission will inform the applicant and the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mission</strong> about the foregoing<br />

discussion and will not engage in further review <strong>of</strong> the application or discussion with the<br />

applicant about the application and associated matters until it has considered information<br />

provided by the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mission</strong>.<br />

Nothing in these notes or previous communications with the applicant should be interpreted<br />

to fetter the discretion <strong>of</strong> the Commission in future deliberations or decisions on<br />

this application.<br />

END OF FILE NOTE<br />

Signature<br />

Date<br />

fisl ir4 ©0 Q

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!