June 15, 2009 - District of Mission
June 15, 2009 - District of Mission
June 15, 2009 - District of Mission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
26<br />
Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 2 - 13 May <strong>2009</strong> — Note to file<br />
File # MM-37779<br />
Since the January meeting the applicant has provided more detail with regard to the<br />
potential inclusion <strong>of</strong> land(s) into the ALR and the enhancement <strong>of</strong> a 41.5 ha parcel in<br />
the ALR diagonally across the Lougheed Highway to the northwest <strong>of</strong> the subject<br />
property. That neighbouring property is described as the remainder <strong>of</strong> the North East %<br />
<strong>of</strong> Section 24, Townshipl4, New Westminster <strong>District</strong>. The applicant described the<br />
improvements as:<br />
• clearing the land <strong>of</strong> all debris;<br />
• repairing the entire barn;<br />
• removing all blackberry bushes;<br />
• removing beaver dams to allow water to drain from the land;<br />
• depositing clean soil subject to the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Agricultural Land Commission<br />
Act, and<br />
• installing chain-link fencing around a ± 0.4 ha area surrounding the barn, to allow<br />
for safe storage <strong>of</strong> farm equipment.<br />
Recently the applicant has undertaken improvements to that neighbouring property<br />
on his own initiative as a gesture <strong>of</strong> good faith and without any assurances from the<br />
Commission with respect to the disposition <strong>of</strong> his application.<br />
On 01 May <strong>2009</strong>, the South Coast Panel discussed the amended proposal and reached<br />
a consensus that it would be appropriate to pursue a more in-depth review <strong>of</strong> the<br />
applicant's proposal and associated agricultural improvement options, but only after<br />
receiving information from the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mission</strong> regarding its technical planning review<br />
<strong>of</strong> the industrial land supply in the community and future growth objectives for various<br />
types <strong>of</strong> industry. The Commission believes that this information will be crucial to its<br />
review <strong>of</strong> the proposal, thus further consideration <strong>of</strong> the application should be deferred<br />
pending receipt <strong>of</strong> this planning information. The Commission does not know the timing<br />
for receipt <strong>of</strong> this information from the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mission</strong>.<br />
The Commission agreed that when it receives this information from the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Mission</strong> it will review it in relation to the application and associated proposals, and will<br />
inform the applicant and the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> its disposition <strong>of</strong> the application.<br />
The Commission will inform the applicant and the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mission</strong> about the foregoing<br />
discussion and will not engage in further review <strong>of</strong> the application or discussion with the<br />
applicant about the application and associated matters until it has considered information<br />
provided by the <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mission</strong>.<br />
Nothing in these notes or previous communications with the applicant should be interpreted<br />
to fetter the discretion <strong>of</strong> the Commission in future deliberations or decisions on<br />
this application.<br />
END OF FILE NOTE<br />
Signature<br />
Date<br />
fisl ir4 ©0 Q