01.01.2015 Views

June 15, 2009 - District of Mission

June 15, 2009 - District of Mission

June 15, 2009 - District of Mission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

57<br />

committees. There is a mixture <strong>of</strong> the roles <strong>of</strong> councillors who are appointed to<br />

these groups.<br />

In some cases the councillor is the chair <strong>of</strong> the committee while in other cases<br />

council members simply participate as committee members. With one exception<br />

council members can vote on any question that the committee is discussing. The<br />

exception is the Economic Development Select Committee where the councillors<br />

and the staff are "ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio" members with no voting privileges (1) .<br />

If there is any confusion arising from the role <strong>of</strong> "liaison" it is in relation to<br />

commissions, because these are the only committees to which council has<br />

appointed a "liaison". The proposed policy is intended to clarify that role as well.<br />

Alternate Appointees as Liaisons<br />

Council appoints alternates for all liaisons. I am recommending that this practice<br />

be reconsidered (except for other governmental boards or committees) based on<br />

some simple assumptions:<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

it is difficult for an alternate to be familiar with the issues being discussed<br />

unless they have attended previous meetings;<br />

the minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting will provide the information to council; if there is<br />

any clarity required, the liaison can obtain the information at the next<br />

board/committee meeting; and<br />

(c) it is rare that the liaison is unable to attend their committee or board<br />

meetings.<br />

The exception to this might be if a liaison is expected to be absent for an extended<br />

period <strong>of</strong> time<br />

Fee-For-Service Organizations<br />

Finally, council inquired whether a council liaison should be appointed to<br />

organizations that receive fee-for-service grants. I do not believe that would be a<br />

good practice for the following reasons:<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

(d)<br />

Council approves funding on the basis <strong>of</strong> proposed services to be provided by<br />

the organization.<br />

The organization that receives the funds must provide an annual report to<br />

verify delivery the services.<br />

Council has no control over the operation <strong>of</strong> the fee-for-service organizations,<br />

and that is appropriate.<br />

There are other grants provided by council that include fairly similar amounts.<br />

It would be impractical to require a council liaison to all organizations that<br />

receive grants.<br />

(1) It should be noted that it is not inherent that ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio members cannot vote, in fact it is usually the opposite. If voting<br />

privileges are not extended then it must be based on a formal decision that this is the case.<br />

Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!