June 15, 2009 - District of Mission
June 15, 2009 - District of Mission
June 15, 2009 - District of Mission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
57<br />
committees. There is a mixture <strong>of</strong> the roles <strong>of</strong> councillors who are appointed to<br />
these groups.<br />
In some cases the councillor is the chair <strong>of</strong> the committee while in other cases<br />
council members simply participate as committee members. With one exception<br />
council members can vote on any question that the committee is discussing. The<br />
exception is the Economic Development Select Committee where the councillors<br />
and the staff are "ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio" members with no voting privileges (1) .<br />
If there is any confusion arising from the role <strong>of</strong> "liaison" it is in relation to<br />
commissions, because these are the only committees to which council has<br />
appointed a "liaison". The proposed policy is intended to clarify that role as well.<br />
Alternate Appointees as Liaisons<br />
Council appoints alternates for all liaisons. I am recommending that this practice<br />
be reconsidered (except for other governmental boards or committees) based on<br />
some simple assumptions:<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
it is difficult for an alternate to be familiar with the issues being discussed<br />
unless they have attended previous meetings;<br />
the minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting will provide the information to council; if there is<br />
any clarity required, the liaison can obtain the information at the next<br />
board/committee meeting; and<br />
(c) it is rare that the liaison is unable to attend their committee or board<br />
meetings.<br />
The exception to this might be if a liaison is expected to be absent for an extended<br />
period <strong>of</strong> time<br />
Fee-For-Service Organizations<br />
Finally, council inquired whether a council liaison should be appointed to<br />
organizations that receive fee-for-service grants. I do not believe that would be a<br />
good practice for the following reasons:<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
(c)<br />
(d)<br />
Council approves funding on the basis <strong>of</strong> proposed services to be provided by<br />
the organization.<br />
The organization that receives the funds must provide an annual report to<br />
verify delivery the services.<br />
Council has no control over the operation <strong>of</strong> the fee-for-service organizations,<br />
and that is appropriate.<br />
There are other grants provided by council that include fairly similar amounts.<br />
It would be impractical to require a council liaison to all organizations that<br />
receive grants.<br />
(1) It should be noted that it is not inherent that ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio members cannot vote, in fact it is usually the opposite. If voting<br />
privileges are not extended then it must be based on a formal decision that this is the case.<br />
Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 5